Skip to content
etf.net

MAUG vs SFLR

Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (August) ETF

MAUGCCboe

Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF

SFLRCNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

MAUG −0.40pt a year

MAUG0.49%SFLR0.89%

Avg volume · 30D

SFLR 1215.8×the volume

MAUG185SFLR225K

MAUG vs SFLR Performance

Aug 5, 2026 – Nov 5, 2026

−1.4%MAUG−2.8%SFLR

Aug 5, 2026 to Nov 5, 2026. MAUG −1.4%. SFLR −2.8%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−2%0%1%2%Aug 2026Sep 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
MAUG 0.49%, better
SFLR 0.89%
Fund size
MAUG $2M
SFLR $2.25B
1Y total return
MAUG No data
SFLR +3.4%
Yield (12M)
MAUG No data
SFLR 0.25%
Holdings
MAUG 4
SFLR 184
Avg volume (30D)
MAUG 185 sh
SFLR 225K sh, better
NAV per share
MAUG $33.60
SFLR $39.12
52W range

ETF.net Grade

MAUG: Cost 89, Risk 85, Mission not scored, Tradability 40, Holdings not scored, Durability 29. SFLR: Cost 24, Risk 59, Mission not scored, Tradability 78, Holdings 70, Durability 87.
Pillar letters and Scores for MAUG, SFLR, with each pillar’s weight
PillarMAUGSFLR
Cost30% weightA89HigherF24
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightA85HigherB59
Tradability15% weightC40A78Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredA70
Durability5% weightD29A87Higher

Rank among Managed Floor funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. MAUG and SFLR are both graded against the same 5 Managed Floor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Managed Floor⁠

Category · 5 funds
See all 5 ›

SFLR ranks 1st and MAUG 5th of 5 funds in the Managed Floor Category.

  1. Rank 1CSFLRInnovator Equity Managed Floor ETFScore 51
  2. Rank 2CTRIOMC Trio Equity Buffered ETFScore 49
  3. Rank 4CIFLRInnovator International Developed Managed Floor ETFScore 41
  4. Rank 5CMAUGPacer Swan SOS Moderate (August) ETFScore 40

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

MAUGCPacer Swan SOS Moderate (August) ETF

SFLRCInnovator Equity Managed Floor ETF

In short

MAUG No data

SFLR Most protected-equity funds run on a calendar: show up on reset day or take what's left. SFLR ladders one-year options so the hedge is always rolling, and sells short-dated calls to pay for it, on top of a basket of US large caps.

Stated mandate

MAUG No data

SFLR The fund seeks risk-managed exposure to U.S. large-cap companies through a hedging strategy. It uses laddered one-year Flex Options and systematic short-dated call selling to pursue equity-market upside while mitigating losses.

Why people hold it

MAUG No data

  • SFLR The ladder is the whole idea: staggered one-year FLEX options keep the hedge rolling, so there is no single outcome-period start date to time your entry around.innovatoretfs.com
  • You own the shares, not a synthetic stand-in. Roughly 200 US large caps sit underneath, referenced to the Solactive GBS United States 500 Index, with options layered on top.innovatoretfs.com
  • Systematic call selling funds the hedge instead of a fixed upfront drag, and the fund makes distributions on a quarterly schedule.innovatoretfs.com
  • Live since 2022 and one of the larger funds in the floor-and-protection aisle, which shows up as steady day-to-day tradability. Standing sits in the upper half of that peer group.

Worth knowing

MAUG No data

  • SFLR Those calls get paid for somewhere: upside in a fast rally is trimmed. This is a smoother ride than the index, not a full share of it.innovatoretfs.com
  • 0.89% a year lands at the floor cohort's median, not the front of it. CPRY, CPRJ and CPRO run 0.69%, FLJJ 0.74%.
  • The floor is an objective pursued with options, not a guarantee, and the record since the 2022 launch is short by full-market-cycle standards.

Full MAUG profile⁠

Full SFLR profile⁠

MAUG vs SFLR Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

MAUG vs SFLR Cost

Overpaying SFLR vs MAUG

$7,080

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • MAUG 0.49%

    $9,792

  • SFLR 0.89%

    $16,872

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • MAUG 0.49%
  • SFLR 0.89%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530SFLR $16,872MAUG $9,792

Year by year

YearMAUGSFLROverpaying
10$883$1,576$693
20$3,394$5,953$2,559
30$9,792$16,872$7,080

Expense ratio

  • 0.49%MAUG, cheaper
  • 0.89%SFLR
  • Middle half of Managed Floor funds
  • Median 0.89%

MAUG cheapest of 5 funds

SFLR 3rd cheapest of 5 funds

MAUG vs SFLR Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 5, 2026
Yield (12M)
MAUG No data
SFLR 0.25%
Payout (12M)
MAUG None
SFLR $0.10
Last payment
MAUG No data
SFLR $0.02
Ex-dividend
MAUG No data
SFLR Sep 30, 2026
Paid on
MAUG No data
SFLR Oct 2, 2026
Frequency
MAUG No data
SFLR Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2022 to 2026, same scale for both

MAUGAll MAUG payments⁠

No distribution history available.

SFLRQuarterly · 16 paymentsAll SFLR payments⁠
One bar per payment. 16 payments from 2022 to 2026 YTD. Dec 29, 2022 $0.01; Mar 30, 2023 $0.04; Jun 29, 2023 $0.07; Sep 28, 2023 $0.03; Dec 28, 2023 $0.17; Mar 27, 2024 $0.03; Jun 28, 2024 $0.03; Sep 30, 2024 $0.04; Dec 31, 2024 $0.04; Mar 31, 2025 $0.03; Jun 30, 2025 $0.04; Sep 30, 2025 $0.03; Dec 31, 2025 $0.02; Mar 31, 2026 $0.03; Jun 30, 2026 $0.02; Sep 30, 2026 $0.02. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2020232026YTD

MAUG vs SFLR Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
MAUG No dataSFLR 8.8%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
MAUG No dataSFLR 1.26
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
MAUG No dataSFLR −12.1%since Nov 2022
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
MAUG 0.30SFLR 0.68

Popular comparisons

  • MAUGCvsTRIOC

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (August) ETF · MC Trio Equity Buffered ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.70%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • SFLRCvsTRIOC

    Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF · MC Trio Equity Buffered ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.89% · 0.70%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • MAUGCvsQFLRC

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (August) ETF · Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.89%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • SFLRCvsQFLRC

    Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF · Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.89% · 0.89%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • MAUGCvsIFLRC

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (August) ETF · Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.89%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • SFLRCvsIFLRC

    Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF · Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.89% · 0.89%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.