PAWZ ranks 3rd and TSIC 7th of 10 funds in the Consumer Lifestyle Category.
PAWZ vs TSIC
PAWZ −0.15pt a year
0.50%0.65%
PAWZ 3.4×the volume
1.74K515
PAWZ vs TSIC Performance
−4.3%+3.0%
- PAWZ 0.50%, better
- TSIC 0.65%
- PAWZ $33M
- TSIC $2M
- PAWZ −3.0%
- TSIC
- PAWZ 0.70%
- TSIC
- PAWZ 28
- TSIC 52
- PAWZ 1.74K sh, better
- TSIC 515 sh
- PAWZ $52.22
- TSIC $25.28
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PAWZ | TSIC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A70Higher | D31 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C45 | B63Higher |
| Tradability | C52Higher | D37 |
| Holdings | F16 | B56Higher |
| Durability | B62Higher | C42 |
Rank among Consumer Lifestyle funds
Same Category. PAWZ and TSIC are both graded against the same 10 Consumer Lifestyle funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PAWZC
TSICC
In short
PAWZ One ticker for the pet economy: vet clinics, kibble makers, animal-health labs, the retailers that ship it all. PAWZ has tracked the FactSet Pet Care Index, globally, since 2018.
TSIC TSIC puts a media brand on a plain index fund: it tracks the Truth Social - Yorkville American Icons Index, a rules-based basket of US consumer-lifestyle stocks. The theme is the hook; the machinery underneath is standard indexing.
Stated mandate
PAWZ The fund invests globally in companies positioned at the forefront of the pet care industry.
TSIC The Fund seeks to provide investment results that generally correspond, before fees and expenses, to the performance of the Truth Social TM – Yorkville American Icons Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PAWZ vs TSIC Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PAWZ vs TSIC Cost
Overpaying TSIC vs PAWZ
$2,738
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PAWZ 0.50%
$9,979
TSIC 0.65%
$12,717
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PAWZ | TSIC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $1,163 | $263 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $4,440 | $980 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $12,717 | $2,738 |
- 0.50%PAWZ, cheaper
- 0.65%TSIC
- Middle half of Consumer Lifestyle funds
- Median 0.54%
PAWZ 3rd cheapest of 10 funds
TSIC 7th cheapest of 10 funds
PAWZ vs TSIC Dividends
- PAWZ 0.70%
- TSIC
- PAWZ $0.36
- TSIC
- PAWZ $0.06
- TSIC $0.02
- PAWZ Sep 23, 2026
- TSIC Oct 28, 2026
- PAWZ Sep 29, 2026
- TSIC Oct 29, 2026
- PAWZ Quarterly
- TSIC Monthly
Distribution history
PAWZ vs TSIC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PAWZ 21.3%TSIC
- Return per unit of risk
- PAWZ 0.24TSIC
- Worst fall
- PAWZ −50.1%TSIC
- Market sensitivity
- PAWZ 1.05TSIC 0.31
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.58%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.58%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.51%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.51%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.