Skip to content

GMOD vs MKAM

GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

GMODANYSE Arca

MKAM ETF

MKAMBNasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

GMOD −0.05pt a year

GMOD0.50%MKAM0.55%

Avg volume · 30D

GMOD 40.7×the volume

GMOD11.8KMKAM291

GMOD vs MKAM Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+11.8%GMOD+6.5%MKAM

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. GMOD +11.8%. MKAM +6.5%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−2.5%0%2.5%10%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
GMOD 0.50%, better
MKAM 0.55%
Fund size
GMOD $49M
MKAM $13M
1Y total return
GMOD +11.8%, better
MKAM +6.5%
Yield (12M)
GMOD No data
MKAM 2.61%
Holdings
GMOD 20
MKAM 4
Avg volume (30D)
GMOD 11.8K sh, better
MKAM 291 sh
NAV per share
GMOD $27.77
MKAM $32.07
52W range

ETF.net Grade

GMOD: Cost 90, Risk 75, Mission 74, Tradability 73, Holdings 64, Durability 49. MKAM: Cost 87, Risk 81, Mission 40, Tradability 28, Holdings 36, Durability 36.
Pillar letters and Scores for GMOD, MKAM, with each pillar’s weight
PillarGMODMKAM
Cost30% weightA90HigherA87
Mission25% weightA74HigherC40
Risk15% weightA75A81Higher
Tradability15% weightA73HigherD28
Holdings10% weightB64HigherD36
Durability5% weightC49HigherD36

Rank among Tactical Allocation funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. GMOD and MKAM are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Tactical Allocation⁠

Category · 46 funds
See all 46 ›

GMOD ranks 2nd and MKAM 16th of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.

  1. Rank 1AENDWCambria Endowment Style ETFScore 81
  2. Rank 2AGMODGMO Dynamic Allocation ETFScore 76
  3. Rank 3APTBDPacer Trendpilot US Bond ETFScore 72
  4. Rank 15BTDSCETC Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETFScore 58
  5. Rank 16BMKAMMKAM ETFScore 57
  6. Rank 16BTDSBETC Cabana Target Beta ETFScore 57

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

GMODAGMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

MKAMBMKAM ETF

In short

GMOD GMO's 7-year asset class forecasts, finally wrapped in an ETF. It tilts toward what the firm's valuation models call cheap and away from what they call expensive, shifting between stocks, bonds and alternatives inside one ticker.

MKAM A dimmer switch on the S&P 500. A trend-and-valuation model can dial US stock exposure from 100% down to zero, parking the rest in Treasuries and cash. Active management for 0.55%, no waiver.

Stated mandate

GMOD The Fund seeks positive total return. It allocates among asset classes using GMO's multi-year return forecasts and relative-risk assessments.

MKAM The Fund seeks to capture most equity-market returns while taking less volatility and downside risk than other equity investments.

Why people hold it

  • GMOD 0.50% all-in, about half the typical fee in its tactical-allocation peer group, and a contractual waiver offsets the fees of the GMO funds it holds so costs are not stacked.sec.gov
  • GMO's first multi-asset strategy in an ETF, run by the asset allocation team behind the firm's long-running 7-year asset class forecasts.gmo.com
  • The equity dial can swing between 40% and 80% of assets under normal conditions, so the fund handles the reallocating rather than you selling positions to do it.gmo.com
  • Sits in the upper tier of a crowded tactical multi-asset group on cost and process clarity.
  • MKAM The mechanism is the product: when the model reads a falling trend or high valuations, equity exposure can fall toward zero, with the rest in Treasuries and money-market funds.sec.gov
  • Two inputs, named in the prospectus: price trend and valuation. Rising trend plus reasonable valuations means more stocks; mixed signals mean a split portfolio.sec.gov
  • At 0.55% with no waiver propping it up, it prices below the typical tactical allocation fund and under peers like PTBD (0.60%) and RISN (0.72%).
  • Pays quarterly, and sits in the upper half of a crowded tactical allocation field.

Worth knowing

  • GMOD New in 2025 and lightly traded so far, which can mean wider bid-ask spreads than the big allocation ETFs.
  • It owns other GMO funds, and the single 0.50% rate leans on a contractual waiver with an expiration date rather than a permanent cap.sec.gov
  • Cheaper tactical allocators exist (ENDW at 0.22%, ONOF at 0.39%), though each runs a different process.
  • MKAM Small and thinly traded, so spreads and order size matter more here than the fee. Little funds also carry more closure risk than big ones.
  • Trend models typically exit after a decline is underway and return after a rebound is underway. Whipsaw is the built-in cost of the design.sec.gov
  • Non-diversified, with exposure often expressed through a handful of positions including other ETFs and money-market funds. You own a proprietary model, not an index.sec.govsec.gov 2

Full GMOD profile⁠

Full MKAM profile⁠

GMOD vs MKAM Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

GMOD vs MKAM Cost

Overpaying MKAM vs GMOD

$925

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • GMOD 0.50%

    $9,979

  • MKAM 0.55%

    $10,904

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • GMOD 0.50%
  • MKAM 0.55%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530MKAM $10,904GMOD $9,979

Year by year

YearGMODMKAMOverpaying
10$900$988$88
20$3,460$3,790$330
30$9,979$10,904$925

Expense ratio

  • 0.50%GMOD, cheaper
  • 0.55%MKAM
  • Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
  • Median 0.93%

GMOD 6th cheapest of 46 funds

MKAM 7th cheapest of 46 funds

GMOD vs MKAM Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
GMOD No data
MKAM 2.61%
Payout (12M)
GMOD No data
MKAM $0.84
Last payment
GMOD $0.14
MKAM $0.15
Ex-dividend
GMOD Jun 30, 2026
MKAM Sep 28, 2026
Paid on
GMOD Jul 1, 2026
MKAM Sep 30, 2026
Frequency
GMOD Twice a year
MKAM Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

GMODTwice a year · 2 paymentsAll GMOD payments⁠
One bar per payment. 2 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Dec 30, 2025 $0.24; Jun 30, 2026 $0.14. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2520232026YTD
MKAMQuarterly · 14 paymentsAll MKAM payments⁠
One bar per payment. 14 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Jun 28, 2023 $0.10; Sep 27, 2023 $0.09; Dec 20, 2023 $0.27; Mar 26, 2024 $0.10; Jun 27, 2024 $0.14; Sep 27, 2024 $0.09; Dec 30, 2024 $0.22; Mar 28, 2025 $0.08; Jun 27, 2025 $0.23; Sep 29, 2025 $0.16; Dec 30, 2025 $0.31; Mar 30, 2026 $0.23; Jun 29, 2026 $0.15; Sep 28, 2026 $0.15. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2520232026YTD

GMOD vs MKAM Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
GMOD 8.7%since Nov 2025MKAM 5.3%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
GMOD 0.89since Nov 2025MKAM 1.11
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
GMOD −6.5%since Oct 2025MKAM −5.0%since Apr 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
GMOD 0.48MKAM 0.46

Popular comparisons

  • GMODAvsENDWA

    GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF · Cambria Endowment Style ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MKAMBvsENDWA

    MKAM ETF · Cambria Endowment Style ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.55% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GMODAvsPTBDA

    GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MKAMBvsPTBDA

    MKAM ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.55% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GMODAvsRISNA

    GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF · Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.72%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MKAMBvsRISNA

    MKAM ETF · Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.55% · 0.72%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.