RISN ranks 4th and MDAA 20th of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.
MDAA vs RISN
RISN −0.25pt a year
0.97%0.72%
RISN 38.9×the volume
38014.8K
MDAA vs RISN Performance
+10.2%+5.2%
- MDAA 0.97%
- RISN 0.72%, better
- MDAA $425M
- RISN $69M
- MDAA +10.2%, better
- RISN +5.2%
- MDAA
- RISN 1.05%
- MDAA 63
- RISN 52
- MDAA 380 sh
- RISN 14.8K sh, better
- MDAA $109.49
- RISN $30.86
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | MDAA | RISN |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D39 | A76Higher |
| Mission | A92Higher | A85 |
| Risk | F24 | C47Higher |
| Tradability | D39 | B63Higher |
| Holdings | A84Higher | A80 |
| Durability | A70Higher | B68 |
Rank among Tactical Allocation funds
Same Category. MDAA and RISN are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
MDAAB
RISNA
In short
MDAA A go-anywhere multi-asset fund that names its opponent out loud: the classic 60/40. MDAA chases long-term growth first and capital preservation second, shifting across global stocks and bonds to try to beat that blend.
RISN A tactical blend of U.S. large-cap stocks and U.S. bonds from a values-screening shop, built to chase long-term growth with less turbulence than the large-cap market, at a fee below the typical tactical peer.
Stated mandate
MDAA The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation and, secondarily, capital preservation. It aims to outperform a benchmark consisting of 60% global equities and 40% global bonds over the long term.
RISN The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation with lower volatility than the U.S. large-cap stock market.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
MDAA vs RISN Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
MDAA vs RISN Cost
Overpaying MDAA vs RISN
$4,241
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
MDAA 0.97%
$18,198
RISN 0.72%
$13,957
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | MDAA | RISN | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,712 | $1,284 | $428 |
| 20 | $6,443 | $4,888 | $1,555 |
| 30 | $18,198 | $13,957 | $4,241 |
- 0.97%MDAA
- 0.72%RISN, cheaper
- Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
- Median 0.93%
RISN 12th cheapest of 46 funds
MDAA 28th cheapest of 46 funds
MDAA vs RISN Dividends
- MDAA
- RISN 1.05%
- MDAA
- RISN $0.32
- MDAA $0.46
- RISN $0.08
- MDAA Dec 29, 2025
- RISN Sep 25, 2026
- MDAA Dec 31, 2025
- RISN Oct 1, 2026
- MDAA Irregular
- RISN Quarterly
Distribution history
MDAA vs RISN Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- MDAA 21.0%RISN 11.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- MDAA 0.42RISN 0.77
- Worst fall
- MDAA −14.6%RISN −21.9%
- Market sensitivity
- MDAA 1.36RISN 1.08
MDAA and RISN in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.97% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.72% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.97% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.72% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.97% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.72% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

