PTBD ranks 3rd and MKAM 16th of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.
MKAM vs PTBD
MKAM −0.05pt a year
0.55%0.60%
PTBD 63.9×the volume
29118.6K
MKAM +5.8pt
+10.7%+4.9%
MKAM vs PTBD Performance
+6.5%−0.1%
- MKAM 0.55%, better
- PTBD 0.60%
- MKAM $13M
- PTBD $83M
- MKAM +6.5%, better
- PTBD −0.1%
- MKAM 2.61%
- PTBD 6.36%, better
- MKAM 4
- PTBD 1047
- MKAM 291 sh
- PTBD 18.6K sh, better
- MKAM $32.07
- PTBD $18.34
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | MKAM | PTBD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A87Higher | A83 |
| Mission | C40 | |
| Risk | A81Higher | B60 |
| Tradability | D28 | C50Higher |
| Holdings | D36 | A90Higher |
| Durability | D36 | A83Higher |
Rank among Tactical Allocation funds
Same Category. MKAM and PTBD are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
MKAMB
PTBDA
In short
MKAM A dimmer switch on the S&P 500. A trend-and-valuation model can dial US stock exposure from 100% down to zero, parking the rest in Treasuries and cash. Active management for 0.55%, no waiver.
PTBD Trend following, pointed at bonds instead of stocks. A published rulebook shifts PTBD between high yield corporates and intermediate Treasuries as their relative strength changes, dialing credit risk up or down by formula rather than by opinion.
Stated mandate
MKAM The Fund seeks to capture most equity-market returns while taking less volatility and downside risk than other equity investments.
PTBD The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Pacer Trendpilot US Bond Index through a rules-based strategy that alternates between high-yield corporate bonds and U.S. Treasury bonds.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
MKAM vs PTBD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
MKAM vs PTBD Cost
Overpaying PTBD vs MKAM
$913
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
MKAM 0.55%
$10,904
PTBD 0.60%
$11,817
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | MKAM | PTBD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $988 | $1,076 | $88 |
| 20 | $3,790 | $4,116 | $326 |
| 30 | $10,904 | $11,817 | $913 |
- 0.55%MKAM, cheaper
- 0.60%PTBD
- Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
- Median 0.93%
MKAM 7th cheapest of 46 funds
PTBD 8th cheapest of 46 funds
MKAM vs PTBD Dividends
- MKAM 2.61%
- PTBD 6.36%, better
- MKAM $0.84
- PTBD $1.17
- MKAM $0.15
- PTBD $0.10
- MKAM Sep 28, 2026
- PTBD Oct 22, 2026
- MKAM Sep 30, 2026
- PTBD Oct 26, 2026
- MKAM Quarterly
- PTBD Monthly
Distribution history
MKAM vs PTBD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- MKAM 5.3%PTBD 5.2%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- MKAM 1.11, betterPTBD 0.08
- Worst fall
- MKAM −5.0%PTBD −24.8%
- Market sensitivity
- MKAM 0.46PTBD 0.74
Popular comparisons
- 0.55% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.55% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.55% · 0.72%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.72%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.