TSLS ranks 3rd and METD 13th of 43 funds in the Single-Stock Inverse Category.
METD vs TSLS
TSLS −0.07pt a year
1.02%0.95%
METD 1.9×the volume
761K410K
METD vs TSLS Performance
−5.3%+1.0%
- METD 1.02%
- TSLS 0.95%, better
- METD $9M
- TSLS $39M
- METD −5.3%
- TSLS +1.0%, better
- METD 2.40%
- TSLS 3.11%, better
- METD 4
- TSLS 4
- METD 761K sh, better
- TSLS 410K sh
- METD $14.79
- TSLS $50.04
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | METD | TSLS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A78 | A97Higher |
| Mission | A83 | A87Higher |
| Risk | A73 | A75Higher |
| Tradability | C41 | C45Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B62 | A82Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Inverse funds
Same Category. METD and TSLS are both graded against the same 43 Single-Stock Inverse funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
METDA
TSLSA
In short
METD A one-for-one short on Meta, wrapped in an ETF. METD targets 100% of the inverse of Meta's daily move: no leverage multiplier, no margin account, and exposure that resets every day.
TSLS The plain short on Tesla: TSLS aims for -1x the stock's daily move, with no leverage stacked on top. Among the small group of Tesla bear funds, it is the cheapest, and the one that dials risk down rather than up.
Stated mandate
METD The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 100% of the inverse performance of Meta Platforms, Inc. common shares, before fees and expenses.
TSLS The Fund seeks daily inverse investment results by maintaining short exposure to TSLA of approximately -100% of its net assets and generally rebalancing that exposure each trading day.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
METD vs TSLS Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
METD vs TSLS Cost
Overpaying METD vs TSLS
$1,143
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
METD 1.02%
$19,012
TSLS 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | METD | TSLS | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,797 | $1,678 | $119 |
| 20 | $6,746 | $6,322 | $424 |
| 30 | $19,012 | $17,869 | $1,143 |
- 1.02%METD
- 0.95%TSLS, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Inverse funds
- Median 1.05%
TSLS 2nd cheapest of 43 funds
METD 12th cheapest of 43 funds
METD vs TSLS Dividends
- METD 2.40%
- TSLS 3.11%, better
- METD $0.36
- TSLS $1.57
- METD $0.06
- TSLS $0.40
- METD Sep 22, 2026
- TSLS Sep 22, 2026
- METD Sep 29, 2026
- TSLS Sep 29, 2026
- METD Quarterly
- TSLS Quarterly
Distribution history
METD vs TSLS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- METD 34.3%TSLS 51.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- METD −0.43TSLS −0.76
- Worst fall
- METD −50.6%TSLS −90.7%
- Market sensitivity
- METD −1.52TSLS −1.41
Popular comparisons
- 1.02% · 0.96%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.96%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.02% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.02% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.