Skip to content

MKAM vs PTBD

MKAM ETF

MKAMBNasdaq

Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

PTBDANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

MKAM −0.05pt a year

MKAM0.55%PTBD0.60%

Avg volume · 30D

PTBD 63.9×the volume

MKAM291PTBD18.6K

3Y return · a year

MKAM +5.8pt

MKAM+10.7%PTBD+4.9%

MKAM vs PTBD Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+6.5%MKAM−0.1%PTBD

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. MKAM +6.5%. PTBD −0.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−2%2%4%8%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
MKAM 0.55%, better
PTBD 0.60%
Fund size
MKAM $13M
PTBD $83M
1Y total return
MKAM +6.5%, better
PTBD −0.1%
Yield (12M)
MKAM 2.61%
PTBD 6.36%, better
Holdings
MKAM 4
PTBD 1047
Avg volume (30D)
MKAM 291 sh
PTBD 18.6K sh, better
NAV per share
MKAM $32.07
PTBD $18.34
52W range

ETF.net Grade

MKAM: Cost 87, Risk 81, Mission 40, Tradability 28, Holdings 36, Durability 36. PTBD: Cost 83, Risk 60, Mission not scored, Tradability 50, Holdings 90, Durability 83.
Pillar letters and Scores for MKAM, PTBD, with each pillar’s weight
PillarMKAMPTBD
Cost30% weightA87HigherA83
Mission25% weightC40Not scored
Risk15% weightA81HigherB60
Tradability15% weightD28C50Higher
Holdings10% weightD36A90Higher
Durability5% weightD36A83Higher

Rank among Tactical Allocation funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. MKAM and PTBD are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Tactical Allocation⁠

Category · 46 funds
See all 46 ›

PTBD ranks 3rd and MKAM 16th of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.

  1. Rank 1AENDWCambria Endowment Style ETFScore 81
  2. Rank 2AGMODGMO Dynamic Allocation ETFScore 76
  3. Rank 3APTBDPacer Trendpilot US Bond ETFScore 72
  4. Rank 4ARISNInspire Capital Appreciation ETFScore 71
  5. Rank 15BTDSCETC Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETFScore 58
  6. Rank 16BMKAMMKAM ETFScore 57
  7. Rank 16BTDSBETC Cabana Target Beta ETFScore 57

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

MKAMBMKAM ETF

PTBDAPacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

In short

MKAM A dimmer switch on the S&P 500. A trend-and-valuation model can dial US stock exposure from 100% down to zero, parking the rest in Treasuries and cash. Active management for 0.55%, no waiver.

PTBD Trend following, pointed at bonds instead of stocks. A published rulebook shifts PTBD between high yield corporates and intermediate Treasuries as their relative strength changes, dialing credit risk up or down by formula rather than by opinion.

Stated mandate

MKAM The Fund seeks to capture most equity-market returns while taking less volatility and downside risk than other equity investments.

PTBD The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Pacer Trendpilot US Bond Index through a rules-based strategy that alternates between high-yield corporate bonds and U.S. Treasury bonds.

Why people hold it

  • MKAM The mechanism is the product: when the model reads a falling trend or high valuations, equity exposure can fall toward zero, with the rest in Treasuries and money-market funds.sec.gov
  • Two inputs, named in the prospectus: price trend and valuation. Rising trend plus reasonable valuations means more stocks; mixed signals mean a split portfolio.sec.gov
  • At 0.55% with no waiver propping it up, it prices below the typical tactical allocation fund and under peers like PTBD (0.60%) and RISN (0.72%).
  • Pays quarterly, and sits in the upper half of a crowded tactical allocation field.
  • PTBD The rulebook is public and mechanical: high yield measured against Treasuries, compared to its 100-day average, with five straight closes needed to confirm. No manager hunch involved.paceretfs.com
  • 0.60% a year, comfortably below the median for tactical multi-asset funds. Cheap for a strategy that does the reallocating for you.
  • Holds roughly 1,000 bonds in whichever sleeve the signal points to, so no single issuer carries much weight. Income is distributed monthly.
  • Trading since 2019, long enough to have run the rules through a rate shock and a credit wobble, and it sits in the upper tier of the tactical funds we cover.

Worth knowing

  • MKAM Small and thinly traded, so spreads and order size matter more here than the fee. Little funds also carry more closure risk than big ones.
  • Trend models typically exit after a decline is underway and return after a rebound is underway. Whipsaw is the built-in cost of the design.sec.gov
  • Non-diversified, with exposure often expressed through a handful of positions including other ETFs and money-market funds. You own a proprietary model, not an index.sec.govsec.gov 2
  • PTBD Trend rules react, they don't anticipate. A sharp reversal can flip the signal after the move has happened, and the confirmation window means the switch lands days later.paceretfs.com
  • In its risk-on position the portfolio is high yield corporate debt, full stop. That is credit risk, a different animal from Treasury rate risk.paceretfs.com
  • Not one of the heavily traded names in its category, so the spread and a limit order matter more here than with a mega-fund.

Full MKAM profile⁠

Full PTBD profile⁠

MKAM vs PTBD Holdings

As of
How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

MKAM vs PTBD Cost

Overpaying PTBD vs MKAM

$913

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • MKAM 0.55%

    $10,904

  • PTBD 0.60%

    $11,817

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • MKAM 0.55%
  • PTBD 0.60%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530PTBD $11,817MKAM $10,904

Year by year

YearMKAMPTBDOverpaying
10$988$1,076$88
20$3,790$4,116$326
30$10,904$11,817$913

Expense ratio

  • 0.55%MKAM, cheaper
  • 0.60%PTBD
  • Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
  • Median 0.93%

MKAM 7th cheapest of 46 funds

PTBD 8th cheapest of 46 funds

MKAM vs PTBD Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
MKAM 2.61%
PTBD 6.36%, better
Payout (12M)
MKAM $0.84
PTBD $1.17
Last payment
MKAM $0.15
PTBD $0.10
Ex-dividend
MKAM Sep 28, 2026
PTBD Oct 22, 2026
Paid on
MKAM Sep 30, 2026
PTBD Oct 26, 2026
Frequency
MKAM Quarterly
PTBD Monthly

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

MKAMQuarterly · 14 paymentsAll MKAM payments⁠
One bar per payment. 14 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Jun 28, 2023 $0.10; Sep 27, 2023 $0.09; Dec 20, 2023 $0.27; Mar 26, 2024 $0.10; Jun 27, 2024 $0.14; Sep 27, 2024 $0.09; Dec 30, 2024 $0.22; Mar 28, 2025 $0.08; Jun 27, 2025 $0.23; Sep 29, 2025 $0.16; Dec 30, 2025 $0.31; Mar 30, 2026 $0.23; Jun 29, 2026 $0.15; Sep 28, 2026 $0.15. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2520232026YTD
PTBDMonthly · 46 paymentsAll PTBD payments⁠
One bar per payment. 46 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Jan 26, 2023 $0.09; Feb 23, 2023 $0.11; Mar 23, 2023 $0.12; Apr 27, 2023 $0.07; May 25, 2023 $0.04; Jun 22, 2023 $0.09; Jul 27, 2023 $0.16; Aug 24, 2023 $0.12; Sep 21, 2023 $0.12; Oct 26, 2023 $0.14; Nov 22, 2023 $0.11; Dec 27, 2023 $0.17; Jan 25, 2024 $0.09; Feb 22, 2024 $0.11; Mar 21, 2024 $0.12; Apr 25, 2024 $0.14; May 23, 2024 $0.09; Jun 27, 2024 $0.18; Jul 25, 2024 $0.11; Aug 22, 2024 $0.09; Sep 26, 2024 $0.06; Oct 24, 2024 $0.08; Nov 21, 2024 $0.10; Dec 27, 2024 $0.15; Jan 23, 2025 $0.07; Feb 26, 2025 $0.12; Mar 27, 2025 $0.10; Apr 24, 2025 $0.03; May 22, 2025 $0.04; Jun 26, 2025 $0.12; Jul 24, 2025 $0.10; Aug 27, 2025 $0.12; Sep 25, 2025 $0.09; Oct 23, 2025 $0.09; Nov 25, 2025 $0.06; Dec 23, 2025 $0.15; Jan 22, 2026 $0.06; Feb 25, 2026 $0.11; Mar 26, 2026 $0.07; Apr 23, 2026 $0.09; May 21, 2026 $0.07; Jun 25, 2026 $0.12; Jul 23, 2026 $0.10; Aug 27, 2026 $0.15; Sep 24, 2026 $0.09; Oct 22, 2026 $0.10. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2520232026YTD

MKAM vs PTBD Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
MKAM 5.3%PTBD 5.2%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
MKAM 1.11, betterPTBD 0.08
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
MKAM −5.0%since Apr 2023PTBD −24.8%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
MKAM 0.46PTBD 0.74

Popular comparisons

  • MKAMBvsENDWA

    MKAM ETF · Cambria Endowment Style ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.55% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PTBDAvsENDWA

    Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF · Cambria Endowment Style ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MKAMBvsGMODA

    MKAM ETF · GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.55% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PTBDAvsGMODA

    Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF · GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MKAMBvsRISNA

    MKAM ETF · Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.55% · 0.72%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PTBDAvsRISNA

    Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF · Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.72%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.