Skip to content

NUKX vs RCTR

Nicholas Nuclear Income ETF

NUKXDNYSE Arca

First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF

RCTRBNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

RCTR −0.37pt a year

NUKX1.07%RCTR0.70%

Avg volume · 30D

RCTR 1.4×the volume

NUKX3.7KRCTR5.27K

NUKX vs RCTR Performance

Aug 7, 2026 – Nov 9, 2026

−21.4%NUKX−11.1%RCTR

Aug 7, 2026 to Nov 9, 2026. NUKX −21.4%. RCTR −11.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−30%0%Aug 2026Sep 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
NUKX 1.07%
RCTR 0.70%, better
Fund size
NUKX $7M
RCTR $28M
1Y total return
NUKX No data
RCTR −10.1%
Holdings
NUKX 32
RCTR 49
Avg volume (30D)
NUKX 3.7K sh
RCTR 5.27K sh, better
NAV per share
NUKX $26.83
RCTR $29.04
52W range

ETF.net Grade

NUKX: Cost 6, Risk 62, Mission not scored, Tradability 22, Holdings 31, Durability 30. RCTR: Cost 62, Risk 71, Mission not scored, Tradability 48, Holdings 68, Durability 51.
Pillar letters and Scores for NUKX, RCTR, with each pillar’s weight
PillarNUKXRCTR
Cost30% weightF6B62Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightB62A71Higher
Tradability15% weightF22C48Higher
Holdings10% weightD31B68Higher
Durability5% weightD30C51Higher

Rank among Uranium & Nuclear funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. NUKX and RCTR are both graded against the same 9 Uranium & Nuclear funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Uranium & Nuclear⁠

Category · 9 funds
See all 9 ›

RCTR ranks 3rd and NUKX 9th of 9 funds in the Uranium & Nuclear Category.

  1. Rank 1ANLRVanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETFScore 74
  2. Rank 2BSMRFALPS Nautilus SMR, Nuclear & Technology ETFScore 64
  3. Rank 3BRCTRFirst Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETFScore 61
  4. Rank 4BURAGlobal X Uranium ETFScore 58
  5. Rank 8DURNJSprott Junior Uranium Miners ETFScore 33
  6. Rank 9DNUKXNicholas Nuclear Income ETFScore 25

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

NUKXDNicholas Nuclear Income ETF

RCTRBFirst Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF

In short

NUKX Uranium and nuclear stocks with a paycheck bolted on. NUKX puts capital appreciation first and current income second, a combination the pure-play miner funds skip. Launched in 2026, it is still a small, lightly traded newcomer.

RCTR No data

Stated mandate

NUKX The fund seeks capital appreciation as its primary objective and current income as its secondary objective.

RCTR No data

Why people hold it

  • NUKX Unusual wiring for the theme: current income is a stated secondary objective in the fund's own documents, not an afterthought to a price-only mandate.
  • Holds roughly 60 stocks, so the outcome rides on a basket of nuclear and uranium names rather than one reactor builder or one mine.
  • Plain 1940 Act ETF wrapper, no commodity trust or partnership quirks, with distributions paid on a recurring schedule instead of accruing quietly in the share price.

RCTR No data

Worth knowing

  • NUKX The 1.07% fee sits above the typical uranium and nuclear ETF and roughly double the group's cheapest option (NLR at 0.52%). Income has to clear that bar first.
  • Small asset base and light trading volume, which typically means wider spreads. Limit orders matter more here than in the category's household names.
  • Launched in 2026 with no published tracking index, so there is little history to judge and no rules-based benchmark to measure the manager against.

RCTR No data

Full NUKX profile⁠

Full RCTR profile⁠

NUKX vs RCTR Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

NUKX vs RCTR Cost

Overpaying NUKX vs RCTR

$6,209

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • NUKX 1.07%

    $19,815

  • RCTR 0.70%

    $13,606

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • NUKX 1.07%
  • RCTR 0.70%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530NUKX $19,815RCTR $13,606

Year by year

YearNUKXRCTROverpaying
10$1,881$1,250$631
20$7,046$4,760$2,286
30$19,815$13,606$6,209

Expense ratio

  • 1.07%NUKX
  • 0.70%RCTR, cheaper
  • Middle half of Uranium & Nuclear funds
  • Median 0.75%

RCTR 4th cheapest of 9 funds

NUKX 9th cheapest of 9 funds

NUKX vs RCTR Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Last payment
NUKX $0.07
RCTR $0.06
Ex-dividend
NUKX Nov 3, 2026
RCTR Sep 24, 2026
Paid on
NUKX Nov 4, 2026
RCTR Sep 30, 2026
Frequency
NUKX Weekly
RCTR Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2026, same scale for both

NUKXWeekly · 34 paymentsAll NUKX payments⁠
One bar per payment. 34 payments in 2026 YTD. Mar 17, 2026 $0.32; Mar 24, 2026 $0.31; Mar 31, 2026 $0.10; Apr 7, 2026 $0.10; Apr 14, 2026 $0.10; Apr 21, 2026 $0.11; Apr 28, 2026 $0.11; May 5, 2026 $0.11; May 12, 2026 $0.10; May 19, 2026 $0.11; May 27, 2026 $0.10; Jun 2, 2026 $0.10; Jun 9, 2026 $0.10; Jun 16, 2026 $0.09; Jun 23, 2026 $0.09; Jun 30, 2026 $0.09; Jul 7, 2026 $0.09; Jul 14, 2026 $0.09; Jul 21, 2026 $0.08; Jul 28, 2026 $0.08; Aug 4, 2026 $0.08; Aug 11, 2026 $0.08; Aug 18, 2026 $0.09; Aug 25, 2026 $0.08; Sep 1, 2026 $0.09; Sep 9, 2026 $0.09; Sep 15, 2026 $0.08; Sep 22, 2026 $0.08; Sep 29, 2026 $0.07; Oct 6, 2026 $0.07; Oct 14, 2026 $0.07; Oct 20, 2026 $0.07; Oct 27, 2026 $0.07; Nov 3, 2026 $0.07. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252026YTD
RCTRQuarterly · 3 paymentsAll RCTR payments⁠
One bar per payment. 3 payments in 2026 YTD. Mar 26, 2026 $0.03; Jun 25, 2026 $0.07; Sep 24, 2026 $0.06. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252026YTD

NUKX vs RCTR Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
NUKX No dataRCTR 24.8%since Aug 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
NUKX No dataRCTR −0.02since Aug 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
NUKX No dataRCTR −26.4%since Jul 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
NUKX 2.08RCTR 1.14

Popular comparisons

  • NUKXDvsNLRA

    Nicholas Nuclear Income ETF · VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.07% · 0.52%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RCTRBvsNLRA

    First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF · VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.70% · 0.52%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • NUKXDvsSMRFB

    Nicholas Nuclear Income ETF · ALPS Nautilus SMR, Nuclear & Technology ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.07% · 0.65%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RCTRBvsSMRFB

    First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF · ALPS Nautilus SMR, Nuclear & Technology ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.70% · 0.65%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • NUKXDvsURAB

    Nicholas Nuclear Income ETF · Global X Uranium ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.07% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RCTRBvsURAB

    First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF · Global X Uranium ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.70% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.