Skip to content

MTUM vs SIZE

iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF

MTUMBCboe

iShares MSCI USA Size Factor ETF

SIZEANYSE Arca

Overlap

22.1%by weight

Expense ratio

Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.

MTUM0.15%SIZE0.15%

Avg volume · 30D

MTUM 284.5×the volume

MTUM1.48MSIZE5.21K

10Y return · a year

MTUM +3.1pt

MTUM+15.3%SIZE+12.2%

MTUM vs SIZE Performance

Nov 2, 2021 – Nov 2, 2026

+51.3%MTUM+43.0%SIZE

Nov 2, 2021 to Nov 2, 2026. MTUM +51.3%. SIZE +43.0%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−25%0%25%75%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026
Expense ratio
MTUM 0.15%
SIZE 0.15%
Fund size
MTUM $17.8B
SIZE $433M
1Y total return
MTUM +9.0%
SIZE +14.4%, better
Yield (12M)
MTUM 0.67%
SIZE 1.36%, better
Holdings
MTUM 128
SIZE 518
Avg volume (30D)
MTUM 1.48M sh, better
SIZE 5.21K sh
NAV per share
MTUM $284.24
SIZE $180.22
52W range

ETF.net Grade

MTUM: Cost 81, Risk 29, Mission 57, Tradability 75, Holdings 47, Durability 85. SIZE: Cost 81, Risk 66, Mission 93, Tradability 23, Holdings 88, Durability 57.
Pillar letters and Scores for MTUM, SIZE, with each pillar’s weight
PillarMTUMSIZE
Cost30% weightA81A81
Mission25% weightB57A93Higher
Risk15% weightD29B66Higher
Tradability15% weightA75HigherF23
Holdings10% weightC47A88Higher
Durability5% weightA85HigherB57

Rank among US Factor Index funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. MTUM and SIZE are both graded against the same 30 US Factor Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Factor Index⁠

Category · 30 funds
See all 30 ›

SIZE ranks 3rd and MTUM 12th of 30 funds in the US Factor Index Category.

  1. Rank 1AMGVVanguard Morningstar Mega Cap Value ETFScore 78
  2. Rank 2AUSCAXtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETFScore 74
  3. Rank 3ASIZEiShares MSCI USA Size Factor ETFScore 72
  4. Rank 4ADXUVU.S. Vector Equity Portfolio ETF Class SharesScore 70
  5. Rank 11BGARPiShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETFScore 64
  6. Rank 12BMTUMiShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETFScore 63
  7. Rank 13BFDMOFidelity Momentum Factor ETFScore 57

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

MTUMBiShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF

SIZEAiShares MSCI USA Size Factor ETF

In short

MTUM The 2013 original that turned momentum into a mainstream factor bet. MTUM ranks large- and mid-cap US stocks by their 6- and 12-month gains divided by their volatility, so steady climbers outrank wild ones, then rebuilds a roughly 130-stock lineup on a set schedule.

SIZE The size factor without leaving the large-cap pool: SIZE holds roughly 500 US stocks and leans toward the smaller names in that universe, spreading weight away from the mega-cap giants. An iShares factor original from 2013.

Stated mandate

MTUM The fund seeks to track an index of U.S. large- and mid-capitalization stocks with relatively high price momentum. Its strategy uses an index designed to emphasize stocks with stronger momentum characteristics than the MSCI USA parent index.

SIZE The fund seeks to track an index of U.S. stocks that have smaller market capitalizations relative to their peers.

Why people hold it

  • MTUM Momentum here is volatility-adjusted: 6- and 12-month price gains scaled by three-year volatility, which favors steady climbers over the jumpiest movers.msci.com
  • 0.15% a year, a fraction of the typical fee among US momentum funds, and one of the stronger overall implementations in that peer group.
  • Running since 2013 and now a multi-billion-dollar fund that trades actively, which generally means tight spreads and easy fills.
  • The index spreads its rebalance trades over three days into the effective date and caps weights at the issuer level, both aimed at curbing turnover and concentration.msci.com
  • SIZE Charges 0.15%, roughly half the typical fee among US factor ETFs.
  • Tracks the MSCI USA Low Size Index tightly, one of the closer index implementations in its peer group.
  • Roughly 500 holdings, so no single name dominates the way it does in a cap-weighted US index.
  • Running since 2013, one of the original iShares single-factor funds rather than a recent launch.ishares.com

Worth knowing

  • MTUM Roughly 130 names, chosen by what has been working, so sector tilts can get lopsided and stay that way between index reviews.msci.com
  • Sharp reversals are momentum's classic weak spot: the portfolio resets at the scheduled May and November reviews, or sooner only if an ad-hoc trigger fires.msci.com
  • Cheap but not cheapest: JMOM, VFMO and SPMO each charge slightly less for their own version of momentum.
  • SIZE Thinly traded next to headline index funds, so bid-ask spreads can run wider and bigger orders need more care.
  • This is a tilt, not a small-cap fund: the index draws from US large and mid caps and favors the smaller end of that pool.
  • A mid-sized fund by category standards, not one of the asset-gathering giants. Pays quarterly.

Full MTUM profile⁠

Full SIZE profile⁠

MTUM vs SIZE Holdings

How MTUM and SIZE differ

Overlap by weight

22.1%

Shared holdings make up 100% of MTUM and 24.3% of SIZE.

Level by level

  • Holdings125 in both22.1%
  • Sector11 Sectors59.4%
  • Countryby domicile98.5%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

Sector weights in MTUM and SIZE, widest gap first
SectorMore in MTUMMore in SIZE
TechnologyMTUM +33.8 points
FinancialsSIZE +10.5 points
Consumer DiscretionarySIZE +7.1 points
IndustrialsSIZE +6.1 points
EnergyMTUM +5.6 points
UtilitiesSIZE +5.0 points
MaterialsSIZE +3.9 points
Consumer StaplesSIZE +2.6 points
Health CareSIZE +2.6 points
Real EstateSIZE +2.7 points
CommunicationMTUM +1.4 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in MTUM and SIZE, widest gap first
CountryMore in MTUMMore in SIZE
United StatesMTUM +1.4 points
Other countries (8)SIZE +1.4 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • MTUM34.3%
  • SIZE3.7%

Securities held

  • MTUM125
  • SIZE515

Asset class

MTUM
Equity
SIZE
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in MTUM0
  • In both125
  • Only in SIZE390

Only in MTUM

0 securities, 0.0% of MTUM by weight

Only in SIZE

390 securities, 75.7% of SIZE by weight

  • Atlassian Corp Class A0.42%
  • Natera0.40%
  • Veeva Systems Class A0.36%

Weight gaps

The 100 widest of 125 Holdings in both funds.

Holding weights in MTUM and SIZE, widest gap first
HoldingMore in MTUMMore in SIZE
Advanced Micro DevicesAMDMTUM +5.55 points
Micron TechnologyMUMTUM +4.81 points
Johnson & JohnsonJNJMTUM +3.50 points
Cisco Systems IncCSCOMTUM +3.45 points
Exxonmobil Holdings CorpXOMMTUM +3.05 points
Intel CorporationINTCMTUM +2.79 points
Palo Alto NetworksPANWMTUM +2.50 points
Applied Material IncAMATMTUM +2.47 points

All 125 MTUM holdings⁠All 515 SIZE holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

MTUM vs SIZE Cost

Same expense ratio

$3,137

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • MTUM 0.15%

    $3,137

  • SIZE 0.15%

    $3,137

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • MTUM 0.15%
  • SIZE 0.15%
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$1K$2K$3K$4K051015202530MTUM $3,137SIZE $3,137

Year by year

YearMTUMSIZE
10$274$274
20$1,071$1,071
30$3,137$3,137

Expense ratio

  • 0.15%MTUM
  • 0.15%SIZE
  • Middle half of US Factor Index funds
  • Median 0.30%

MTUM 5th cheapest of 30 funds

SIZE 5th cheapest of 30 funds

MTUM vs SIZE Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Yield (12M)
MTUM 0.67%
SIZE 1.36%, better
Payout (12M)
MTUM $1.85
SIZE $2.47
Last payment
MTUM $0.60
SIZE $0.65
Ex-dividend
MTUM Sep 15, 2026
SIZE Sep 15, 2026
Paid on
MTUM Sep 18, 2026
SIZE Sep 18, 2026
Frequency
MTUM Quarterly
SIZE Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

MTUMQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll MTUM payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 24, 2017 $0.24; Jun 27, 2017 $0.24; Sep 26, 2017 $0.27; Dec 21, 2017 $0.31; Mar 22, 2018 $0.27; Jun 26, 2018 $0.34; Sep 26, 2018 $0.26; Dec 17, 2018 $0.40; Mar 20, 2019 $0.47; Jun 17, 2019 $0.45; Sep 24, 2019 $0.42; Dec 16, 2019 $0.50; Mar 25, 2020 $0.45; Jun 15, 2020 $0.35; Sep 23, 2020 $0.24; Dec 14, 2020 $0.31; Mar 25, 2021 $0.09; Jun 10, 2021 $0.13; Sep 24, 2021 $0.33; Dec 13, 2021 $0.44; Mar 24, 2022 $0.38; Jun 9, 2022 $0.37; Sep 26, 2022 $1.03; Dec 13, 2022 $0.84; Mar 23, 2023 $0.80; Jun 7, 2023 $0.54; Sep 26, 2023 $0.41; Dec 20, 2023 $0.36; Mar 21, 2024 $0.16; Jun 11, 2024 $0.20; Sep 25, 2024 $0.44; Dec 17, 2024 $0.75; Mar 18, 2025 $0.53; Jun 16, 2025 $0.47; Sep 16, 2025 $0.60; Dec 16, 2025 $0.67; Mar 17, 2026 $0.22; Jun 15, 2026 $0.36; Sep 15, 2026 $0.60. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD
SIZEQuarterly · 41 paymentsAll SIZE payments⁠
One bar per payment. 41 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 24, 2017 $0.28; Jun 27, 2017 $0.32; Sep 26, 2017 $0.46; Dec 21, 2017 $0.27; Mar 22, 2018 $0.31; Jun 26, 2018 $0.56; Sep 26, 2018 $0.55; Dec 17, 2018 $0.38; Dec 28, 2018 $0.07; Mar 20, 2019 $0.21; Jun 17, 2019 $0.42; Sep 24, 2019 $0.36; Dec 16, 2019 $0.31; Dec 30, 2019 $0.02; Mar 25, 2020 $0.43; Jun 15, 2020 $0.35; Sep 23, 2020 $0.43; Dec 14, 2020 $0.39; Mar 25, 2021 $0.35; Jun 10, 2021 $0.37; Sep 24, 2021 $0.53; Dec 13, 2021 $0.38; Mar 24, 2022 $0.48; Jun 9, 2022 $0.45; Sep 26, 2022 $0.54; Dec 13, 2022 $0.35; Mar 23, 2023 $0.46; Jun 7, 2023 $0.40; Sep 26, 2023 $0.55; Dec 20, 2023 $0.46; Mar 21, 2024 $0.54; Jun 11, 2024 $0.42; Sep 25, 2024 $0.62; Dec 17, 2024 $0.68; Mar 18, 2025 $0.50; Jun 16, 2025 $0.54; Sep 16, 2025 $0.63; Dec 16, 2025 $0.75; Mar 17, 2026 $0.57; Jun 15, 2026 $0.49; Sep 15, 2026 $0.65. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD

MTUM vs SIZE Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • MTUM
  • SIZE
Nov 2, 2021 to Nov 2, 2026. Worst fall: MTUM −32.3% · Jun 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−30%−20%−10%0%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
MTUM 21.6%SIZE 13.0%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
MTUM 1.07, betterSIZE 1.06
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
MTUM −32.3%SIZE −24.0%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
MTUM 1.24SIZE 0.97

Popular comparisons

  • MTUMBvsMGVA

    iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF · Vanguard Morningstar Mega Cap Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.15% · 0.05%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SIZEAvsMGVA

    iShares MSCI USA Size Factor ETF · Vanguard Morningstar Mega Cap Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.15% · 0.05%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MTUMBvsUSCAA

    iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF · Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.15% · 0.07%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SIZEAvsUSCAA

    iShares MSCI USA Size Factor ETF · Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.15% · 0.07%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MTUMBvsDXUVA

    iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF · U.S. Vector Equity Portfolio ETF Class Shares

    Expense ratio
    0.15% · 0.25%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SIZEAvsDXUVA

    iShares MSCI USA Size Factor ETF · U.S. Vector Equity Portfolio ETF Class Shares

    Expense ratio
    0.15% · 0.25%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.