MAUG vs QFLR: Grades, Fees and Holdings Compared

Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (August) ETF

MAUGCCboe

Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF

QFLRCNYSE Arca

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

MAUG −0.40pt a year

MAUG0.49%QFLR0.89%

Avg volume · 30D

QFLR 343.2×the volume

MAUG185QFLR63.5K

MAUG vs QFLR Performance

Aug 5, 2026 – Nov 5, 2026

−1.4%MAUG−7.0%QFLR

Expense ratio: MAUG 0.49%, better; QFLR 0.89%
Fund size: MAUG $2M; QFLR $493M
1Y total return: MAUG No data; QFLR −3.6%
Yield (12M): MAUG No data; QFLR 0.00%
Holdings: MAUG 4; QFLR 50
Avg volume (30D): MAUG 185 sh; QFLR 63.5K sh, better
NAV per share: MAUG $33.60; QFLR $34.59
52W range

ETF.net Grade

Pillar letters and Scores for MAUG, QFLR, with each pillar’s weight
Pillar	MAUG	QFLR
Cost30% weight	A89Higher	F24
Mission25% weight	Not scored	Not scored
Risk15% weight	A85Higher	D38
Tradability15% weight	C40	A76Higher
Holdings10% weight	Not scored	C50
Durability5% weight	D29	A78Higher

Rank among Managed Floor funds

How we build Categories ›

Same Category. MAUG and QFLR are both graded against the same 5 Managed Floor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Managed Floor⁠

Category · 5 funds

See all 5 ›

QFLR ranks 3rd and MAUG 5th of 5 funds in the Managed Floor Category.

Rank 1CSFLRInnovator Equity Managed Floor ETFScore 51
Rank 2CTRIOMC Trio Equity Buffered ETFScore 49
Rank 3CQFLRInnovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETFScore 44
Rank 4CIFLRInnovator International Developed Managed Floor ETFScore 41
Rank 5CMAUGPacer Swan SOS Moderate (August) ETFScore 40

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

MAUGCPacer Swan SOS Moderate (August) ETF

QFLRCInnovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF

In short

MAUG No data

QFLR Most Nasdaq-100 downside plays lock you into a 12-month outcome period with a reset date. QFLR skips the calendar: about 50 large-cap stocks with a ladder of put options underneath, run by a manager rather than a fixed series.

Stated mandate

MAUG No data

QFLR The Fund seeks capital appreciation through participation in U.S. large-capitalization companies represented by the Nasdaq-100 Index while limiting potential maximum losses. It uses a hedging strategy with laddered put options and short-dated call sales.

Why people hold it

MAUG No data

QFLR The hedge rides a ladder of puts instead of a single 12-month outcome period, so there is no reset date to time and no waiting for the next series to open.
It owns roughly 50 U.S. large caps directly rather than options on another fund, with the put ladder and call writing layered on top.
For a niche hedged strategy, it changes hands easily: one of the smoother names in this corner of the market to get in and out of.

Worth knowing

MAUG No data

QFLR Fee is 0.89% a year, above the laddered and structured-protection options in its group (PBQQ at 0.50%, CPNS and CPNJ at 0.69%).
The floor is financed by selling short-dated calls, so a fast Nasdaq-100 rally gets clipped. Upside is the currency here.
The mandate is to limit maximum losses, not erase them, and the manager sets the hedge. No published cap or buffer to check before you buy.

Full MAUG profile⁠

Full QFLR profile⁠

MAUG vs QFLR Holdings

How MAUG and QFLR differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Level by level

Holdings0 in both0.0%
Sector11 Sectors73.1%
Countryby domicile99.3%
Asset classStocks100%

Sector

Sector weights in MAUG and QFLR, widest gap first
Sector	Gap	MAUG	QFLR
Technology	QFLR +20.1 points	39.2%	59.3%
Financials	MAUG +11.1 points	11.9%	0.8%
Health Care	MAUG +6.7 points	10.0%	3.3%
Communication	QFLR +4.7 points	8.4%	13.1%
Energy	MAUG +3.1 points	3.8%	0.7%
Industrials	MAUG +1.9 points	7.6%	5.7%
Real Estate	MAUG +1.8 points	1.8%	0.0%
Consumer Discretionary	QFLR +1.8 points	9.1%	10.9%
Materials	MAUG +1.6 points	1.6%	0.0%
Utilities	MAUG +0.7 points	2.0%	1.3%
Consumer Staples	QFLR +0.2 points	4.7%	4.9%

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in MAUG and QFLR, widest gap first
Country	More in MAUGMore in QFLR	Gap	MAUG	QFLR
Canada		QFLR +0.7 points	0.0%	0.7%
Other countries (6)		MAUG +0.7 points	100.0%	99.3%

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

MAUG103.2%
QFLR53.7%

Securities held

MAUG2
QFLR49

Asset class

MAUG: Stocks
QFLR: Stocks

Holdings

Only in MAUG2
In both0
Only in QFLR49

Only in MAUG

2 securities, 100% of MAUG by weight

Spy 07/30/2027 8.29 C98.88%
Spy 07/30/2027 747.1 P3.56%

Only in QFLR

49 securities, 100% of QFLR by weight

Apple Inc8.93%
NVIDIA Corp8.14%
Microsoft Corp8.03%
Amazon.com Inc5.60%
Walmart Inc5.09%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc4.11%
Micron Technology Inc4.08%
Tesla Inc3.56%
Meta Platforms Inc3.12%
Alphabet Inc3.09%
Broadcom Inc2.95%
Alphabet Inc2.93%
Space Exploration Technologies Corp2.92%
Gilead Sciences Inc2.60%
Lam Research Corp2.31%
Palantir Technologies Inc2.16%
Us Bank Mmda - Usbgfs 9 09/01/20372.15%
Marriott International Inc/MD1.80%
Autodesk Inc1.59%
Intel Corp1.57%
Xcel Energy Inc1.54%
Qqq Us 09/30/27 P6701.46%
Comcast Corp1.40%
O'Reilly Automotive Inc1.37%
Paychex Inc1.33%
Keurig Dr Pepper Inc1.18%
Qqq Us 06/30/27 P6601.10%
Workday Inc1.04%
NXP Semiconductors NV1.03%
Diamondback Energy Inc1.02%
GE HealthCare Technologies Inc0.99%
Old Dominion Freight Line Inc0.88%
Western Digital Corp0.86%
Monolithic Power Systems Inc0.82%
Teradyne Inc0.76%
Dexcom Inc0.75%
Sandisk Corp0.74%
Microchip Technology Inc0.74%
Thomson Reuters Corp0.66%
Datadog Inc0.66%
Lumentum Holdings Inc0.62%
Take-Two Interactive Software Inc0.61%
Honeywell Aerospace Inc0.58%
Copart Inc0.53%
Axon Enterprise Inc0.33%
Nebius Group NV0.23%
Qqq Us 03/31/27 P5200.16%
Qqq Us 12/31/26 P5550.07%
Ferrovial NV0.00%

Weight gaps

MAUG and QFLR share no securities.

All 6 MAUG holdings⁠All 52 QFLR holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

MAUG vs QFLR Cost

Overpaying QFLR vs MAUG

$7,080

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

MAUG 0.49%
$9,792
QFLR 0.89%
$16,872

Amount$10,000

Years30 years

Cost over time

MAUG 0.49%
QFLR 0.89%
Overpaying

Year by year

Year	MAUG	QFLR	Overpaying
10	$883	$1,576	$693
20	$3,394	$5,953	$2,559
30	$9,792	$16,872	$7,080

Expense ratio

0.49%MAUG, cheaper
0.89%QFLR

MAUG0.49%QFLR0.89%

0.49%0.89%

Middle half of Managed Floor funds
Median 0.89%

MAUG cheapest of 5 funds

QFLR 3rd cheapest of 5 funds

MAUG vs QFLR Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 5, 2026

Yield (12M): MAUG No data; QFLR 0.00%
Payout (12M): MAUG None; QFLR None

Distribution history

Per share, 2024 to 2025, same scale for both

MAUGAll MAUG payments⁠

No distribution history available.

QFLR3 paymentsAll QFLR payments⁠

MAUG vs QFLR Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years: MAUG No dataQFLR 10.7%since Feb 2024
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years: MAUG No dataQFLR 0.80since Feb 2024
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years: MAUG No dataQFLR −14.0%since Jan 2024
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years: MAUG 0.30QFLR 0.74; Market = 1

Popular comparisons

MAUGCvsSFLRC
Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (August) ETF · Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF
Expense ratio
0.49% · 0.89%
Category
QFLRCvsSFLRC
Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF · Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF
Expense ratio
0.89% · 0.89%
Category
MAUGCvsTRIOC
Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (August) ETF · MC Trio Equity Buffered ETF
Expense ratio
0.49% · 0.70%
Category
QFLRCvsTRIOC
Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF · MC Trio Equity Buffered ETF
Expense ratio
0.89% · 0.70%
Category
MAUGCvsIFLRC
Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (August) ETF · Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF
Expense ratio
0.49% · 0.89%
Category
QFLRCvsIFLRC
Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF · Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF
Expense ratio
0.89% · 0.89%
Category