QLD ranks 1st and MSOX 79th of 95 funds in the Leveraged Long (2x & Other) Category.
MSOX vs QLD
0.0%by weight
QLD −0.08pt a year
0.97%0.89%
QLD 2.2×the volume
1.91M4.15M
QLD +110.9pt
−67.5%+43.4%
MSOX vs QLD Performance
−71.9%+10.7%
- MSOX 0.97%
- QLD 0.89%, better
- MSOX $42M
- QLD $13.3B
- MSOX −71.9%
- QLD +10.7%, better
- MSOX
- QLD 0.15%
- MSOX 7
- QLD 113
- MSOX 1.91M sh
- QLD 4.15M sh, better
- MSOX $1.77
- QLD $82.56
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | MSOX | QLD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D29 | A72Higher |
| Mission | C46 | A95Higher |
| Risk | F14 | B66Higher |
| Tradability | C54 | A100Higher |
| Holdings | A72 | |
| Durability | B56 | A81Higher |
Rank among Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. MSOX and QLD are both graded against the same 95 Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
MSOXD
QLDA
In short
MSOX Two times the daily move of AdvisorShares' US cannabis fund, built with swaps. It is the leveraged expression of one of the market's most volatile sector trades, reset every single day.
QLD The 2x dial on the Nasdaq-100. QLD aims for twice the index's daily move, half the dose of the 3x crowd, and it has been running that playbook since 2006. The multiple resets every session.
Stated mandate
MSOX The Fund seeks approximately twice the daily total return of the US Cannabis ETF before fees and expenses, using swap agreements and other leveraged techniques to pursue that daily objective.
QLD The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to twice the daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
MSOX vs QLD Holdings
How MSOX and QLD differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of MSOX and 0.0% of QLD.
Level by level
- Asset class0.0%
- Holdings0.0%
- Sector12.4%
- Country97.3%
Sector
| Sector | More in MSOXMore in QLD | MSOX | QLD |
|---|---|---|---|
| Financials | MSOX +87.6 points | 100.0% | 12.4% |
| Technology | QLD +52.3 points | 0.0% | 52.3% |
| Communication | QLD +9.6 points | 0.0% | 9.6% |
| Consumer Discretionary | QLD +9.2 points | 0.0% | 9.2% |
| Consumer Staples | QLD +5.5 points | 0.0% | 5.5% |
| Industrials | QLD +4.9 points | 0.0% | 4.9% |
| Health Care | QLD +3.9 points | 0.0% | 3.9% |
| Utilities | QLD +1.0 points | 0.0% | 1.0% |
| Materials | QLD +0.9 points | 0.0% | 0.9% |
| Energy | QLD +0.4 points | 0.0% | 0.4% |
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in MSOXMore in QLD | MSOX | QLD |
|---|---|---|---|
| Canada | MSOX +2.7 points | 3.8% | 1.1% |
| United States | QLD +1.1 points | 96.2% | 97.3% |
| Netherlands | QLD +0.9 points | 0.0% | 0.9% |
| Other countries (3) | QLD +0.8 points | 0.0% | 0.8% |
Concentration
- MSOX322.9%
- QLD53.3%
- MSOX2
- QLD112
Asset class
- MSOX
- Leveraged/Inverse
- QLD
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in MSOX2
- In both0
- Only in QLD112
Only in MSOX
2 securities, 100% of MSOX by weight
- Advisorshares Tr Pure Us Cannabis Swap181.42%
- BlackRock Treasury Trust Instl 623.72%
Only in QLD
112 securities, 87.2% of QLD by weight
- Proshares Genius Mny Mkt Etf10.87%
- Apple Inc5.88%
- NVIDIA Corp5.76%
- Microsoft Corp4.53%
- Micron Technology Inc3.22%
- Amazon.com Inc3.03%
- Advanced Micro Devices2.66%
- Tesla Inc2.45%
- Meta Platforms Inc-Class A2.14%
- Walmart Inc1.94%
- Alphabet Inc-Cl A1.92%
- Space Exploration Techn-Cl A1.86%
- Broadcom Inc1.81%
- Alphabet Inc-Cl C1.80%
- Costco Wholesale Corp1.45%
- Palantir Technologies Inc-A1.37%
- Cisco Systems Inc1.33%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2026-12-291.31%
- Intel Corp1.11%
- Applied Materials Inc1.00%
- Lam Research Corp0.96%
- Palo Alto Networks Inc0.96%
- Texas Instruments Inc0.89%
- Netflix Inc0.83%
- Crowdstrike Holdings Inc - A0.83%
- Amgen Inc0.81%
- Linde PLC0.76%
- Gilead Sciences Inc0.68%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2027-01-190.67%
- Kla Corp0.67%
- Analog Devices Inc0.65%
- Shopify Inc - Class A0.61%
- Pepsico Inc0.60%
- Qualcomm Inc0.56%
- Marvell Technology Inc0.56%
- Sandisk Corp0.54%
- T-Mobile Us Inc0.54%
- Intuitive Surgical Inc0.49%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2026-11-030.49%
- Asml Holding Nv-Ny Reg Shs0.47%
- Seagate Technology Holdings0.47%
- Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc0.46%
- Western Digital Corp0.43%
- Starbucks Corp0.38%
- Automatic Data Processing0.38%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2026-12-010.37%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2026-12-240.37%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2027-01-260.37%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2027-02-110.37%
- Booking Holdings Inc0.36%
Weight gaps
MSOX and QLD share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
MSOX vs QLD Cost
Overpaying MSOX vs QLD
$1,326
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
MSOX 0.97%
$18,198
QLD 0.89%
$16,872
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | MSOX | QLD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,712 | $1,576 | $136 |
| 20 | $6,443 | $5,953 | $490 |
| 30 | $18,198 | $16,872 | $1,326 |
- 0.97%MSOX
- 0.89%QLD, cheaper
- Middle half of Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
QLD 28th cheapest of 95 funds
MSOX 68th cheapest of 95 funds
MSOX vs QLD Dividends
- MSOX
- QLD 0.15%
- MSOX None
- QLD $0.12
- MSOX
- QLD $0.03
- MSOX
- QLD Sep 23, 2026
- MSOX
- QLD Sep 29, 2026
- MSOX
- QLD Quarterly
Distribution history
MSOX vs QLD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- MSOX 176.4%QLD 36.7%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- MSOX −0.04QLD 1.04, better
- Worst fall
- MSOX −99.7%QLD −63.7%
- Market sensitivity
- MSOX 1.15QLD 2.46
MSOX and QLD in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.97% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.97% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.97% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
