DDM ranks 4th and LTL 37th of 95 funds in the Leveraged Long (2x & Other) Category.
DDM vs LTL
10.5%by weight
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.95%0.95%
DDM 8.8×the volume
185K21.1K
DDM +14.4pt
+19.2%+4.8%
DDM vs LTL Performance
+68.8%+64.8%
- DDM 0.95%
- LTL 0.95%
- DDM $507M
- LTL $4M
- DDM +13.4%, better
- LTL −28.7%
- DDM 0.98%
- LTL 1.44%, better
- DDM 34
- LTL 23
- DDM 185K sh, better
- LTL 21.1K sh
- DDM $62.99
- LTL $19.18
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DDM | LTL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C51 | C51 |
| Mission | A92 | |
| Risk | A79Higher | B55 |
| Tradability | A93Higher | B62 |
| Holdings | C53Higher | C42 |
| Durability | A79Higher | B58 |
Rank among Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. DDM and LTL are both graded against the same 95 Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DDMB
LTLC
In short
DDM The Dow dates to 1896. DDM is the only ETF built to double its daily move: 2x the Dow Jones Industrial Average, reset every single day, for 0.95% a year, running since 2006.
LTL The only ETF targeting 2x the daily move of the Communication Services sector, and older than the sector itself: it launched in 2008 as a telecom fund, a decade before GICS redrew the lines to pull in media and internet names.
Stated mandate
DDM The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to twice the daily performance of the Dow Jones Industrial Average.
LTL The fund targets twice the daily performance of the Communication Services sector.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DDM vs LTL Holdings
How DDM and LTL differ
10.5%
Shared holdings make up 57.4% of LTL and 10.5% of DDM.
Level by level
- Holdings10.5%
Sector
No Sector split for LTL.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in DDMMore in LTL | DDM | LTL |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Concentration
- DDM65.2%
- LTL85.3%
- DDM33
- LTL22
Asset class
- DDM
- Equity
- LTL
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in DDM31
- In both2
- Only in LTL20
Only in DDM
31 securities, 89.5% of DDM by weight
- Proshares Genius Mny Mkt Etf28.63%
- Goldman Sachs Group Inc6.33%
- Caterpillar Inc4.41%
- Microsoft Corp3.70%
- Amgen Inc3.30%
- Visa Inc-Class A Shares2.93%
- UnitedHealth Group Inc2.88%
- Travelers Cos Inc/The2.81%
- Apple Inc2.44%
- JPMorgan Chase & Co2.39%
- Sherwin-Williams Co/The2.36%
- Home Depot Inc2.33%
- American Express Co2.26%
- Johnson & Johnson1.93%
- Mcdonald's Corp1.83%
- Intl Business Machines Corp1.83%
- Amazon.com Inc1.70%
- Chevron Corp1.67%
- Salesforce Inc1.62%
- Honeywell International Inc1.55%
- NVIDIA Corp1.45%
- 3M Co1.23%
- Boeing Co/The1.21%
- Procter & Gamble Co/The1.14%
- Merck & Co. Inc.1.06%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2026-11-170.98%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2026-12-030.98%
- Walmart Inc0.87%
- Cisco Systems Inc0.74%
- Coca-Cola Co/The0.67%
- Nike Inc -Cl B0.27%
Only in LTL
20 securities, 42.6% of LTL by weight
- Meta Platforms Inc-Class A11.29%
- Alphabet Inc-Cl C4.58%
- Comcast Corp-Class A2.53%
- Take-Two Interactive Softwre2.42%
- Verizon Communications Inc2.41%
- T-Mobile Us Inc2.36%
- AT&T Inc2.28%
- Netflix Inc2.19%
- Live Nation Entertainment In2.12%
- Applovin Corp-Class A2.00%
- Omnicom Group1.69%
- Reddit Inc-Cl A1.01%
- Echostar Corp-A1.01%
- Fox Corp - Class A0.95%
- Charter Communications Inc-A0.95%
- Tko Group Holdings Inc0.81%
- News Corp - Class A0.79%
- Fox Corp - Class B0.57%
- Skydance Corp0.33%
- News Corp - Class B0.28%
Weight gaps
All 2 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.
| Holding | More in DDMMore in LTL | DDM | LTL |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alphabet Inc-Cl A | LTL +3.71 points | 1.98% | 5.69% |
| Walt Disney Co/The | LTL +2.07 points | 0.79% | 2.86% |
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DDM vs LTL Cost
Same expense ratio
$17,869
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DDM 0.95%
$17,869
LTL 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DDM | LTL |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $1,678 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $6,322 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $17,869 |
- 0.95%DDM
- 0.95%LTL
- Middle half of Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
DDM 32nd cheapest of 95 funds
LTL 32nd cheapest of 95 funds
DDM vs LTL Dividends
- DDM 0.98%
- LTL 1.44%, better
- DDM $0.62
- LTL $0.28
- DDM $0.15
- LTL $0.08
- DDM Sep 23, 2026
- LTL Sep 23, 2026
- DDM Sep 29, 2026
- LTL Sep 29, 2026
- DDM Quarterly
- LTL Quarterly
Distribution history
DDM vs LTL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- DDM
- LTL
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DDM 24.6%, betterLTL 30.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- DDM 0.96, betterLTL 0.73
- Worst fall
- DDM −40.2%, betterLTL −53.2%
- Market sensitivity
- DDM 1.74LTL 1.69
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.