Skip to content

PXJ vs TMLP

Invesco Oil & Gas Services ETF

PXJCNYSE Arca

Tortoise MLP ETF

TMLPCNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

TMLP −0.13pt a year

PXJ0.63%TMLP0.50%

Avg volume · 30D

PXJ 22.4×the volume

PXJ58.6KTMLP2.62K

PXJ vs TMLP Performance

Dec 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+63.7%PXJ+22.0%TMLP

Dec 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. PXJ +63.7%. TMLP +22.0%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%40%Dec 2025Jun 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
PXJ 0.63%
TMLP 0.50%, better
Fund size
PXJ $139M
TMLP $38M
1Y total return
PXJ +62.4%
TMLP No data
Yield (12M)
PXJ 2.63%
TMLP No data
Holdings
PXJ 33
TMLP 4
Avg volume (30D)
PXJ 58.6K sh, better
TMLP 2.62K sh
NAV per share
PXJ $46.96
TMLP $28.91
52W range

ETF.net Grade

PXJ: Cost 45, Risk 46, Mission not scored, Tradability 58, Holdings 73, Durability 55. TMLP: Cost 59, Risk 59, Mission 60, Tradability 30, Holdings not scored, Durability 33.
Pillar letters and Scores for PXJ, TMLP, with each pillar’s weight
PillarPXJTMLP
Cost30% weightC45B59Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredB60
Risk15% weightC46B59Higher
Tradability15% weightB58HigherD30
Holdings10% weightA73Not scored
Durability5% weightB55HigherD33

Rank among Energy Sector funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. PXJ and TMLP are both graded against the same 7 Energy Sector funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Energy Sector⁠

Category · 7 funds
See all 7 ›

TMLP ranks 3rd and PXJ 4th of 7 funds in the Energy Sector Category.

  1. Rank 1BXESState Street SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETFScore 61
  2. Rank 2BMLPXGlobal X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETFScore 56
  3. Rank 3CTMLPTortoise MLP ETFScore 53
  4. Rank 4CPXJInvesco Oil & Gas Services ETFScore 52
  5. Rank 5CMDSTWestwood Salient Enhanced Midstream Income ETFScore 43

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

PXJCInvesco Oil & Gas Services ETF

TMLPCTortoise MLP ETF

In short

PXJ Oilfield services run through a quant filter: PXJ's index ranks drillers, equipment makers and service firms on momentum, quality and value, then holds about 30. Trading since 2005, at 0.63% net of a waiver through August 31, 2028.

TMLP MLP exposure without the K-1 envelope. TMLP takes its index exposure through total return swaps inside a RIC structure, so shareholders get a single Form 1099 and skip the fund-level deferred tax accrual that C-corp MLP funds carry.

Stated mandate

PXJ The Fund tracks the Dynamic Oil Services Intellidex Index by normally investing at least 90% of total assets in its constituent common stocks. The index targets 30 U.S. companies supporting oil and gas production, processing, and distribution.

TMLP The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total-return performance of the Tortoise MLP Index SM.

Why people hold it

  • PXJ Not a cap-weighted mirror. The index scores candidates on price momentum, earnings momentum, quality, management action and value, then reconstitutes four times a year.invesco.com
  • Weight spreads across size tiers rather than piling into the biggest service names, leaving more room for mid- and small-cap drillers than a cap-weighted build.sec.gov
  • Listed in 2005, it has traded through multiple drilling booms and busts, holding about 30 US companies that support oil and gas production, processing and distribution.
  • TMLP Full MLP index exposure via total return swaps in a RIC wrapper: one Form 1099, no K-1s, and none of the fund-level deferred tax liability legacy C-corp MLP funds accrue.tortoisecapital.com
  • Tracks the Tortoise MLP Index, a rules-based benchmark with a 10-plus year history covering 20-some partnerships across energy transport, processing and storage.tortoisecapital.com
  • Home-field advantage: Tortoise launched the first MLP closed-end fund in 2004 and built this index itself rather than licensing someone else's.tortoisecapital.com
  • Pays quarterly, with distributions designed to line up with the cash-generating profile of the index's underlying MLPs.tortoisecapital.com

Worth knowing

  • PXJ 0.63% net of a waiver through August 31, 2028, near the energy-sector median. Gross is 0.77%, so the cost steps up if that waiver is not extended.
  • Cheaper routes into the niche exist: XES charges 0.35%, with no waiver attached. The quant screen is what the difference buys.
  • About 30 stocks in one cyclical industry, tracking drilling and completion budgets more than the broad energy complex, with moderate volume rather than mega-fund liquidity.
  • TMLP 0.50% a year sits a bit above the typical index-tracking ETF. That's the toll for the swap-based, K-1-free plumbing.
  • Swaps carry counterparty risk. The fund may deal with one or a limited number of counterparties, and a counterparty default would reduce the value of your shares.tortoisecapital.com
  • A December 2025 launch: still small and thinly traded, and non-diversified, so spreads can be wider and a short list of names drives the ride.tortoisecapital.com

Full PXJ profile⁠

Full TMLP profile⁠

PXJ vs TMLP Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

PXJ vs TMLP Cost

Overpaying PXJ vs TMLP

$2,380

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • PXJ 0.63%

    $12,359

  • TMLP 0.50%

    $9,979

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • PXJ 0.63%
  • TMLP 0.50%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530PXJ $12,359TMLP $9,979

Year by year

YearPXJTMLPOverpaying
10$1,128$900$228
20$4,311$3,460$851
30$12,359$9,979$2,380

Expense ratio

  • 0.63%PXJ
  • 0.50%TMLP, cheaper
  • Middle half of Energy Sector funds
  • Median 0.63%

TMLP 3rd cheapest of 7 funds

PXJ 4th cheapest of 7 funds

PXJ vs TMLP Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
PXJ 2.63%
TMLP No data
Payout (12M)
PXJ $1.23
TMLP No data
Last payment
PXJ $0.44
TMLP $0.58
Ex-dividend
PXJ Sep 21, 2026
TMLP Sep 24, 2026
Paid on
PXJ Sep 25, 2026
TMLP Sep 25, 2026
Frequency
PXJ Quarterly
TMLP Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

PXJQuarterly · 35 paymentsAll PXJ payments⁠
One bar per payment. 35 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Jun 16, 2017 $0.12; Sep 18, 2017 $0.21; Dec 18, 2017 $0.99; Jun 18, 2018 $0.14; Sep 24, 2018 $0.09; Dec 24, 2018 $0.07; Mar 18, 2019 $0.29; Jun 24, 2019 $0.14; Sep 23, 2019 $0.09; Dec 23, 2019 $0.09; Mar 23, 2020 $0.29; Jun 22, 2020 $0.14; Sep 21, 2020 $0.13; Dec 21, 2020 $0.12; Jun 21, 2021 $0.03; Sep 20, 2021 $0.03; Mar 21, 2022 $0.01; Jun 21, 2022 $0.04; Sep 19, 2022 $0.04; Dec 19, 2022 $0.08; Mar 20, 2023 $0.07; Jun 20, 2023 $0.15; Sep 18, 2023 $0.21; Dec 18, 2023 $0.15; Mar 18, 2024 $0.10; Jun 24, 2024 $0.36; Sep 23, 2024 $0.26; Dec 23, 2024 $0.21; Mar 24, 2025 $0.12; Jun 23, 2025 $0.26; Sep 22, 2025 $0.22; Dec 22, 2025 $0.25; Mar 23, 2026 $0.21; Jun 22, 2026 $0.33; Sep 21, 2026 $0.44. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD
TMLPQuarterly · 4 paymentsAll TMLP payments⁠
One bar per payment. 4 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 31, 2025 $0.01; Mar 26, 2026 $0.58; Jun 25, 2026 $0.50; Sep 24, 2026 $0.58. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD

PXJ vs TMLP Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
PXJ 27.5%TMLP No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
PXJ 0.64TMLP No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
PXJ −40.1%TMLP No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
PXJ 0.65TMLP 0.06

Popular comparisons

  • PXJCvsXESB

    Invesco Oil & Gas Services ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.63% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TMLPCvsXESB

    Tortoise MLP ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PXJCvsMLPXB

    Invesco Oil & Gas Services ETF · Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.63% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TMLPCvsMLPXB

    Tortoise MLP ETF · Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PXJCvsMDSTC

    Invesco Oil & Gas Services ETF · Westwood Salient Enhanced Midstream Income ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.63% · 0.80%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TMLPCvsMDSTC

    Tortoise MLP ETF · Westwood Salient Enhanced Midstream Income ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.80%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.