Skip to content

DDM vs LTL

ProShares Ultra Dow30

DDMBNYSE Arca

ProShares Ultra Communication Services

LTLCNYSE Arca

Overlap

10.5%by weight

Expense ratio

Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.

DDM0.95%LTL0.95%

Avg volume · 30D

DDM 8.8×the volume

DDM185KLTL21.1K

10Y return · a year

DDM +14.4pt

DDM+19.2%LTL+4.8%

DDM vs LTL Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+68.8%DDM+64.8%LTL

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. DDM +68.8%. LTL +64.8%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−50%0%100%150%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
DDM 0.95%
LTL 0.95%
Fund size
DDM $507M
LTL $4M
1Y total return
DDM +13.4%, better
LTL −28.7%
Yield (12M)
DDM 0.98%
LTL 1.44%, better
Holdings
DDM 34
LTL 23
Avg volume (30D)
DDM 185K sh, better
LTL 21.1K sh
NAV per share
DDM $62.99
LTL $19.18
52W range

ETF.net Grade

DDM: Cost 51, Risk 79, Mission 92, Tradability 93, Holdings 53, Durability 79. LTL: Cost 51, Risk 55, Mission not scored, Tradability 62, Holdings 42, Durability 58.
Pillar letters and Scores for DDM, LTL, with each pillar’s weight
PillarDDMLTL
Cost30% weightC51C51
Mission25% weightA92Not scored
Risk15% weightA79HigherB55
Tradability15% weightA93HigherB62
Holdings10% weightC53HigherC42
Durability5% weightA79HigherB58

Rank among Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. DDM and LTL are both graded against the same 95 Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Leveraged Long (2x & Other)⁠

Category · 95 funds
See all 95 ›

DDM ranks 4th and LTL 37th of 95 funds in the Leveraged Long (2x & Other) Category.

  1. Rank 1AQLDProShares Ultra QQQScore 77
  2. Rank 2AUYGProShares Ultra FinancialsScore 74
  3. Rank 3AROMProShares Ultra TechnologyScore 71
  4. Rank 4BDDMProShares Ultra Dow30Score 69
  5. Rank 5BUSDProShares Ultra SemiconductorsScore 68
  6. Rank 37CEUVXCorgi Lithography & Semiconductor Photonics 2x Daily ETFScore 40
  7. Rank 37CLTLProShares Ultra Communication ServicesScore 40
  8. Rank 37CMEGXCorgi U.S. Mega-Cap Growth 2x Daily ETFScore 40

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

DDMBProShares Ultra Dow30

LTLCProShares Ultra Communication Services

In short

DDM The Dow dates to 1896. DDM is the only ETF built to double its daily move: 2x the Dow Jones Industrial Average, reset every single day, for 0.95% a year, running since 2006.

LTL The only ETF targeting 2x the daily move of the Communication Services sector, and older than the sector itself: it launched in 2008 as a telecom fund, a decade before GICS redrew the lines to pull in media and internet names.

Stated mandate

DDM The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to twice the daily performance of the Dow Jones Industrial Average.

LTL The fund targets twice the daily performance of the Communication Services sector.

Why people hold it

  • DDM The only ETF that targets 2x the daily return of the Dow Jones Industrial Average. Leveraged blue-chip exposure through one ticker, no margin account needed.proshares.com
  • Trading since 2006, and its day-to-day results have stayed close to the 2x daily target across nearly two decades of market cycles.proshares.com
  • Easy to get in and out of for a fund its size, and one of the strongest implementations in its peer group of leveraged bull funds.
  • The 0.95% fee sits near the typical charge for leveraged funds, and it is the standing rate, not a number propped up by a temporary waiver.
  • LTL ProShares calls it the only ETF targeting 2x the daily return of the communication services sector, so this slice of geared sector exposure has no direct in-category rival.proshares.com
  • 0.95% net of a waiver through September 30, 2027 (1.83% gross), near the median of 97 funds in its category and in line with ProShares siblings DDM at 0.95% and ROM at 0.93%.
  • Trading since March 2008, it rode out the 2018 sector overhaul and sits in the stronger end of the leveraged bull funds we grade.sec.gov

Worth knowing

  • DDM The 2x target resets daily. Hold for weeks and compounding takes over, so results can land well away from twice the Dow's move, especially in choppy markets.proshares.com
  • The Dow is price-weighted across 30 blue chips, so a high-priced stock swings it more than a far larger company does.spglobal.com
  • Sibling leveraged funds cost a little less: QLD charges 0.89% net of a waiver through September 30, 2027, against a 0.96% gross rate.
  • LTL The 2x target applies to one day. ProShares says compounding can make longer-period returns differ in amount and even direction, and to monitor holdings as often as daily.sec.gov
  • One of the smaller, less-traded funds in its category, which can mean wider bid-ask spreads than the headline leveraged names.
  • Around two dozen stocks, all drawn from the S&P 500's communication services roster, so this is concentrated sector exposure by construction.sec.gov

Full DDM profile⁠

Full LTL profile⁠

DDM vs LTL Holdings

How DDM and LTL differ

Overlap by weight

10.5%

Shared holdings make up 57.4% of LTL and 10.5% of DDM.

Level by level

  • Holdings2 in both10.5%
  • Asset classEquity100%
  • Countryby domicile100%

Sector

No Sector split for LTL.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in DDM and LTL, widest gap first
CountryMore in DDMMore in LTL
United StatesSame weight

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • DDM65.2%
  • LTL85.3%

Securities held

  • DDM33
  • LTL22

Asset class

DDM
Equity
LTL
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in DDM31
  • In both2
  • Only in LTL20

Only in DDM

31 securities, 89.5% of DDM by weight

  • Proshares Genius Mny Mkt Etf28.63%
  • Goldman Sachs Group Inc6.33%
  • Caterpillar Inc4.41%

Only in LTL

20 securities, 42.6% of LTL by weight

  • Meta Platforms Inc-Class A11.29%
  • Alphabet Inc-Cl C4.58%
  • Comcast Corp-Class A2.53%

Weight gaps

All 2 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in DDM and LTL, widest gap first
HoldingMore in DDMMore in LTL
Alphabet Inc-Cl AGOOGLLTL +3.71 points
Walt Disney Co/TheDISLTL +2.07 points

All 41 DDM holdings⁠All 28 LTL holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

DDM vs LTL Cost

Same expense ratio

$17,869

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • DDM 0.95%

    $17,869

  • LTL 0.95%

    $17,869

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • DDM 0.95%
  • LTL 0.95%
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530DDM $17,869LTL $17,869

Year by year

YearDDMLTL
10$1,678$1,678
20$6,322$6,322
30$17,869$17,869

Expense ratio

  • 0.95%DDM
  • 0.95%LTL
  • Middle half of Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
  • Median 0.95%

DDM 32nd cheapest of 95 funds

LTL 32nd cheapest of 95 funds

DDM vs LTL Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
DDM 0.98%
LTL 1.44%, better
Payout (12M)
DDM $0.62
LTL $0.28
Last payment
DDM $0.15
LTL $0.08
Ex-dividend
DDM Sep 23, 2026
LTL Sep 23, 2026
Paid on
DDM Sep 29, 2026
LTL Sep 29, 2026
Frequency
DDM Quarterly
LTL Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

DDMQuarterly · 33 paymentsAll DDM payments⁠
One bar per payment. 33 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 22, 2017 $0.04; Jun 21, 2017 $0.03; Sep 27, 2017 $0.04; Dec 26, 2017 $0.04; Mar 21, 2018 $0.03; Jun 20, 2018 $0.03; Sep 26, 2018 $0.06; Dec 26, 2018 $0.04; Mar 20, 2019 $0.04; Jun 25, 2019 $0.05; Dec 24, 2019 $0.07; Mar 25, 2020 $0.06; Jun 24, 2020 $0.0055; Dec 23, 2020 $0.02; Mar 23, 2021 $0.01; Sep 22, 2021 $0.0052; Dec 23, 2021 $0.05; Mar 23, 2022 $0.07; Jun 22, 2022 $0.04; Sep 21, 2022 $0.04; Dec 22, 2022 $0.12; Dec 20, 2023 $0.11; Mar 20, 2024 $0.12; Jun 26, 2024 $0.13; Sep 25, 2024 $0.14; Dec 23, 2024 $0.09; Mar 26, 2025 $0.13; Jun 25, 2025 $0.13; Sep 24, 2025 $0.15; Dec 24, 2025 $0.14; Mar 25, 2026 $0.16; Jun 24, 2026 $0.17; Sep 23, 2026 $0.15. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.202017202020232026YTD
LTLQuarterly · 10 paymentsAll LTL payments⁠
One bar per payment. 10 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 20, 2024 $0.01; Jun 26, 2024 $0.02; Dec 23, 2024 $0.0083; Mar 26, 2025 $0.02; Jun 25, 2025 $0.03; Sep 24, 2025 $0.04; Dec 24, 2025 $0.09; Mar 25, 2026 $0.07; Jun 24, 2026 $0.04; Sep 23, 2026 $0.08. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.202017202020232026YTD

DDM vs LTL Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • DDM
  • LTL
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: LTL −53.2% · Oct 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−50%−40%−30%−20%−10%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
DDM 24.6%, betterLTL 30.1%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
DDM 0.96, betterLTL 0.73
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
DDM −40.2%, betterLTL −53.2%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
DDM 1.74LTL 1.69

Popular comparisons

  • DDMBvsQLDA

    ProShares Ultra Dow30 · ProShares Ultra QQQ

    Expense ratio
    0.95% · 0.89%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LTLCvsQLDA

    ProShares Ultra Communication Services · ProShares Ultra QQQ

    Expense ratio
    0.95% · 0.89%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • DDMBvsUYGA

    ProShares Ultra Dow30 · ProShares Ultra Financials

    Expense ratio
    0.95% · 0.93%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LTLCvsUYGA

    ProShares Ultra Communication Services · ProShares Ultra Financials

    Expense ratio
    0.95% · 0.93%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • DDMBvsROMA

    ProShares Ultra Dow30 · ProShares Ultra Technology

    Expense ratio
    0.95% · 0.93%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LTLCvsROMA

    ProShares Ultra Communication Services · ProShares Ultra Technology

    Expense ratio
    0.95% · 0.93%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.