BUFC ranks 4th and PAPR 11th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 15% Category.
BUFC vs PAPR
BUFC −0.10pt a year
0.69%0.79%
BUFC 1.5×the volume
49.5K32.8K
BUFC vs PAPR Performance
+5.7%+11.9%
- BUFC 0.69%, better
- PAPR 0.79%
- BUFC $1.1B
- PAPR $959M
- BUFC +5.7%
- PAPR +11.9%, better
- BUFC
- PAPR 0.00%
- BUFC 5
- PAPR 3
- BUFC 49.5K sh, better
- PAPR 32.8K sh
- BUFC $43.25
- PAPR $43.21
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BUFC | PAPR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B57Higher | D35 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C41 | B63Higher |
| Tradability | B62Higher | B59 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A74 | A83Higher |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
Same Category. BUFC and PAPR are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BUFCB
PAPRC
In short
BUFC Most buffer funds lock you into a 12-month outcome period. BUFC resets every three months, targeting 15% downside protection against the S&P 500 with roughly 3% of the upside per period. Deep cushion, short leash.
PAPR Innovator's April door. PAPR takes the first 15% of losses on the S&P 500 fund it references and caps your upside in exchange. The buffer resets every April 1, so the deal is rewritten once a year. Running since 2019.
Stated mandate
BUFC The Fund is an actively managed equity ETF seeking conservative capital appreciation with potential partial downside protection. It uses options to establish an upside cap and downside protection over rolling three-month periods, targeting 15% downside protection and about 3% upside participation to the S&P 500.
PAPR The Fund uses a defined-outcome strategy tied to SPY over the April 1, 2026–March 31, 2027 Outcome Period, seeking to limit upside at a cap while protecting the first 15% of underlying losses before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BUFC vs PAPR Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BUFC vs PAPR Cost
Overpaying PAPR vs BUFC
$1,745
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BUFC 0.69%
$13,429
PAPR 0.79%
$15,174
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BUFC | PAPR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,232 | $1,405 | $173 |
| 20 | $4,697 | $5,331 | $634 |
| 30 | $13,429 | $15,174 | $1,745 |
- 0.69%BUFC, cheaper
- 0.79%PAPR
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
- Median 0.79%
BUFC 17th cheapest of 51 funds
PAPR 24th cheapest of 51 funds
BUFC vs PAPR Dividends
- BUFC
- PAPR 0.00%
- BUFC None
- PAPR None
Distribution history
BUFC vs PAPR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BUFC 3.4%PAPR 5.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- BUFC 0.82PAPR 1.31
- Worst fall
- BUFC −8.3%PAPR −11.9%
- Market sensitivity
- BUFC 0.26PAPR 0.45
Popular comparisons
- 0.69% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.