PSMR ranks 3rd and PAPR 11th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 15% Category.
PAPR vs PSMR
0.0%by weight
PSMR −0.30pt a year
0.79%0.49%
PAPR 26.0×the volume
32.8K1.26K
PSMR +0.2pt
+8.2%+8.4%
PAPR vs PSMR Performance
+48.1%+49.5%
- PAPR 0.79%
- PSMR 0.49%, better
- PAPR $959M
- PSMR $91M
- PAPR +11.9%
- PSMR +11.9%
- PAPR 0.00%
- PSMR
- PAPR 3
- PSMR 3
- PAPR 32.8K sh, better
- PSMR 1.26K sh
- PAPR $43.21
- PSMR $33.00
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PAPR | PSMR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D35 | A70Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B63Higher | B57 |
| Tradability | B59Higher | D32 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A83Higher | B64 |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
Same Category. PAPR and PSMR are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PAPRC
PSMRB
In short
PAPR Innovator's April door. PAPR takes the first 15% of losses on the S&P 500 fund it references and caps your upside in exchange. The buffer resets every April 1, so the deal is rewritten once a year. Running since 2019.
PSMR A 15-point cushion on SPY, reset every April, for 0.49% a year while the typical buffer fund charges more. Pacer and Swan's moderate tier trades away some upside (a cap set each period) for a floor you know going in.
Stated mandate
PAPR The Fund uses a defined-outcome strategy tied to SPY over the April 1, 2026–March 31, 2027 Outcome Period, seeking to limit upside at a cap while protecting the first 15% of underlying losses before fees and expenses.
PSMR The Fund seeks to match the returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a predetermined cap while providing a downside buffer over an approximately one-year period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PAPR vs PSMR Holdings
How PAPR and PSMR differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of PAPR and 0.0% of PSMR.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
| Sector | More in PAPRMore in PSMR | PAPR | PSMR |
|---|---|---|---|
| Technology | Same weight | 40.1% | 40.1% |
| Financials | Same weight | 11.3% | 11.3% |
| Communication | Same weight | 9.9% | 9.9% |
| Health Care | Same weight | 9.4% | 9.4% |
| Consumer Discretionary | Same weight | 8.7% | 8.7% |
| Industrials | Same weight | 7.6% | 7.6% |
| Consumer Staples | Same weight | 4.4% | 4.4% |
| Energy | Same weight | 3.4% | 3.4% |
| Utilities | Same weight | 1.9% | 1.9% |
| Real Estate | Same weight | 1.7% | 1.7% |
| Materials | Same weight | 1.6% | 1.6% |
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in PAPRMore in PSMR | PAPR | PSMR |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 99.5% | 99.5% |
| Switzerland | Same weight | 0.3% | 0.3% |
| China | Same weight | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Mexico | Same weight | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Ireland | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| United Kingdom | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Concentration
- PAPR107.5%
- PSMR107.5%
- PAPR3
- PSMR2
Asset class
- PAPR
- Equity
- PSMR
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in PAPR3
- In both0
- Only in PSMR2
Only in PAPR
3 securities, 100% of PAPR by weight
- Spy 03/31/2027 6.5 C105.89%
- Spy 03/31/2027 650.34 P1.29%
- Us Bank Mmda - Usbgfs 9 09/01/20370.28%
Only in PSMR
2 securities, 100% of PSMR by weight
- Spy 03/31/2027 7.22 C106.08%
- Spy 03/31/2027 650.41 P1.18%
Weight gaps
PAPR and PSMR share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PAPR vs PSMR Cost
Overpaying PAPR vs PSMR
$5,382
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PAPR 0.79%
$15,174
PSMR 0.49%
$9,792
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PAPR | PSMR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,405 | $883 | $522 |
| 20 | $5,331 | $3,394 | $1,937 |
| 30 | $15,174 | $9,792 | $5,382 |
- 0.79%PAPR
- 0.49%PSMR, cheaper
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
- Median 0.79%
PSMR 5th cheapest of 51 funds
PAPR 24th cheapest of 51 funds
PAPR vs PSMR Dividends
- PAPR 0.00%
- PSMR
- PAPR None
- PSMR None
Distribution history
PAPR vs PSMR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- PAPR
- PSMR
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PAPR 5.9%, betterPSMR 6.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- PAPR 1.31PSMR 1.31Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Worst fall
- PAPR −11.9%PSMR −11.8%, better
- Market sensitivity
- PAPR 0.45PSMR 0.45Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
Popular comparisons
- 0.79% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.