OILK ranks 1st and USO 4th of 11 funds in the Energy Futures Category.
OILK vs USO
0.0%by weight
OILK −0.16pt a year
0.70%0.86%
USO 50.8×the volume
113K5.73M
USO +1.1pt
+6.1%+7.2%
OILK vs USO Performance
+130.6%+195.4%
- OILK 0.70%, better
- USO 0.86%
- OILK $259M
- USO $1.95B
- OILK +89.1%
- USO +132.7%, better
- OILK 15.32%
- USO
- OILK 2
- USO 17
- OILK 113K sh
- USO 5.73M sh, better
- OILK $62.65
- USO $170.39
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | OILK | USO |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A93Higher | B65 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B69Higher | C43 |
| Tradability | B68 | A70Higher |
| Holdings | D28 | A100Higher |
| Durability | A72Higher | A71 |
Rank among Energy Futures funds
Same Category. OILK and USO are both graded against the same 11 Energy Futures funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
OILKA
USOB
In short
OILK The only crude oil ETF that spares you a Schedule K-1. OILK sends a 1099 instead, and its index spreads WTI futures across three roll schedules rather than camping in the front month. All-in cost: 0.70%.
USO The original US crude oil ETF, trading since 2006 and still one of the busiest ways to get WTI exposure without opening a futures account. It holds oil futures near the front of the curve, not barrels in a tank.
Stated mandate
OILK The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil IndexSM.
USO USO seeks daily NAV percentage changes that reflect changes in the spot price of light, sweet crude oil delivered to Cushing, Oklahoma, measured by the Benchmark Oil Futures Contract, plus collateral interest and less expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
OILK vs USO Holdings
How OILK and USO differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of OILK and 0.0% of USO.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for USO.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in OILKMore in USO | OILK | USO |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Concentration
- OILK100.0%
- USO91.4%
- OILK1
- USO14
Asset class
- OILK
- Commodities
- USO
- Commodities
Holdings
- Only in OILK1
- In both0
- Only in USO14
Only in OILK
1 security, 69.0% of OILK by weight
- Proshares Genius Mny Mkt Etf68.98%
Only in USO
14 securities, 41.1% of USO by weight
- Drey Inst Pref Gov Mm Inst 654612.45%
- Trs Macquarie MQCP361E 072120264.18%
- Trs Soc Gen Sgixcwti 061820263.83%
- Treasury Bill 0 12/31/20263.83%
- Treasury Bill 0 2/4/20273.81%
- Treasury Bill 0 11/17/20262.56%
- Treasury Bill 0 12/1/20261.79%
- Treasury Bill 0 11/3/20261.67%
- Treasury Bill 0 11/10/20261.67%
- Treasury Bill 0 12/24/20261.28%
- Treasury Bill 0 1/7/20271.27%
- Treasury Bill 0 1/21/20271.27%
- Treasury Bill 0 1/28/20271.27%
- Treasury Bill 0 12/8/20260.22%
Weight gaps
OILK and USO share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
OILK vs USO Cost
Overpaying USO vs OILK
$2,762
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
OILK 0.70%
$13,606
USO 0.86%
$16,368
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | OILK | USO | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,250 | $1,525 | $275 |
| 20 | $4,760 | $5,768 | $1,008 |
| 30 | $13,606 | $16,368 | $2,762 |
- 0.70%OILK, cheaper
- 0.86%USO
- Middle half of Energy Futures funds
- Median 1.01%
OILK cheapest of 11 funds
USO 4th cheapest of 11 funds
OILK vs USO Dividends
- OILK 15.32%
- USO
- OILK $9.54
- USO None
- OILK $2.57
- USO
- OILK Oct 1, 2026
- USO
- OILK Oct 7, 2026
- USO
- OILK Monthly
- USO
Distribution history
OILK vs USO Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- OILK
- USO
Risk facts
- Volatility
- OILK 26.3%, betterUSO 43.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- OILK 0.65USO 0.71, better
- Worst fall
- OILK −34.6%, betterUSO −36.2%
- Market sensitivity
- OILK 1.37USO 2.22
OILK and USO in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.70% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.86% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.81%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.86% · 0.81%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 1.01%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.86% · 1.01%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





