TSLS ranks 3rd and MSFD 8th of 43 funds in the Single-Stock Inverse Category.
MSFD vs TSLS
TSLS −0.07pt a year
1.02%0.95%
MSFD 4.0×the volume
1.62M410K
MSFD +24.3pt
−14.2%−38.5%
MSFD vs TSLS Performance
−6.2%+1.0%
- MSFD 1.02%
- TSLS 0.95%, better
- MSFD $10M
- TSLS $39M
- MSFD −6.2%
- TSLS +1.0%, better
- MSFD 4.24%, better
- TSLS 3.11%
- MSFD 3
- TSLS 4
- MSFD 1.62M sh, better
- TSLS 410K sh
- MSFD $9.67
- TSLS $50.04
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | MSFD | TSLS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A78 | A97Higher |
| Mission | A99Higher | A87 |
| Risk | A82Higher | A75 |
| Tradability | C41 | C45Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B66 | A82Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Inverse funds
Same Category. MSFD and TSLS are both graded against the same 43 Single-Stock Inverse funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
MSFDA
TSLSA
In short
MSFD Straight inverse Microsoft, with no leverage stacked on top: MSFD targets -100% of MSFT's daily move. One of Direxion's original 2022 single-stock funds, and a buy-side way to express a bearish view.
TSLS The plain short on Tesla: TSLS aims for -1x the stock's daily move, with no leverage stacked on top. Among the small group of Tesla bear funds, it is the cheapest, and the one that dials risk down rather than up.
Stated mandate
MSFD The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to the inverse performance of Microsoft Corporation's common shares.
TSLS The Fund seeks daily inverse investment results by maintaining short exposure to TSLA of approximately -100% of its net assets and generally rebalancing that exposure each trading day.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
MSFD vs TSLS Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
MSFD vs TSLS Cost
Overpaying MSFD vs TSLS
$1,143
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
MSFD 1.02%
$19,012
TSLS 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | MSFD | TSLS | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,797 | $1,678 | $119 |
| 20 | $6,746 | $6,322 | $424 |
| 30 | $19,012 | $17,869 | $1,143 |
- 1.02%MSFD
- 0.95%TSLS, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Inverse funds
- Median 1.05%
TSLS 2nd cheapest of 43 funds
MSFD 12th cheapest of 43 funds
MSFD vs TSLS Dividends
- MSFD 4.24%, better
- TSLS 3.11%
- MSFD $0.42
- TSLS $1.57
- MSFD $0.08
- TSLS $0.40
- MSFD Sep 22, 2026
- TSLS Sep 22, 2026
- MSFD Sep 29, 2026
- TSLS Sep 29, 2026
- MSFD Quarterly
- TSLS Quarterly
Distribution history
MSFD vs TSLS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- MSFD 27.6%, betterTSLS 51.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- MSFD −0.57, betterTSLS −0.76
- Worst fall
- MSFD −62.1%TSLS −90.7%
- Market sensitivity
- MSFD −1.16TSLS −1.41
Popular comparisons
- 1.02% · 0.96%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.96%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.02% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.02% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.