SCMB ranks 4th and MUST 27th of 63 funds in the Other Municipal Bond Category.
MUST vs SCMB
SCMB −0.20pt a year
0.23%0.03%
SCMB 14.9×the volume
220K3.28M
MUST +0.2pt
+3.9%+3.7%
MUST vs SCMB Performance
−0.9%−0.5%
- MUST 0.23%
- SCMB 0.03%, better
- MUST $534M
- SCMB $4.07B
- MUST −0.9%
- SCMB −0.5%, better
- MUST 3.82%
- SCMB 3.97%, better
- MUST 589
- SCMB 8205
- MUST 220K sh
- SCMB 3.28M sh, better
- MUST $19.86
- SCMB $24.87
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | MUST | SCMB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A77 | A99Higher |
| Mission | B55 | A96Higher |
| Risk | C42 | C46Higher |
| Tradability | C44 | A81Higher |
| Holdings | A81 | A81 |
| Durability | C52 | A72Higher |
Rank among Other Municipal Bond funds
Same Category. MUST and SCMB are both graded against the same 63 Other Municipal Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
MUSTB
SCMBA
In short
MUST Most muni index funds just buy the market by size. MUST tracks a Columbia-built index that carves the tax-exempt market into five fixed slices, screens out tobacco bonds, territory paper and California debt, and pays monthly.
SCMB Schwab's take on the core muni sleeve: three basis points, thousands of AMT-free bonds from across the country, and a monthly distribution. Bottom-of-the-table pricing, no frills attached.
Stated mandate
MUST The Fund is a passive ETF designed to track the Beta Advantage Multi-Sector Municipal Bond Index before fees and expenses.
SCMB The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of an index representing the U.S. AMT-free municipal bond market.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
MUST vs SCMB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
MUST vs SCMB Cost
Overpaying MUST vs SCMB
$4,121
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
MUST 0.23%
$4,759
SCMB 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | MUST | SCMB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $419 | $55 | $364 |
| 20 | $1,630 | $216 | $1,414 |
| 30 | $4,759 | $638 | $4,121 |
- 0.23%MUST
- 0.03%SCMB, cheaper
- Middle half of Other Municipal Bond funds
- Median 0.30%
SCMB cheapest of 63 funds
MUST 15th cheapest of 63 funds
MUST vs SCMB Dividends
- MUST 3.82%
- SCMB 3.97%, better
- MUST $0.75
- SCMB $0.98
- MUST $0.06
- SCMB $0.07
- MUST Nov 2, 2026
- SCMB Nov 2, 2026
- MUST Pays Nov 4, 2026
- SCMB Pays Nov 6, 2026
- MUST Monthly
- SCMB Monthly
Distribution history
MUST vs SCMB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- MUST 6.6%SCMB 5.9%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- MUST −0.02, betterSCMB −0.04
- Worst fall
- MUST −13.3%SCMB −6.7%
- Market sensitivity
- MUST 1.01SCMB 0.96
Popular comparisons
- 0.23% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.23% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.23% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.