NLR ranks 1st and NUKX 9th of 9 funds in the Uranium & Nuclear Category.
NLR vs NUKX
NLR −0.55pt a year
0.52%1.07%
NLR 115.4×the volume
426K3.7K
NLR vs NUKX Performance
−19.7%−21.4%
- NLR 0.52%, better
- NUKX 1.07%
- NLR $2.94B
- NUKX $7M
- NLR −29.2%
- NUKX
- NLR 3.35%
- NUKX
- NLR 27
- NUKX 32
- NLR 426K sh, better
- NUKX 3.7K sh
- NLR $88.41
- NUKX $26.83
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | NLR | NUKX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A90Higher | F6 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C47 | B62Higher |
| Tradability | A82Higher | F22 |
| Holdings | C52Higher | D31 |
| Durability | A85Higher | D30 |
Rank among Uranium & Nuclear funds
Same Category. NLR and NUKX are both graded against the same 9 Uranium & Nuclear funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
NLRA
NUKXD
In short
NLR The original nuclear ETF, listed since 2007. NLR owns the whole chain (uranium miners, reactor builders, nuclear utilities, and the equipment firms serving them) at a lower fee than most of its rivals.
NUKX Uranium and nuclear stocks with a paycheck bolted on. NUKX puts capital appreciation first and current income second, a combination the pure-play miner funds skip. Launched in 2026, it is still a small, lightly traded newcomer.
Stated mandate
NLR The fund seeks to track the MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index before fees and expenses. The index covers companies involved in uranium mining, nuclear-facility and reactor construction, engineering and maintenance, nuclear electricity generation, and nuclear-industry equipment, technology, or services.
NUKX The fund seeks capital appreciation as its primary objective and current income as its secondary objective.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
NLR vs NUKX Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
NLR vs NUKX Cost
Overpaying NUKX vs NLR
$9,464
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
NLR 0.52%
$10,351
NUKX 1.07%
$19,815
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | NLR | NUKX | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $935 | $1,881 | $946 |
| 20 | $3,593 | $7,046 | $3,453 |
| 30 | $10,351 | $19,815 | $9,464 |
- 0.52%NLR, cheaper
- 1.07%NUKX
- Middle half of Uranium & Nuclear funds
- Median 0.75%
NLR cheapest of 9 funds
NUKX 9th cheapest of 9 funds
NLR vs NUKX Dividends
- NLR 3.35%
- NUKX
- NLR $3.17
- NUKX
- NLR $3.17
- NUKX $0.07
- NLR Dec 22, 2025
- NUKX Nov 3, 2026
- NLR Dec 26, 2025
- NUKX Nov 4, 2026
- NLR Annual
- NUKX Weekly
Distribution history
NLR vs NUKX Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- NLR 35.9%NUKX
- Return per unit of risk
- NLR 0.37NUKX
- Worst fall
- NLR −48.5%NUKX
- Market sensitivity
- NLR 1.07NUKX 2.08
NLR and NUKX in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.52% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.07% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.52% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.07% · 0.70%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.52% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.07% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.




