TSLS ranks 3rd and ORCS 11th of 43 funds in the Single-Stock Inverse Category.
ORCS vs TSLS
TSLS −0.02pt a year
0.97%0.95%
TSLS 7.2×the volume
56.6K410K
ORCS vs TSLS Performance
+15.5%+1.5%
- ORCS 0.97%
- TSLS 0.95%, better
- ORCS $7M
- TSLS $39M
- ORCS
- TSLS +1.0%
- ORCS
- TSLS 3.11%
- ORCS 4
- TSLS 4
- ORCS 56.6K sh
- TSLS 410K sh, better
- ORCS $29.11
- TSLS $50.04
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ORCS | TSLS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A94 | A97Higher |
| Mission | A74 | A87Higher |
| Risk | A80Higher | A75 |
| Tradability | D33 | C45Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | C48 | A82Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Inverse funds
Same Category. ORCS and TSLS are both graded against the same 43 Single-Stock Inverse funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ORCSA
TSLSA
In short
ORCS The unleveraged short on Oracle. ORCS aims to deliver 100% of the inverse of ORCL's move each day, reset daily, so bearish exposure arrives as a regular ETF share instead of a margin ticket and a stock borrow.
TSLS The plain short on Tesla: TSLS aims for -1x the stock's daily move, with no leverage stacked on top. Among the small group of Tesla bear funds, it is the cheapest, and the one that dials risk down rather than up.
Stated mandate
ORCS The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 100% of the inverse of Oracle Corporation common shares. Its objective is reset daily and is designed for short-term use rather than tracking the stock over longer periods.
TSLS The Fund seeks daily inverse investment results by maintaining short exposure to TSLA of approximately -100% of its net assets and generally rebalancing that exposure each trading day.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ORCS vs TSLS Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ORCS vs TSLS Cost
Overpaying ORCS vs TSLS
$329
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ORCS 0.97%
$18,198
TSLS 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ORCS | TSLS | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,712 | $1,678 | $34 |
| 20 | $6,443 | $6,322 | $121 |
| 30 | $18,198 | $17,869 | $329 |
- 0.97%ORCS
- 0.95%TSLS, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Inverse funds
- Median 1.05%
TSLS 2nd cheapest of 43 funds
ORCS 4th cheapest of 43 funds
ORCS vs TSLS Dividends
- ORCS
- TSLS 3.11%
- ORCS
- TSLS $1.57
- ORCS $0.22
- TSLS $0.40
- ORCS Sep 22, 2026
- TSLS Sep 22, 2026
- ORCS Sep 29, 2026
- TSLS Sep 29, 2026
- ORCS Quarterly
- TSLS Quarterly
Distribution history
ORCS vs TSLS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ORCS TSLS 51.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- ORCS TSLS −0.76
- Worst fall
- ORCS TSLS −90.7%
- Market sensitivity
- ORCS −2.04TSLS −1.41
Popular comparisons
- 0.97% · 0.96%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.96%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.97% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.97% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.