Skip to content
etf.net

PBJN vs PSFO

PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - June

PBJNBCboe

Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF

PSFOBCboe

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

PSFO −0.01pt a year

PBJN0.50%PSFO0.49%

Avg volume · 30D

PSFO 1.2×the volume

PBJN5.93KPSFO7.12K

PBJN vs PSFO Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+6.0%PBJN+11.5%PSFO

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. PBJN +6.0%. PSFO +11.5%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−2.5%0%2.5%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
PBJN 0.50%
PSFO 0.49%, better
Fund size
PBJN $60M
PSFO $47M
1Y total return
PBJN +6.0%
PSFO +11.5%, better
Holdings
PBJN 4
PSFO 4
Avg volume (30D)
PBJN 5.93K sh
PSFO 7.12K sh, better
NAV per share
PBJN $31.57
PSFO $35.95
52W range

ETF.net Grade

PBJN: Cost 85, Risk 38, Mission not scored, Tradability 24, Holdings not scored, Durability 38. PSFO: Cost 85, Risk 29, Mission 95, Tradability 44, Holdings not scored, Durability 59.
Pillar letters and Scores for PBJN, PSFO, with each pillar’s weight
PillarPBJNPSFO
Cost30% weightA85A85
Mission25% weightNot scoredA95
Risk15% weightD38HigherD29
Tradability15% weightF24C44Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightD38B59Higher

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. PBJN and PSFO are both graded against the same 24 S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 20%⁠

Category · 24 funds
See all 24 ›

PSFO ranks 4th and PBJN 7th of 24 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 20% Category.

  1. Rank 1BBALTInnovator Defined Wealth Shield ETFScore 66
  2. Rank 2BPSFDPacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETFScore 61
  3. Rank 2BPSFJPacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETFScore 61
  4. Rank 4BPSFOPacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETFScore 60
  5. Rank 5BPSFMPacer Swan SOS Flex (April) ETFScore 58
  6. Rank 6BPBJAPGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - JanuaryScore 57
  7. Rank 7BPBJNPGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - JuneScore 56
  8. Rank 8COCTWAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETFScore 54

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

PBJNBPGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - June

PSFOBPacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF

In short

PBJN No data

PSFO Pacer's October-dated buffer fund absorbs the first 20% of an S&P 500 drop over each 12-month period, in exchange for a ceiling on the upside. At 0.49%, it charges less than the typical fund in its buffer peer group.

Stated mandate

PBJN No data

PSFO The fund seeks to match the pre-fee and pre-expense returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust.

Why people hold it

PBJN No data

  • PSFO 0.49% a year, below the median fee in its S&P 500 buffer cohort and well under peers like PMAY (0.79%) and BUFZ (0.95%).
  • Built to absorb the first 20% of a decline in the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) over each outcome period before the fund itself starts taking losses.
  • A 1940 Act ETF holding its own option package, not a bank-issued note, so no third-party credit sits between you and the payoff. Running since 2021.
  • Rates in the upper tier of a two-dozen-fund group of S&P 500 buffer strategies, largely on price.

Worth knowing

PBJN No data

  • PSFO The price of the cushion: gains stop at a cap fixed at the start of each period, and the fund hasn't been an income payer.
  • Buffer and cap are engineered for the full October 1 to September 30 stretch. Buy mid-period and your real cushion and ceiling differ from the headline terms.
  • Small asset base and light trading, which usually means wider spreads and more attention needed on how orders get entered.

Full PBJN profile⁠

Full PSFO profile⁠

PBJN vs PSFO Holdings

As of

How PBJN and PSFO differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of PBJN and 0.0% of PSFO.

Level by level

  • Asset classAlternatives, Equity0.0%
  • Holdings0 in both0.0%

Sector

No Sector split for PBJN.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

No country split for PBJN.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • PBJN102.2%
  • PSFO104.6%

Securities held

  • PBJN3
  • PSFO3

Asset class

PBJN
Alternatives
PSFO
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in PBJN3
  • In both0
  • Only in PSFO3

Only in PBJN

3 securities, 100% of PBJN by weight

  • 4SPY Us 05/28/27 C7.5698.14%
  • 4SPY Us 05/28/27 P756.483.29%
  • Net Current Assets<0.01%

Only in PSFO

3 securities, 100% of PSFO by weight

  • Spy 09/30/2027 8.54 C98.93%
  • Spy 09/30/2027 762.63 P4.57%
  • Spy 09/30/2027 457.58 P0.44%

Weight gaps

PBJN and PSFO share no securities.

All PBJN holdings⁠All 7 PSFO holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

PBJN vs PSFO Cost

Overpaying PBJN vs PSFO

$187

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • PBJN 0.50%

    $9,979

  • PSFO 0.49%

    $9,792

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • PBJN 0.50%
  • PSFO 0.49%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530PBJN $9,979PSFO $9,792

Year by year

YearPBJNPSFOOverpaying
10$900$883$17
20$3,460$3,394$66
30$9,979$9,792$187

Expense ratio

  • 0.50%PBJN
  • 0.49%PSFO, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds
  • Median 0.74%

PSFO cheapest of 24 funds

PBJN 5th cheapest of 24 funds

PBJN vs PSFO Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
PBJN None
PSFO None

Distribution history

PBJNAll PBJN payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PSFOAll PSFO payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PBJN vs PSFO Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
PBJN 4.8%since Jul 2024PSFO 6.8%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
PBJN 1.00since Jul 2024PSFO 1.38
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
PBJN −8.7%since Jun 2024PSFO −12.1%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
PBJN 0.34PSFO 0.50

Popular comparisons

  • PBJNBvsBALTB

    PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - June · Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • PSFOBvsBALTB

    Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF · Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • PBJNBvsPSFDB

    PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - June · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • PSFOBvsPSFDB

    Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • PBJNBvsPSFJB

    PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - June · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • PSFOBvsPSFJB

    Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.