Skip to content
etf.net

NAPR vs QQMY

Innovator Nasdaq 100 Power Buffer ETF - April

NAPRCCboe

Corgi Growth & Technology 15% Structured Buffer ETF - May Series

QQMYCCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

QQMY −0.49pt a year

NAPR0.79%QQMY0.30%

Avg volume · 30D

NAPR 2.4×the volume

NAPR5.42KQQMY2.29K

NAPR vs QQMY Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

+2.1%NAPR+1.6%QQMY

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. NAPR +2.1%. QQMY +1.6%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%3%4%5%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
NAPR 0.79%
QQMY 0.30%, better
Fund size
NAPR $205M
QQMY $2M
1Y total return
NAPR +13.5%
QQMY No data
Holdings
NAPR 3
QQMY 4
Avg volume (30D)
NAPR 5.42K sh, better
QQMY 2.29K sh
NAV per share
NAPR $60.28
QQMY $25.82
52W range

ETF.net Grade

NAPR: Cost 39, Risk 64, Mission not scored, Tradability 58, Holdings not scored, Durability 79. QQMY: Cost 87, Risk 57, Mission not scored, Tradability 18, Holdings not scored, Durability 21.
Pillar letters and Scores for NAPR, QQMY, with each pillar’s weight
PillarNAPRQQMY
Cost30% weightD39A87Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightB64HigherB57
Tradability15% weightB58HigherF18
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightA79HigherF21

Rank among Nasdaq-100 Buffer 15% funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. NAPR and QQMY are both graded against the same 15 Nasdaq-100 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Nasdaq-100 Buffer 15%⁠

Category · 15 funds
See all 15 ›

NAPR ranks 4th and QQMY 8th of 15 funds in the Nasdaq-100 Buffer 15% Category.

  1. Rank 1BQBQFAllianzIM Growth 100 Buffer15 ETFScore 58
  2. Rank 2CNJANInnovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETFScore 54
  3. Rank 3CNOCTInnovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETFScore 53
  4. Rank 4CNAPRInnovator Nasdaq 100 Power Buffer ETF - AprilScore 52
  5. Rank 4CNJULInnovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - JulyScore 52
  6. Rank 8CQQJLCorgi Growth & Technology 15% Structured Buffer ETF - July SeriesScore 40
  7. Rank 8CQQMYCorgi Growth & Technology 15% Structured Buffer ETF - May SeriesScore 40
  8. Rank 14DQMFEFT Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer ETF - FebruaryScore 36

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

NAPRCInnovator Nasdaq 100 Power Buffer ETF - April

QQMYCCorgi Growth & Technology 15% Structured Buffer ETF - May Series

In short

NAPR A one-year seatbelt on the Nasdaq-100. NAPR aims to absorb the first 15% of losses in the Nasdaq-100 ETF it references over each April-to-March stretch, in exchange for a ceiling on gains that is reset every April.

QQMY No data

Stated mandate

NAPR The Fund seeks to track the return of the Invesco QQQ Trust (QQQ), subject to a predetermined upside cap and protection against the first 15% of losses during the outcome period.

QQMY No data

Why people hold it

  • NAPR Deep cushion by design: the structure targets the first 15 percentage points of reference-ETF losses over the outcome period, so you take the hit only past that line.innovatoretfs.com
  • It rolls instead of expiring. Every April 1 the buffer resets and a fresh cap is struck for the next twelve months, so the position keeps running without you rebuilding it.innovatoretfs.com
  • Running since 2020, this April vintage has several completed outcome periods behind it, back when defined-outcome funds were still a curiosity rather than a shelf.
  • The 0.79% fee sits right at the median for Nasdaq-100 buffer funds, and the overall build lands in the upper half of that peer group.

QQMY No data

Worth knowing

  • NAPR The cushion is paid for with a ceiling. Upside is capped at a level struck each April, so a blistering Nasdaq year above that cap is return you watch rather than collect.innovatoretfs.com
  • Terms are built for the full April-to-March period. Buy mid-period and your personal cushion and ceiling differ from the headline numbers, sometimes a lot.innovatoretfs.com
  • Mid-pack on cost, not cheap: PBQQ runs 0.50% and the Calamos Nasdaq-100 series 0.69%. Shares also trade thinly, which can widen the spread at the point of entry.

QQMY No data

Full NAPR profile⁠

Full QQMY profile⁠

NAPR vs QQMY Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

NAPR vs QQMY Cost

Overpaying NAPR vs QQMY

$9,025

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • NAPR 0.79%

    $15,174

  • QQMY 0.30%

    $6,149

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • NAPR 0.79%
  • QQMY 0.30%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530NAPR $15,174QQMY $6,149

Year by year

YearNAPRQQMYOverpaying
10$1,405$545$860
20$5,331$2,113$3,218
30$15,174$6,149$9,025

Expense ratio

  • 0.79%NAPR
  • 0.30%QQMY, cheaper
  • Middle half of Nasdaq-100 Buffer 15% funds
  • Median 0.79%

QQMY cheapest of 15 funds

NAPR 8th cheapest of 15 funds

NAPR vs QQMY Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
NAPR None
QQMY None

Distribution history

NAPRAll NAPR payments⁠

No distribution history available.

QQMYAll QQMY payments⁠

No distribution history available.

NAPR vs QQMY Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
NAPR 7.2%QQMY No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
NAPR 1.13QQMY No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
NAPR −16.5%QQMY No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
NAPR 0.48QQMY 0.95

Popular comparisons

  • NAPRCvsQBQFB

    Innovator Nasdaq 100 Power Buffer ETF - April · AllianzIM Growth 100 Buffer15 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • QQMYCvsQBQFB

    Corgi Growth & Technology 15% Structured Buffer ETF - May Series · AllianzIM Growth 100 Buffer15 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • NAPRCvsNJANC

    Innovator Nasdaq 100 Power Buffer ETF - April · Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • QQMYCvsNJANC

    Corgi Growth & Technology 15% Structured Buffer ETF - May Series · Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • NAPRCvsNOCTC

    Innovator Nasdaq 100 Power Buffer ETF - April · Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • QQMYCvsNOCTC

    Corgi Growth & Technology 15% Structured Buffer ETF - May Series · Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.