Skip to content

TRFM vs XT

AAM Transformers ETF

TRFMANYSE Arca

iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF

XTANasdaq

Overlap

18.6%by weight

Expense ratio

XT −0.03pt a year

TRFM0.49%XT0.46%

Avg volume · 30D

XT 1.7×the volume

TRFM40.1KXT69.1K

TRFM vs XT Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+5.8%TRFM+20.1%XT

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. TRFM +5.8%. XT +20.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−10%0%10%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
TRFM 0.49%
XT 0.46%, better
Fund size
TRFM $313M
XT $3.98B
1Y total return
TRFM +5.8%
XT +20.1%, better
Yield (12M)
TRFM No data
XT 6.82%
Holdings
TRFM 266
XT 216
Avg volume (30D)
TRFM 40.1K sh
XT 69.1K sh, better
NAV per share
TRFM $53.79
XT $83.53
52W range

ETF.net Grade

TRFM: Cost 81, Risk 66, Mission not scored, Tradability 70, Holdings 89, Durability 50. XT: Cost 95, Risk 91, Mission not scored, Tradability 77, Holdings 66, Durability 96.
Pillar letters and Scores for TRFM, XT, with each pillar’s weight
PillarTRFMXT
Cost30% weightA81A95Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightB66A91Higher
Tradability15% weightA70A77Higher
Holdings10% weightA89HigherB66
Durability5% weightC50A96Higher

Rank among Disruptive Innovation funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. TRFM and XT are both graded against the same 30 Disruptive Innovation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Disruptive Innovation⁠

Category · 30 funds
See all 30 ›

XT ranks 1st and TRFM 3rd of 30 funds in the Disruptive Innovation Category.

  1. Rank 1AXTiShares Future Exponential Technologies ETFScore 86
  2. Rank 2AKOMPState Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETFScore 83
  3. Rank 3ATRFMAAM Transformers ETFScore 74
  4. Rank 4AXITKState Street SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETFScore 73

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

TRFMAAAM Transformers ETF

XTAiShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF

In short

TRFM Most disruption funds buy the story. TRFM screens for companies actually writing R&D checks, then spreads the theme across a couple hundred US-listed names instead of a concentrated bet on thirty.

XT Innovation, spread thin on purpose. XT holds roughly 200 global companies scored by Morningstar analysts for exposure to a handful of exponential tech themes, so no single moonshot carries the fund.

Stated mandate

TRFM The Fund passively tracks the total return of the Pence Transformers Index before fees and expenses. The index targets U.S.-listed equity securities of companies positioned to benefit from significant changes in consumer behavior and technological innovation.

XT XT seeks to track an index of stocks from developed and emerging markets whose companies create or use exponential technologies. The strategy targets technologies with potential economic benefits, including the ability to displace older technologies or create new markets.

Why people hold it

  • TRFM Candidates are screened on research-and-development spending, so names earn a slot with budget receipts, not just a narrative.nasdaq.com
  • 0.49% a year, below the typical fee in its disruptive-innovation cohort, and it follows a published index rather than a manager's hunches.
  • Modified equal weighting across a couple hundred holdings keeps any single mega-cap from quietly becoming the whole theme.stockanalysis.com
  • Sits among the strongest implementations in its disruptive-innovation peer group on our review.
  • XT Cheap for the theme at 0.46% a year, below the typical fee in its disruptive-innovation cohort and under peers like TRFM and FDTX.
  • Human fingerprint on the stock list: Morningstar equity analysts score companies on theme exposure instead of sorting by keywords or revenue tags.sec.govcontentstack.io
  • Global by construction (developed and emerging markets) and not fenced into the tech sector, so a drugmaker or an industrial can qualify on theme exposure.sec.gov
  • Launched in 2015 and now a multi-billion-dollar iShares fund, it stands among the stronger builds in its innovation peer group.ishares.com

Worth knowing

  • TRFM Not the cheapest door into the theme. Broader innovation rivals such as KOMP carry a lower expense ratio.
  • Trades thinly next to the category's giants, so the bid-ask spread can matter more to your cost than the fee does.
  • Launched in 2022, so the track record is short, and the index stays US-listed (ADRs count) rather than buying foreign shares directly.stockanalysis.com
  • XT The index has been reworked since launch (weighting scheme, theme list), and themes get an annual review, so today's tilt is not fixed forever.morningstar.comsec.gov
  • Moderately traded rather than a household name, which can mean wider spreads than the biggest tech ETFs.
  • About 200 positions dilutes any single breakout winner, and distributions land only once or twice a year.

Full TRFM profile⁠

Full XT profile⁠

TRFM vs XT Holdings

How TRFM and XT differ

Overlap by weight

18.6%

Shared holdings make up 46.1% of XT and 26.6% of TRFM.

Level by level

  • Holdings42 in both18.6%
  • Sector11 Sectors67.3%
  • Countryby domicile88.9%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

Sector weights in TRFM and XT, widest gap first
SectorMore in TRFMMore in XT
Health CareXT +27.4 points
TechnologyTRFM +13.3 points
IndustrialsTRFM +13.1 points
UtilitiesTRFM +4.8 points
FinancialsXT +2.6 points
Consumer DiscretionaryXT +1.7 points
CommunicationTRFM +1.1 points
MaterialsXT +1.0 points
Consumer StaplesTRFM +0.3 points
EnergyTRFM +0.2 points
Real EstateSame weight

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in TRFM and XT, widest gap first
CountryMore in TRFMMore in XT
United KingdomXT +2.7 points
United StatesTRFM +2.4 points
SwitzerlandXT +2.4 points
SpainXT +1.5 points
CanadaTRFM +1.4 points
JapanTRFM +1.3 points
South KoreaXT +1.3 points
NetherlandsTRFM +1.2 points
Other countries (14)TRFM +1.6 points

Outside the US: XT 74% developed, 26% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • TRFM8.6%
  • XT36.5%

Securities held

  • TRFM266
  • XT193

Asset class

TRFM
Equity
XT
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in TRFM224
  • In both42
  • Only in XT151

Only in TRFM

224 securities, 73.4% of TRFM by weight

  • Datadog Inc0.88%
  • Visa Inc0.80%
  • Apple Inc0.79%

Only in XT

151 securities, 53.6% of XT by weight

  • Eli Lilly4.61%
  • Johnson & Johnson3.09%
  • AbbVie2.47%

Weight gaps

All 42 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in TRFM and XT, widest gap first
HoldingMore in TRFMMore in XT
Texas Instruments IncTXNXT +3.69 points
Tesla IncTSLAXT +3.60 points
Microsoft CorpMSFTXT +3.33 points
NVIDIA CorpNVDAXT +2.89 points
Palo Alto Networks IncPANWXT +2.62 points
Analog Devices IncADIXT +2.52 points
Crowdstrike Holdings IncCRWDXT +1.85 points
Amazon.com IncAMZNXT +1.82 points

All 270 TRFM holdings⁠All 193 XT holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

TRFM vs XT Cost

Overpaying TRFM vs XT

$562

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • TRFM 0.49%

    $9,792

  • XT 0.46%

    $9,230

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • TRFM 0.49%
  • XT 0.46%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530TRFM $9,792XT $9,230

Year by year

YearTRFMXTOverpaying
10$883$830$53
20$3,394$3,195$199
30$9,792$9,230$562

Expense ratio

  • 0.49%TRFM
  • 0.46%XT, cheaper
  • Middle half of Disruptive Innovation funds
  • Median 0.65%

XT 3rd cheapest of 30 funds

TRFM 4th cheapest of 30 funds

TRFM vs XT Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
TRFM No data
XT 6.82%
Payout (12M)
TRFM No data
XT $5.69
Last payment
TRFM $0.08
XT $0.36
Ex-dividend
TRFM Dec 31, 2025
XT Jun 15, 2026
Paid on
TRFM Jan 5, 2026
XT Jun 18, 2026
Frequency
TRFM Irregular
XT Twice a year

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

TRFMIrregular · 1 paymentAll TRFM payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 31, 2025 $0.08. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$52017202020232026YTD
XTTwice a year · 23 paymentsAll XT payments⁠
One bar per payment. 23 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Jun 20, 2017 $0.24; Dec 21, 2017 $0.10; Dec 28, 2017 $0.0072; Jun 19, 2018 $0.29; Dec 18, 2018 $0.18; Dec 28, 2018 $0.02; Jun 17, 2019 $0.36; Dec 16, 2019 $0.30; Jun 15, 2020 $0.24; Dec 14, 2020 $0.19; Dec 30, 2020 $0.01; Jun 10, 2021 $0.27; Dec 13, 2021 $0.28; Jun 9, 2022 $0.22; Dec 13, 2022 $0.15; Jun 7, 2023 $0.14; Dec 20, 2023 $0.11; Jun 11, 2024 $0.16; Dec 17, 2024 $0.22; Dec 30, 2024 $0.0094; Jun 16, 2025 $0.21; Dec 16, 2025 $5.33; Jun 15, 2026 $0.36. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$52017202020232026YTD

TRFM vs XT Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
TRFM 23.3%XT 16.5%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
TRFM 1.02XT 1.08, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
TRFM −28.4%since Jul 2022XT −34.4%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
TRFM 1.64XT 1.35

TRFM and XT in the news

Popular comparisons

  • TRFMAvsKOMPA

    AAM Transformers ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.20%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XTAvsKOMPA

    iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.46% · 0.20%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TRFMAvsXITKA

    AAM Transformers ETF · State Street SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XTAvsXITKA

    iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF · State Street SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.46% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TRFMAvsGINNA

    AAM Transformers ETF · Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XTAvsGINNA

    iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF · Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.46% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.