Skip to content

LTL vs QLD

ProShares Ultra Communication Services

LTLCNYSE Arca

ProShares Ultra QQQ

QLDANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

QLD −0.06pt a year

LTL0.95%QLD0.89%

Avg volume · 30D

QLD 196.4×the volume

LTL21.1KQLD4.15M

10Y return · a year

QLD +27.1pt

LTL+4.8%QLD+31.9%

LTL vs QLD Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+64.8%LTL+97.9%QLD

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. LTL +64.8%. QLD +97.9%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−50%0%150%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
LTL 0.95%
QLD 0.89%, better
Fund size
LTL $4M
QLD $13.3B
1Y total return
LTL −28.7%
QLD +10.7%, better
Yield (12M)
LTL 1.44%, better
QLD 0.15%
Holdings
LTL 23
QLD 113
Avg volume (30D)
LTL 21.1K sh
QLD 4.15M sh, better
NAV per share
LTL $19.18
QLD $82.56
52W range

ETF.net Grade

LTL: Cost 51, Risk 55, Mission not scored, Tradability 62, Holdings 42, Durability 58. QLD: Cost 72, Risk 66, Mission 95, Tradability 100, Holdings 72, Durability 81.
Pillar letters and Scores for LTL, QLD, with each pillar’s weight
PillarLTLQLD
Cost30% weightC51A72Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA95
Risk15% weightB55B66Higher
Tradability15% weightB62A100Higher
Holdings10% weightC42A72Higher
Durability5% weightB58A81Higher

Rank among Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. LTL and QLD are both graded against the same 95 Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Leveraged Long (2x & Other)⁠

Category · 95 funds
See all 95 ›

QLD ranks 1st and LTL 37th of 95 funds in the Leveraged Long (2x & Other) Category.

  1. Rank 1AQLDProShares Ultra QQQScore 77
  2. Rank 2AUYGProShares Ultra FinancialsScore 74
  3. Rank 37CEUVXCorgi Lithography & Semiconductor Photonics 2x Daily ETFScore 40
  4. Rank 37CLTLProShares Ultra Communication ServicesScore 40
  5. Rank 37CMEGXCorgi U.S. Mega-Cap Growth 2x Daily ETFScore 40

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

LTLCProShares Ultra Communication Services

QLDAProShares Ultra QQQ

In short

LTL The only ETF targeting 2x the daily move of the Communication Services sector, and older than the sector itself: it launched in 2008 as a telecom fund, a decade before GICS redrew the lines to pull in media and internet names.

QLD The 2x dial on the Nasdaq-100. QLD aims for twice the index's daily move, half the dose of the 3x crowd, and it has been running that playbook since 2006. The multiple resets every session.

Stated mandate

LTL The fund targets twice the daily performance of the Communication Services sector.

QLD The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to twice the daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index.

Why people hold it

  • LTL ProShares calls it the only ETF targeting 2x the daily return of the communication services sector, so this slice of geared sector exposure has no direct in-category rival.proshares.com
  • 0.95% net of a waiver through September 30, 2027 (1.83% gross), near the median of 97 funds in its category and in line with ProShares siblings DDM at 0.95% and ROM at 0.93%.
  • Trading since March 2008, it rode out the 2018 sector overhaul and sits in the stronger end of the leveraged bull funds we grade.sec.gov
  • QLD Costs 0.89% net of a waiver through September 30, 2027 (0.96% gross), below the leveraged-bull category median and under Ultra stablemates ROM (0.93%) and DDM (0.95%).
  • Hits its stated daily 2x mark with very little drift, one of the tighter implementations among the roughly 100 leveraged bull funds in its group.
  • A multi-billion-dollar, actively traded fund, so entering and exiting rarely means hunting for the other side of the trade.
  • Trading since June 2006, which makes it one of the longest-running leveraged equity funds on the US shelf rather than a recent product-shelf experiment.

Worth knowing

  • LTL The 2x target applies to one day. ProShares says compounding can make longer-period returns differ in amount and even direction, and to monitor holdings as often as daily.sec.gov
  • One of the smaller, less-traded funds in its category, which can mean wider bid-ask spreads than the headline leveraged names.
  • Around two dozen stocks, all drawn from the S&P 500's communication services roster, so this is concentrated sector exposure by construction.sec.gov
  • QLD The 2x objective covers one day only. Hold longer and daily resets plus compounding can push results away from twice the index's move over that stretch, in either direction.proshares.com
  • Magnification runs both ways: a down day in the Nasdaq-100 lands on shareholders at roughly double size, same as an up day.
  • Cheap for geared exposure, still well above a plain unleveraged Nasdaq-100 tracker. The waiver is set to lapse September 30, 2027, after which the 0.96% gross rate applies unless renewed.

Full LTL profile⁠

Full QLD profile⁠

LTL vs QLD Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

LTL vs QLD Cost

Overpaying LTL vs QLD

$997

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • LTL 0.95%

    $17,869

  • QLD 0.89%

    $16,872

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • LTL 0.95%
  • QLD 0.89%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530LTL $17,869QLD $16,872

Year by year

YearLTLQLDOverpaying
10$1,678$1,576$102
20$6,322$5,953$369
30$17,869$16,872$997

Expense ratio

  • 0.95%LTL
  • 0.89%QLD, cheaper
  • Middle half of Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
  • Median 0.95%

QLD 28th cheapest of 95 funds

LTL 32nd cheapest of 95 funds

LTL vs QLD Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
LTL 1.44%, better
QLD 0.15%
Payout (12M)
LTL $0.28
QLD $0.12
Last payment
LTL $0.08
QLD $0.03
Ex-dividend
LTL Sep 23, 2026
QLD Sep 23, 2026
Paid on
LTL Sep 29, 2026
QLD Sep 29, 2026
Frequency
LTL Quarterly
QLD Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

LTLQuarterly · 10 paymentsAll LTL payments⁠
One bar per payment. 10 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 20, 2024 $0.01; Jun 26, 2024 $0.02; Dec 23, 2024 $0.0083; Mar 26, 2025 $0.02; Jun 25, 2025 $0.03; Sep 24, 2025 $0.04; Dec 24, 2025 $0.09; Mar 25, 2026 $0.07; Jun 24, 2026 $0.04; Sep 23, 2026 $0.08. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.102017202020232026YTD
QLDQuarterly · 21 paymentsAll QLD payments⁠
One bar per payment. 21 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 22, 2017 $0.0012; Jun 21, 2017 $0.00044; Dec 26, 2018 $0.005; Mar 20, 2019 $0.0078; Jun 25, 2019 $0.0052; Dec 24, 2019 $0.0062; Mar 25, 2020 $0.0011; Dec 22, 2022 $0.05; Sep 20, 2023 $0.09; Dec 20, 2023 $0.04; Mar 20, 2024 $0.03; Jun 26, 2024 $0.05; Sep 25, 2024 $0.03; Dec 23, 2024 $0.03; Mar 26, 2025 $0.01; Jun 25, 2025 $0.06; Sep 24, 2025 $0.02; Dec 24, 2025 $0.02; Mar 25, 2026 $0.01; Jun 24, 2026 $0.06; Sep 23, 2026 $0.03. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.102017202020232026YTD

LTL vs QLD Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • LTL
  • QLD
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: QLD −63.7% · Dec 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−60%−40%−20%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
LTL 30.1%, betterQLD 36.7%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
LTL 0.73QLD 1.04, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
LTL −53.2%, betterQLD −63.7%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
LTL 1.69QLD 2.46

LTL and QLD in the news

Popular comparisons

  • LTLCvsUYGA

    ProShares Ultra Communication Services · ProShares Ultra Financials

    Expense ratio
    0.95% · 0.93%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QLDAvsUYGA

    ProShares Ultra QQQ · ProShares Ultra Financials

    Expense ratio
    0.89% · 0.93%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LTLCvsROMA

    ProShares Ultra Communication Services · ProShares Ultra Technology

    Expense ratio
    0.95% · 0.93%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QLDAvsROMA

    ProShares Ultra QQQ · ProShares Ultra Technology

    Expense ratio
    0.89% · 0.93%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LTLCvsDDMB

    ProShares Ultra Communication Services · ProShares Ultra Dow30

    Expense ratio
    0.95% · 0.95%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QLDAvsDDMB

    ProShares Ultra QQQ · ProShares Ultra Dow30

    Expense ratio
    0.89% · 0.95%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.