Skip to content

MDAA vs RISN

Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF

MDAABNYSE Arca

Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

RISNANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

RISN −0.25pt a year

MDAA0.97%RISN0.72%

Avg volume · 30D

RISN 38.9×the volume

MDAA380RISN14.8K

MDAA vs RISN Performance

Nov 3, 2025 – Nov 3, 2026

+10.2%MDAA+5.2%RISN

Nov 3, 2025 to Nov 3, 2026. MDAA +10.2%. RISN +5.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−5%0%15%20%Nov 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
MDAA 0.97%
RISN 0.72%, better
Fund size
MDAA $425M
RISN $69M
1Y total return
MDAA +10.2%, better
RISN +5.2%
Yield (12M)
MDAA No data
RISN 1.05%
Holdings
MDAA 63
RISN 52
Avg volume (30D)
MDAA 380 sh
RISN 14.8K sh, better
NAV per share
MDAA $109.49
RISN $30.86
52W range

ETF.net Grade

MDAA: Cost 39, Risk 24, Mission 92, Tradability 39, Holdings 84, Durability 70. RISN: Cost 76, Risk 47, Mission 85, Tradability 63, Holdings 80, Durability 68.
Pillar letters and Scores for MDAA, RISN, with each pillar’s weight
PillarMDAARISN
Cost30% weightD39A76Higher
Mission25% weightA92HigherA85
Risk15% weightF24C47Higher
Tradability15% weightD39B63Higher
Holdings10% weightA84HigherA80
Durability5% weightA70HigherB68

Rank among Tactical Allocation funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. MDAA and RISN are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Tactical Allocation⁠

Category · 46 funds
See all 46 ›

RISN ranks 4th and MDAA 20th of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.

  1. Rank 1AENDWCambria Endowment Style ETFScore 81
  2. Rank 2AGMODGMO Dynamic Allocation ETFScore 76
  3. Rank 3APTBDPacer Trendpilot US Bond ETFScore 72
  4. Rank 4ARISNInspire Capital Appreciation ETFScore 71
  5. Rank 5BPBLPGIM Portfolio Ballast ETFScore 69
  6. Rank 20BGMMAGammaRoad Market Navigation ETFScore 55
  7. Rank 20BMDAAMyriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETFScore 55
  8. Rank 20BUSAFAtlas America FundScore 55

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

MDAABMyriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF

RISNAInspire Capital Appreciation ETF

In short

MDAA A go-anywhere multi-asset fund that names its opponent out loud: the classic 60/40. MDAA chases long-term growth first and capital preservation second, shifting across global stocks and bonds to try to beat that blend.

RISN A tactical blend of U.S. large-cap stocks and U.S. bonds from a values-screening shop, built to chase long-term growth with less turbulence than the large-cap market, at a fee below the typical tactical peer.

Stated mandate

MDAA The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation and, secondarily, capital preservation. It aims to outperform a benchmark consisting of 60% global equities and 40% global bonds over the long term.

RISN The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation with lower volatility than the U.S. large-cap stock market.

Why people hold it

  • MDAA The prospectus names the yardstick: 60% global equities, 40% global bonds. Most tactical funds stay vague about what they are actually trying to beat.
  • Capital preservation is written in as the secondary objective, so managing the downside is part of the stated mandate rather than a marketing line.
  • Global reach across asset classes in one ticker, held in a standard 1940 Act ETF wrapper: 1099 tax reporting, no K-1, ordinary ETF plumbing.
  • RISN Charges 0.72% a year, under the going rate for tactical multi-asset funds that actively shift their mix.
  • One ticket holds U.S. large-cap equities alongside U.S. fixed income, with the stated aim of long-term appreciation at lower volatility than U.S. large caps.
  • One of the stronger implementations in a crowded tactical multi-asset field, with a live record going back to its 2020 launch.
  • Pays out quarterly, so the bond sleeve shows up as scheduled cash rather than a once-a-year surprise.

Worth knowing

  • MDAA At 0.97% the fee sits right at the tactical multi-asset median (0.95%), but the cohort's top-rated names run cheaper: ENDW at 0.22%, ONOF at 0.39%. Cost is part of the 60/40 hurdle.
  • Launched in 2025, so the record is short. A tactical allocation process only shows what it is across a full market cycle.
  • Trades lightly next to the category's busiest names, which can mean wider spreads. Limit orders are the usual tool here.
  • RISN Thinly traded and modest in size, so bid-ask spreads can matter more than the fee does. Limit orders are the standard workaround.
  • Tactical means judgment calls: the allocation can look nothing like a fixed stock/bond blend at any given moment.
  • Cheap for tactical, not cheap outright. Peers such as ENDW (0.22%) and ONOF (0.39%) run at a fraction of the fee.

Full MDAA profile⁠

Full RISN profile⁠

MDAA vs RISN Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

MDAA vs RISN Cost

Overpaying MDAA vs RISN

$4,241

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • MDAA 0.97%

    $18,198

  • RISN 0.72%

    $13,957

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • MDAA 0.97%
  • RISN 0.72%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530MDAA $18,198RISN $13,957

Year by year

YearMDAARISNOverpaying
10$1,712$1,284$428
20$6,443$4,888$1,555
30$18,198$13,957$4,241

Expense ratio

  • 0.97%MDAA
  • 0.72%RISN, cheaper
  • Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
  • Median 0.93%

RISN 12th cheapest of 46 funds

MDAA 28th cheapest of 46 funds

MDAA vs RISN Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 3, 2026
Yield (12M)
MDAA No data
RISN 1.05%
Payout (12M)
MDAA No data
RISN $0.32
Last payment
MDAA $0.46
RISN $0.08
Ex-dividend
MDAA Dec 29, 2025
RISN Sep 25, 2026
Paid on
MDAA Dec 31, 2025
RISN Oct 1, 2026
Frequency
MDAA Irregular
RISN Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2020 to 2026, same scale for both

MDAAIrregular · 1 paymentAll MDAA payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2020 to 2026 YTD. Dec 29, 2025 $0.46. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.50202020232026YTD
RISNQuarterly · 24 paymentsAll RISN payments⁠
One bar per payment. 24 payments from 2020 to 2026 YTD. Sep 25, 2020 $0.03; Dec 14, 2020 $1.16; Dec 30, 2020 $0.01; Mar 26, 2021 $0.03; Jun 25, 2021 $0.05; Sep 24, 2021 $0.05; Dec 14, 2021 $2.65; Sep 23, 2022 $0.06; Dec 14, 2022 $0.23; Mar 27, 2023 $0.13; Jun 23, 2023 $0.15; Sep 22, 2023 $0.11; Dec 14, 2023 $0.13; Mar 27, 2024 $0.08; Jun 25, 2024 $0.06; Sep 25, 2024 $0.10; Dec 16, 2024 $0.13; Mar 27, 2025 $0.04; Jun 26, 2025 $0.06; Sep 26, 2025 $0.12; Dec 17, 2025 $0.07; Mar 27, 2026 $0.07; Jun 26, 2026 $0.10; Sep 25, 2026 $0.08. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.50202020232026YTD

MDAA vs RISN Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
MDAA 21.0%since Nov 2025RISN 11.4%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
MDAA 0.42since Nov 2025RISN 0.77
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
MDAA −14.6%since Oct 2025RISN −21.9%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
MDAA 1.36RISN 1.08

MDAA and RISN in the news

Popular comparisons

  • MDAABvsENDWA

    Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF · Cambria Endowment Style ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.97% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RISNAvsENDWA

    Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF · Cambria Endowment Style ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.72% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MDAABvsGMODA

    Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF · GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.97% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RISNAvsGMODA

    Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF · GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.72% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MDAABvsPTBDA

    Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.97% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RISNAvsPTBDA

    Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.72% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.