GMOD ranks 2nd and MKAM 16th of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.
GMOD vs MKAM
GMOD −0.05pt a year
0.50%0.55%
GMOD 40.7×the volume
11.8K291
GMOD vs MKAM Performance
+11.8%+6.5%
- GMOD 0.50%, better
- MKAM 0.55%
- GMOD $49M
- MKAM $13M
- GMOD +11.8%, better
- MKAM +6.5%
- GMOD
- MKAM 2.61%
- GMOD 20
- MKAM 4
- GMOD 11.8K sh, better
- MKAM 291 sh
- GMOD $27.77
- MKAM $32.07
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GMOD | MKAM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A90Higher | A87 |
| Mission | A74Higher | C40 |
| Risk | A75 | A81Higher |
| Tradability | A73Higher | D28 |
| Holdings | B64Higher | D36 |
| Durability | C49Higher | D36 |
Rank among Tactical Allocation funds
Same Category. GMOD and MKAM are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GMODA
MKAMB
In short
GMOD GMO's 7-year asset class forecasts, finally wrapped in an ETF. It tilts toward what the firm's valuation models call cheap and away from what they call expensive, shifting between stocks, bonds and alternatives inside one ticker.
MKAM A dimmer switch on the S&P 500. A trend-and-valuation model can dial US stock exposure from 100% down to zero, parking the rest in Treasuries and cash. Active management for 0.55%, no waiver.
Stated mandate
GMOD The Fund seeks positive total return. It allocates among asset classes using GMO's multi-year return forecasts and relative-risk assessments.
MKAM The Fund seeks to capture most equity-market returns while taking less volatility and downside risk than other equity investments.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GMOD vs MKAM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GMOD vs MKAM Cost
Overpaying MKAM vs GMOD
$925
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GMOD 0.50%
$9,979
MKAM 0.55%
$10,904
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GMOD | MKAM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $988 | $88 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $3,790 | $330 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $10,904 | $925 |
- 0.50%GMOD, cheaper
- 0.55%MKAM
- Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
- Median 0.93%
GMOD 6th cheapest of 46 funds
MKAM 7th cheapest of 46 funds
GMOD vs MKAM Dividends
- GMOD
- MKAM 2.61%
- GMOD
- MKAM $0.84
- GMOD $0.14
- MKAM $0.15
- GMOD Jun 30, 2026
- MKAM Sep 28, 2026
- GMOD Jul 1, 2026
- MKAM Sep 30, 2026
- GMOD Twice a year
- MKAM Quarterly
Distribution history
GMOD vs MKAM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GMOD 8.7%MKAM 5.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- GMOD 0.89MKAM 1.11
- Worst fall
- GMOD −6.5%MKAM −5.0%
- Market sensitivity
- GMOD 0.48MKAM 0.46
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.55% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.55% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.72%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.55% · 0.72%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.