Skip to content
etf.net

MAUG vs TRIO

Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (August) ETF

MAUGCCboe

MC Trio Equity Buffered ETF

TRIOCCboe

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

MAUG −0.21pt a year

MAUG0.49%TRIO0.70%

Avg volume · 30D

TRIO 7.9×the volume

MAUG185TRIO1.46K

MAUG vs TRIO Performance

Aug 5, 2026 – Nov 5, 2026

−1.4%MAUG−2.2%TRIO

Aug 5, 2026 to Nov 5, 2026. MAUG −1.4%. TRIO −2.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−1%0%1%Aug 2026Sep 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
MAUG 0.49%, better
TRIO 0.70%
Fund size
MAUG $2M
TRIO $121M
1Y total return
MAUG No data
TRIO +7.3%
Holdings
MAUG 4
TRIO 7
Avg volume (30D)
MAUG 185 sh
TRIO 1.46K sh, better
NAV per share
MAUG $33.60
TRIO $64.58
52W range

ETF.net Grade

MAUG: Cost 89, Risk 85, Mission not scored, Tradability 40, Holdings not scored, Durability 29. TRIO: Cost 66, Risk 30, Mission not scored, Tradability 38, Holdings not scored, Durability 48.
Pillar letters and Scores for MAUG, TRIO, with each pillar’s weight
PillarMAUGTRIO
Cost30% weightA89HigherB66
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightA85HigherD30
Tradability15% weightC40HigherD38
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightD29C48Higher

Rank among Managed Floor funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. MAUG and TRIO are both graded against the same 5 Managed Floor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Managed Floor⁠

Category · 5 funds
See all 5 ›

TRIO ranks 2nd and MAUG 5th of 5 funds in the Managed Floor Category.

  1. Rank 1CSFLRInnovator Equity Managed Floor ETFScore 51
  2. Rank 2CTRIOMC Trio Equity Buffered ETFScore 49
  3. Rank 3CQFLRInnovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETFScore 44
  4. Rank 4CIFLRInnovator International Developed Managed Floor ETFScore 41
  5. Rank 5CMAUGPacer Swan SOS Moderate (August) ETFScore 40

MAUG vs TRIO Holdings

How MAUG and TRIO differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Countryby domicile85.3%
  • Sector11 Sectors90.3%
  • Asset classStocks100%

Sector

Sector weights in MAUG and TRIO, widest gap first
SectorMore in MAUGMore in TRIOGap
TechnologyMAUG +7.9 points
FinancialsTRIO +2.9 points
IndustrialsTRIO +2.3 points
Health CareTRIO +1.9 points
CommunicationMAUG +1.5 points
MaterialsTRIO +1.0 points
Real EstateTRIO +0.6 points
EnergyTRIO +0.5 points
UtilitiesTRIO +0.4 points
Consumer DiscretionaryMAUG +0.3 points
Consumer StaplesSame weight

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in MAUG and TRIO, widest gap first
CountryMore in MAUGMore in TRIOGap
United StatesMAUG +14.6 points
JapanTRIO +3.6 points
United KingdomTRIO +2.1 points
SwitzerlandTRIO +1.4 points
GermanyTRIO +1.3 points
FranceTRIO +1.2 points
AustraliaTRIO +1.0 points
NetherlandsTRIO +0.9 points
Other countries (19)TRIO +3.1 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • MAUG103.2%
  • TRIO102.7%

Securities held

  • MAUG2
  • TRIO7

Asset class

MAUG
Stocks
TRIO
Stocks

Holdings

  • Only in MAUG2
  • In both0
  • Only in TRIO7

Only in MAUG

2 securities, 100% of MAUG by weight

  • Spy 07/30/2027 8.29 C98.88%
  • Spy 07/30/2027 747.1 P3.56%

Only in TRIO

7 securities, 100% of TRIO by weight

  • Spy 06/17/2027 7.5 C68.62%
  • Iwm 12/18/2026 2.52 C15.61%
  • Efa 06/17/2027 1.09 C14.18%

Weight gaps

MAUG and TRIO share no securities.

All 6 MAUG holdings⁠All TRIO holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

MAUG vs TRIO Cost

Overpaying TRIO vs MAUG

$3,814

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • MAUG 0.49%

    $9,792

  • TRIO 0.70%

    $13,606

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • MAUG 0.49%
  • TRIO 0.70%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530TRIO $13,606MAUG $9,792

Year by year

YearMAUGTRIOOverpaying
10$883$1,250$367
20$3,394$4,760$1,366
30$9,792$13,606$3,814

Expense ratio

  • 0.49%MAUG, cheaper
  • 0.70%TRIO
  • Middle half of Managed Floor funds
  • Median 0.89%

MAUG cheapest of 5 funds

TRIO 2nd cheapest of 5 funds

MAUG vs TRIO Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 5, 2026
Payout (12M)
MAUG None
TRIO No data
Last payment
MAUG No data
TRIO $5.50
Ex-dividend
MAUG No data
TRIO Dec 23, 2025
Paid on
MAUG No data
TRIO Dec 24, 2025
Frequency
MAUG No data
TRIO Irregular

Distribution history

Per share, 2025 to 2026, same scale for both

MAUGAll MAUG payments⁠

No distribution history available.

TRIOIrregular · 1 paymentAll TRIO payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Dec 23, 2025 $5.50. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$52026YTD

MAUG vs TRIO Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
MAUG No dataTRIO 5.6%since Apr 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
MAUG No dataTRIO 1.47since Apr 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
MAUG No dataTRIO −9.9%since Mar 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
MAUG 0.30TRIO 0.52

Popular comparisons

  • MAUGCvsSFLRC

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (August) ETF · Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.89%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • TRIOCvsSFLRC

    MC Trio Equity Buffered ETF · Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.70% · 0.89%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • MAUGCvsQFLRC

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (August) ETF · Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.89%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • TRIOCvsQFLRC

    MC Trio Equity Buffered ETF · Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.70% · 0.89%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • MAUGCvsIFLRC

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (August) ETF · Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.89%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • TRIOCvsIFLRC

    MC Trio Equity Buffered ETF · Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.70% · 0.89%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.