Skip to content

NBDS vs XT

Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF

NBDSCNYSE Arca

iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF

XTANasdaq

Overlap

14.2%by weight

Expense ratio

XT −0.19pt a year

NBDS0.65%XT0.46%

Avg volume · 30D

XT 3.2×the volume

NBDS21.6KXT69.1K

3Y return · a year

XT +0.5pt

NBDS+22.6%XT+23.1%

NBDS vs XT Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+0.6%NBDS+20.1%XT

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. NBDS +0.6%. XT +20.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%−10%10%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
NBDS 0.65%
XT 0.46%, better
Fund size
NBDS $179M
XT $3.98B
1Y total return
NBDS +0.6%
XT +20.1%, better
Yield (12M)
NBDS No data
XT 6.82%
Holdings
NBDS 30
XT 216
Avg volume (30D)
NBDS 21.6K sh
XT 69.1K sh, better
NAV per share
NBDS $40.25
XT $83.53
52W range

ETF.net Grade

NBDS: Cost 53, Risk 36, Mission not scored, Tradability 68, Holdings 41, Durability 45. XT: Cost 95, Risk 91, Mission not scored, Tradability 77, Holdings 66, Durability 96.
Pillar letters and Scores for NBDS, XT, with each pillar’s weight
PillarNBDSXT
Cost30% weightC53A95Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightD36A91Higher
Tradability15% weightB68A77Higher
Holdings10% weightC41B66Higher
Durability5% weightC45A96Higher

Rank among Disruptive Innovation funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. NBDS and XT are both graded against the same 30 Disruptive Innovation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Disruptive Innovation⁠

Category · 30 funds
See all 30 ›

XT ranks 1st and NBDS 14th of 30 funds in the Disruptive Innovation Category.

  1. Rank 1AXTiShares Future Exponential Technologies ETFScore 86
  2. Rank 2AKOMPState Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETFScore 83
  3. Rank 13BDRUPGraniteShares Nasdaq Select Disruptors ETFScore 54
  4. Rank 14CNBDSNeuberger Berman Disrupters ETFScore 50
  5. Rank 15CGXDWGlobal X Dorsey Wright Thematic ETFScore 48

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

NBDSCNeuberger Berman Disrupters ETF

XTAiShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF

In short

NBDS Most disruption funds hand the job to a rulebook. NBDS hands it to Neuberger Berman's analysts: roughly 30 hand-picked companies whose technologies or services may reshape their markets, priced at the category's going rate.

XT Innovation, spread thin on purpose. XT holds roughly 200 global companies scored by Morningstar analysts for exposure to a handful of exponential tech themes, so no single moonshot carries the fund.

Stated mandate

NBDS The Fund targets companies offering differentiated solutions, technologies, or services that may create or reshape markets, using internal research and analysis to identify such businesses.

XT XT seeks to track an index of stocks from developed and emerging markets whose companies create or use exponential technologies. The strategy targets technologies with potential economic benefits, including the ability to displace older technologies or create new markets.

Why people hold it

  • NBDS Human stock-picking, not a screen. Managers use internal research to hunt companies with differentiated solutions, technologies or services that may create or reshape markets.
  • Concentrated by design: about 30 names, so a winner actually moves the needle instead of getting diluted inside a sprawling innovation basket.
  • Active management at index-fund pricing for this corner: the 0.65% expense ratio sits right at the median for disruptive-innovation ETFs.
  • Holds up well against a crowded field, landing in the upper half of its disruptive-innovation peer group on our overall read.
  • XT Cheap for the theme at 0.46% a year, below the typical fee in its disruptive-innovation cohort and under peers like TRFM and FDTX.
  • Human fingerprint on the stock list: Morningstar equity analysts score companies on theme exposure instead of sorting by keywords or revenue tags.sec.govcontentstack.io
  • Global by construction (developed and emerging markets) and not fenced into the tech sector, so a drugmaker or an industrial can qualify on theme exposure.sec.gov
  • Launched in 2015 and now a multi-billion-dollar iShares fund, it stands among the stronger builds in its innovation peer group.ishares.com

Worth knowing

  • NBDS Thinly traded. Shares change hands lightly, which can mean wider gaps between buy and sell prices than the big names in the theme.
  • Cheaper index routes to similar ground exist, including KOMP at 0.20% and XT at 0.46%.
  • A 30-stock portfolio of high-growth disruptors concentrates risk, and the fund only launched in 2022, so the track record is short.
  • XT The index has been reworked since launch (weighting scheme, theme list), and themes get an annual review, so today's tilt is not fixed forever.morningstar.comsec.gov
  • Moderately traded rather than a household name, which can mean wider spreads than the biggest tech ETFs.
  • About 200 positions dilutes any single breakout winner, and distributions land only once or twice a year.

Full NBDS profile⁠

Full XT profile⁠

NBDS vs XT Holdings

How NBDS and XT differ

Overlap by weight

14.2%

Shared holdings make up 40.3% of NBDS and 15.4% of XT.

Level by level

  • Holdings11 in both14.2%
  • Countryby domicile79.4%
  • Sector10 Sectors85.1%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

Sector weights in NBDS and XT, widest gap first
SectorMore in NBDSMore in XT
Health CareXT +11.6 points
TechnologyNBDS +11.6 points
FinancialsNBDS +1.9 points
Consumer DiscretionaryXT +1.5 points
MaterialsXT +1.3 points
CommunicationNBDS +1.1 points
UtilitiesXT +0.3 points
IndustrialsNBDS +0.2 points
EnergySame weight
Real EstateSame weight

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in NBDS and XT, widest gap first
CountryMore in NBDSMore in XT
United StatesNBDS +11.7 points
CanadaNBDS +4.3 points
NetherlandsNBDS +4.1 points
United KingdomXT +3.7 points
SwitzerlandXT +3.1 points
JapanXT +3.1 points
GermanyXT +2.7 points
TaiwanXT +2.1 points
Other countries (5)XT +5.4 points

Outside the US: XT 74% developed, 26% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • NBDS48.2%
  • XT36.5%

Securities held

  • NBDS30
  • XT193

Asset class

NBDS
Equity
XT
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in NBDS19
  • In both11
  • Only in XT182

Only in NBDS

19 securities, 59.7% of NBDS by weight

  • Glaukos Corp Common Stock5.59%
  • Definium Therapeutics Inc Common Stock4.79%
  • Protagonist Therapeutics Inc Common Stock4.39%

Only in XT

182 securities, 84.3% of XT by weight

  • Eli Lilly4.61%
  • Texas Instrument4.61%
  • Microsoft4.09%

Weight gaps

All 11 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in NBDS and XT, widest gap first
HoldingMore in NBDSMore in XT
Advanced Micro Devices Common StockAMDNBDS +4.96 points
Snowflake Inc Common StockSNOWNBDS +4.68 points
NVIDIA Corp Common StockNVDANBDS +3.68 points
Monolithic Power Systems Inc Common StockMPWRNBDS +3.29 points
Bloom Energy Corp A Common StockBENBDS +2.79 points
Tradeweb Markets Inc Class A Common StockTWNBDS +2.29 points
Western Digital Corp Common StockWDCNBDS +1.95 points
Intuitive Surgical Inc Common StockISRGNBDS +1.58 points

All 29 NBDS holdings⁠All 193 XT holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

NBDS vs XT Cost

Overpaying NBDS vs XT

$3,487

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • NBDS 0.65%

    $12,717

  • XT 0.46%

    $9,230

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • NBDS 0.65%
  • XT 0.46%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530NBDS $12,717XT $9,230

Year by year

YearNBDSXTOverpaying
10$1,163$830$333
20$4,440$3,195$1,245
30$12,717$9,230$3,487

Expense ratio

  • 0.65%NBDS
  • 0.46%XT, cheaper
  • Middle half of Disruptive Innovation funds
  • Median 0.65%

XT 3rd cheapest of 30 funds

NBDS 12th cheapest of 30 funds

NBDS vs XT Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
NBDS No data
XT 6.82%
Payout (12M)
NBDS No data
XT $5.69
Last payment
NBDS $0.13
XT $0.36
Ex-dividend
NBDS Dec 19, 2025
XT Jun 15, 2026
Paid on
NBDS Dec 24, 2025
XT Jun 18, 2026
Frequency
NBDS Irregular
XT Twice a year

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

NBDSIrregular · 1 paymentAll NBDS payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 19, 2025 $0.13. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$52017202020232026YTD
XTTwice a year · 23 paymentsAll XT payments⁠
One bar per payment. 23 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Jun 20, 2017 $0.24; Dec 21, 2017 $0.10; Dec 28, 2017 $0.0072; Jun 19, 2018 $0.29; Dec 18, 2018 $0.18; Dec 28, 2018 $0.02; Jun 17, 2019 $0.36; Dec 16, 2019 $0.30; Jun 15, 2020 $0.24; Dec 14, 2020 $0.19; Dec 30, 2020 $0.01; Jun 10, 2021 $0.27; Dec 13, 2021 $0.28; Jun 9, 2022 $0.22; Dec 13, 2022 $0.15; Jun 7, 2023 $0.14; Dec 20, 2023 $0.11; Jun 11, 2024 $0.16; Dec 17, 2024 $0.22; Dec 30, 2024 $0.0094; Jun 16, 2025 $0.21; Dec 16, 2025 $5.33; Jun 15, 2026 $0.36. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$52017202020232026YTD

NBDS vs XT Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
NBDS 23.6%XT 16.5%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
NBDS 0.80XT 1.08, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
NBDS −29.8%since Apr 2022XT −34.4%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
NBDS 1.52XT 1.35

NBDS and XT in the news

Popular comparisons

  • NBDSCvsKOMPA

    Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.20%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XTAvsKOMPA

    iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.46% · 0.20%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • NBDSCvsTRFMA

    Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF · AAM Transformers ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XTAvsTRFMA

    iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF · AAM Transformers ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.46% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • NBDSCvsXITKA

    Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF · State Street SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XTAvsXITKA

    iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF · State Street SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.46% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.