PEJ ranks 2nd and PAWZ 3rd of 10 funds in the Consumer Lifestyle Category.
PAWZ vs PEJ
PAWZ −0.08pt a year
0.50%0.58%
PEJ 35.3×the volume
1.74K61.3K
PEJ +14.6pt
−8.5%+6.1%
PAWZ vs PEJ Performance
−36.0%+34.6%
- PAWZ 0.50%, better
- PEJ 0.58%
- PAWZ $33M
- PEJ $358M
- PAWZ −3.0%
- PEJ +14.2%, better
- PAWZ 0.70%, better
- PEJ 0.51%
- PAWZ 28
- PEJ 32
- PAWZ 1.74K sh
- PEJ 61.3K sh, better
- PAWZ $52.22
- PEJ $66.44
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PAWZ | PEJ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A70Higher | C46 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C45 | B66Higher |
| Tradability | C52 | A86Higher |
| Holdings | F16 | B69Higher |
| Durability | B62 | A90Higher |
Rank among Consumer Lifestyle funds
Same Category. PAWZ and PEJ are both graded against the same 10 Consumer Lifestyle funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PAWZC
PEJB
In short
PAWZ One ticker for the pet economy: vet clinics, kibble makers, animal-health labs, the retailers that ship it all. PAWZ has tracked the FactSet Pet Care Index, globally, since 2018.
PEJ The travel-and-fun trade, run like a quant screen: roughly 30 US leisure and entertainment stocks re-ranked every quarter on momentum, quality, management action and value. Fee is 0.58%, with no waiver doing the work. Trading since 2005.
Stated mandate
PAWZ The fund invests globally in companies positioned at the forefront of the pet care industry.
PEJ The fund seeks capital appreciation through an index that evaluates companies using multiple investment-merit criteria.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PAWZ vs PEJ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PAWZ vs PEJ Cost
Overpaying PEJ vs PAWZ
$1,474
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PAWZ 0.50%
$9,979
PEJ 0.58%
$11,453
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PAWZ | PEJ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $1,041 | $141 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $3,986 | $526 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $11,453 | $1,474 |
- 0.50%PAWZ, cheaper
- 0.58%PEJ
- Middle half of Consumer Lifestyle funds
- Median 0.54%
PAWZ 3rd cheapest of 10 funds
PEJ 6th cheapest of 10 funds
PAWZ vs PEJ Dividends
- PAWZ 0.70%, better
- PEJ 0.51%
- PAWZ $0.36
- PEJ $0.34
- PAWZ $0.06
- PEJ $0.06
- PAWZ Sep 23, 2026
- PEJ Sep 21, 2026
- PAWZ Sep 29, 2026
- PEJ Sep 25, 2026
- PAWZ Quarterly
- PEJ Quarterly
Distribution history
PAWZ vs PEJ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- PAWZ
- PEJ
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PAWZ 21.3%PEJ 16.9%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- PAWZ 0.24PEJ 1.08, better
- Worst fall
- PAWZ −50.1%PEJ −34.7%, better
- Market sensitivity
- PAWZ 1.05PEJ 1.10
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.58% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.51%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.58% · 0.51%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.58% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.