PXJ ranks 4th and MDST 5th of 7 funds in the Energy Sector Category.
MDST vs PXJ
PXJ −0.17pt a year
0.80%0.63%
MDST 1.1×the volume
64.1K58.6K
MDST vs PXJ Performance
+27.6%+62.4%
- MDST 0.80%
- PXJ 0.63%, better
- MDST $303M
- PXJ $139M
- MDST +27.6%
- PXJ +62.4%, better
- MDST 9.17%, better
- PXJ 2.63%
- MDST 28
- PXJ 33
- MDST 64.1K sh, better
- PXJ 58.6K sh
- MDST $29.49
- PXJ $46.96
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | MDST | PXJ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D32 | C45Higher |
| Mission | C45 | |
| Risk | A75Higher | C46 |
| Tradability | D31 | B58Higher |
| Holdings | C53 | A73Higher |
| Durability | D31 | B55Higher |
Rank among Energy Sector funds
Same Category. MDST and PXJ are both graded against the same 7 Energy Sector funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
MDSTC
PXJC
In short
MDST Midstream pipelines already throw off cash. MDST layers a covered call overlay on an actively picked pipeline and MLP book, then pays it out monthly, in a 1099 wrapper instead of the MLP K-1 shuffle.
PXJ Oilfield services run through a quant filter: PXJ's index ranks drillers, equipment makers and service firms on momentum, quality and value, then holds about 30. Trading since 2005, at 0.63% net of a waiver through August 31, 2028.
Stated mandate
MDST The Fund seeks income by investing at least 80% of its net assets, including certain investment-purpose borrowings, in securities of North American midstream corporations and U.S. master limited partnerships.
PXJ The Fund tracks the Dynamic Oil Services Intellidex Index by normally investing at least 90% of total assets in its constituent common stocks. The index targets 30 U.S. companies supporting oil and gas production, processing, and distribution.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
MDST vs PXJ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
MDST vs PXJ Cost
Overpaying MDST vs PXJ
$2,987
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
MDST 0.80%
$15,346
PXJ 0.63%
$12,359
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | MDST | PXJ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,422 | $1,128 | $294 |
| 20 | $5,393 | $4,311 | $1,082 |
| 30 | $15,346 | $12,359 | $2,987 |
- 0.80%MDST
- 0.63%PXJ, cheaper
- Middle half of Energy Sector funds
- Median 0.63%
PXJ 4th cheapest of 7 funds
MDST 5th cheapest of 7 funds
MDST vs PXJ Dividends
- MDST 9.17%, better
- PXJ 2.63%
- MDST $2.70
- PXJ $1.23
- MDST $0.23
- PXJ $0.44
- MDST Oct 29, 2026
- PXJ Sep 21, 2026
- MDST Pays Nov 3, 2026
- PXJ Sep 25, 2026
- MDST Monthly
- PXJ Quarterly
Distribution history
MDST vs PXJ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- MDST 12.5%PXJ 27.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- MDST 1.09PXJ 0.64
- Worst fall
- MDST −14.6%PXJ −40.1%
- Market sensitivity
- MDST 0.20PXJ 0.65
Popular comparisons
- 0.80% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.63% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.63% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.63% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.