DBO ranks 3rd and UNL 11th of 11 funds in the Energy Futures Category.
DBO vs UNL
DBO −0.84pt a year
0.81%1.65%
DBO 8.8×the volume
482K55K
DBO +20.8pt
+14.1%−6.7%
DBO vs UNL Performance
+104.2%−63.8%
- DBO 0.81%, better
- UNL 1.65%
- DBO $330M
- UNL $14M
- DBO +111.8%, better
- UNL −36.1%
- DBO 1.58%
- UNL
- DBO 4
- UNL 16
- DBO 482K sh, better
- UNL 55K sh
- DBO $27.27
- UNL $5.17
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DBO | UNL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A74Higher | F12 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C54Higher | F23 |
| Tradability | B66Higher | D31 |
| Holdings | B64 | |
| Durability | B69Higher | C40 |
Rank among Energy Futures funds
Same Category. DBO and UNL are both graded against the same 11 Energy Futures funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DBOB
UNLF
In short
DBO Oil exposure with a roll rule. DBO tracks a WTI crude futures index whose Optimum Yield design shops across contract months instead of camping in the front month, and it has run that way since 2007.
UNL Natural gas without the front-month tunnel vision. Since 2009, UNL has tracked an equally weighted ladder of 12 consecutive NYMEX gas futures, spreading the roll across a year instead of riding the next contract alone.
Stated mandate
DBO The fund seeks to track positive or negative changes in the level of the DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return.
UNL UNL seeks to reflect changes in the spot price of natural gas delivered at Henry Hub, Louisiana, using an equally weighted average of 12 consecutive natural-gas futures contracts, plus collateral interest and less expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DBO vs UNL Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DBO vs UNL Cost
Overpaying UNL vs DBO
$12,848
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DBO 0.81%
$15,518
UNL 1.65%
$28,366
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DBO | UNL | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,439 | $2,831 | $1,392 |
| 20 | $5,456 | $10,338 | $4,882 |
| 30 | $15,518 | $28,366 | $12,848 |
- 0.81%DBO, cheaper
- 1.65%UNL
- Middle half of Energy Futures funds
- Median 1.01%
DBO 3rd cheapest of 11 funds
UNL 10th cheapest of 11 funds
DBO vs UNL Dividends
- DBO 1.58%
- UNL
- DBO $0.43
- UNL None
- DBO $0.43
- UNL
- DBO Dec 22, 2025
- UNL
- DBO Dec 26, 2025
- UNL
- DBO Annual
- UNL
Distribution history
DBO vs UNL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- DBO
- UNL
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DBO 33.8%UNL 28.9%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- DBO 0.63, betterUNL −0.95
- Worst fall
- DBO −37.7%, betterUNL −81.8%
- Market sensitivity
- DBO 1.77UNL 1.01
DBO and UNL in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.81% · 0.70%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.65% · 0.70%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.81% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.65% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.81% · 0.86%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.65% · 0.86%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.




