UYG ranks 2nd and LTL 37th of 95 funds in the Leveraged Long (2x & Other) Category.
LTL vs UYG
UYG −0.02pt a year
0.95%0.93%
LTL 1.2×the volume
21.1K17.3K
UYG +12.2pt
+4.8%+17.0%
LTL vs UYG Performance
+64.8%+56.5%
- LTL 0.95%
- UYG 0.93%, better
- LTL $4M
- UYG $777M
- LTL −28.7%
- UYG +11.5%, better
- LTL 1.44%
- UYG 11.13%, better
- LTL 23
- UYG 83
- LTL 21.1K sh, better
- UYG 17.3K sh
- LTL $19.18
- UYG $93.27
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | LTL | UYG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C51 | A70Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B55 | A76Higher |
| Tradability | B62 | A78Higher |
| Holdings | C42 | |
| Durability | B58 | A80Higher |
Rank among Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. LTL and UYG are both graded against the same 95 Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
LTLC
UYGA
In short
LTL The only ETF targeting 2x the daily move of the Communication Services sector, and older than the sector itself: it launched in 2008 as a telecom fund, a decade before GICS redrew the lines to pull in media and internet names.
UYG Listed in January 2007, a year before the banking crash, UYG targets 2x the daily move of the financial stocks in the S&P 500. A veteran of the leveraged shelf, priced at 0.93% with no fee waiver propping that number up.
Stated mandate
LTL The fund targets twice the daily performance of the Communication Services sector.
UYG UYG seeks pre-expense daily results equal to 2x the daily performance of the S&P Financial Select Sector Index. It is designed to provide magnified financials-sector exposure on a daily basis.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
LTL vs UYG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
LTL vs UYG Cost
Overpaying LTL vs UYG
$330
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
LTL 0.95%
$17,869
UYG 0.93%
$17,539
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | LTL | UYG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $1,644 | $34 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $6,199 | $123 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $17,539 | $330 |
- 0.95%LTL
- 0.93%UYG, cheaper
- Middle half of Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
UYG 29th cheapest of 95 funds
LTL 32nd cheapest of 95 funds
LTL vs UYG Dividends
- LTL 1.44%
- UYG 11.13%, better
- LTL $0.28
- UYG $10.38
- LTL $0.08
- UYG $0.09
- LTL Sep 23, 2026
- UYG Sep 23, 2026
- LTL Sep 29, 2026
- UYG Sep 29, 2026
- LTL Quarterly
- UYG Quarterly
Distribution history
LTL vs UYG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- LTL
- UYG
Risk facts
- Volatility
- LTL 30.1%, betterUYG 30.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- LTL 0.73UYG 1.04, better
- Worst fall
- LTL −53.2%UYG −47.8%, better
- Market sensitivity
- LTL 1.69UYG 1.58
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.93% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.93% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.93% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.