OILK ranks 1st and UNL 11th of 11 funds in the Energy Futures Category.
OILK vs UNL
OILK −0.95pt a year
0.70%1.65%
OILK 2.1×the volume
113K55K
OILK +12.8pt
+6.1%−6.7%
OILK vs UNL Performance
+130.6%−63.8%
- OILK 0.70%, better
- UNL 1.65%
- OILK $259M
- UNL $14M
- OILK +89.1%, better
- UNL −36.1%
- OILK 15.32%
- UNL
- OILK 2
- UNL 16
- OILK 113K sh, better
- UNL 55K sh
- OILK $62.65
- UNL $5.17
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | OILK | UNL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A93Higher | F12 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B69Higher | F23 |
| Tradability | B68Higher | D31 |
| Holdings | D28 | |
| Durability | A72Higher | C40 |
Rank among Energy Futures funds
Same Category. OILK and UNL are both graded against the same 11 Energy Futures funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
OILKA
UNLF
In short
OILK The only crude oil ETF that spares you a Schedule K-1. OILK sends a 1099 instead, and its index spreads WTI futures across three roll schedules rather than camping in the front month. All-in cost: 0.70%.
UNL Natural gas without the front-month tunnel vision. Since 2009, UNL has tracked an equally weighted ladder of 12 consecutive NYMEX gas futures, spreading the roll across a year instead of riding the next contract alone.
Stated mandate
OILK The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil IndexSM.
UNL UNL seeks to reflect changes in the spot price of natural gas delivered at Henry Hub, Louisiana, using an equally weighted average of 12 consecutive natural-gas futures contracts, plus collateral interest and less expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
OILK vs UNL Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
OILK vs UNL Cost
Overpaying UNL vs OILK
$14,760
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
OILK 0.70%
$13,606
UNL 1.65%
$28,366
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | OILK | UNL | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,250 | $2,831 | $1,581 |
| 20 | $4,760 | $10,338 | $5,578 |
| 30 | $13,606 | $28,366 | $14,760 |
- 0.70%OILK, cheaper
- 1.65%UNL
- Middle half of Energy Futures funds
- Median 1.01%
OILK cheapest of 11 funds
UNL 10th cheapest of 11 funds
OILK vs UNL Dividends
- OILK 15.32%
- UNL
- OILK $9.54
- UNL None
- OILK $2.57
- UNL
- OILK Oct 1, 2026
- UNL
- OILK Oct 7, 2026
- UNL
- OILK Monthly
- UNL
Distribution history
OILK vs UNL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- OILK
- UNL
Risk facts
- Volatility
- OILK 26.3%, betterUNL 28.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- OILK 0.65, betterUNL −0.95
- Worst fall
- OILK −34.6%, betterUNL −81.8%
- Market sensitivity
- OILK 1.37UNL 1.01
OILK and UNL in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.70% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.65% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.81%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.65% · 0.81%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.86%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.65% · 0.86%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

