Skip to content

PSFD vs PSFO

Pacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF

PSFDBCboe

Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF

PSFOBCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.

PSFD0.49%PSFO0.49%

Avg volume · 30D

PSFO 7.9×the volume

PSFD905PSFO7.12K

5Y return · a year

PSFD +0.4pt

PSFD+11.3%PSFO+10.9%

PSFD vs PSFO Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+70.8%PSFD+68.1%PSFO

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. PSFD +70.8%. PSFO +68.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%20%40%Oct 2021May 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
PSFD 0.49%
PSFO 0.49%
Fund size
PSFD $60M
PSFO $47M
1Y total return
PSFD +11.4%
PSFO +11.5%, better
Holdings
PSFD 4
PSFO 4
Avg volume (30D)
PSFD 905 sh
PSFO 7.12K sh, better
NAV per share
PSFD $40.88
PSFO $35.95
52W range

ETF.net Grade

PSFD: Cost 85, Risk 30, Mission not scored, Tradability 45, Holdings not scored, Durability 69. PSFO: Cost 85, Risk 29, Mission 95, Tradability 44, Holdings not scored, Durability 59.
Pillar letters and Scores for PSFD, PSFO, with each pillar’s weight
PillarPSFDPSFO
Cost30% weightA85A85
Mission25% weightNot scoredA95
Risk15% weightD30HigherD29
Tradability15% weightC45HigherC44
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightB69HigherB59

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. PSFD and PSFO are both graded against the same 24 S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 20%⁠

Category · 24 funds
See all 24 ›

PSFD ranks 2nd and PSFO 4th of 24 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 20% Category.

  1. Rank 1BBALTInnovator Defined Wealth Shield ETFScore 66
  2. Rank 2BPSFDPacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETFScore 61
  3. Rank 2BPSFJPacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETFScore 61
  4. Rank 4BPSFOPacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETFScore 60
  5. Rank 5BPSFMPacer Swan SOS Flex (April) ETFScore 58

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

PSFDBPacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF

PSFOBPacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF

In short

PSFD Absorbs the first 20% of a drop in the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust over each 12-month period, with your upside capped in exchange. One of the original 2020 Pacer/Swan buffer funds, and priced under most deep-buffer rivals.

PSFO Pacer's October-dated buffer fund absorbs the first 20% of an S&P 500 drop over each 12-month period, in exchange for a ceiling on the upside. At 0.49%, it charges less than the typical fund in its buffer peer group.

Stated mandate

PSFD The fund seeks to match the returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a stated cap while mitigating specified downside losses through a structured buffer strategy over an approximately one-year period.

PSFO The fund seeks to match the pre-fee and pre-expense returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust.

Why people hold it

  • PSFD 0.49% a year versus a 0.74% median for 20%-buffer S&P 500 funds, undercutting the AllianzIM month-series lineup (JANW, APRW, JUNW). When upside is capped, fees come straight out of the ceiling.
  • Deep cushion, clean reset: FLEX options are structured to absorb the first 20% of underlying losses over the roughly one-year period, with a new cap struck at the start of each period.paceretfs.com
  • Siblings run the same recipe on other calendars (PSFM in April, PSFJ in July), so start dates can be staggered instead of pinned to one January strike. Standing sits in the upper half of the deep-buffer group.
  • PSFO 0.49% a year, below the median fee in its S&P 500 buffer cohort and well under peers like PMAY (0.79%) and BUFZ (0.95%).
  • Built to absorb the first 20% of a decline in the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) over each outcome period before the fund itself starts taking losses.
  • A 1940 Act ETF holding its own option package, not a bank-issued note, so no third-party credit sits between you and the payoff. Running since 2021.
  • Rates in the upper tier of a two-dozen-fund group of S&P 500 buffer strategies, largely on price.

Worth knowing

  • PSFD Thinly traded. Spreads can be wider and larger orders harder to fill than in the giants of the buffer aisle.
  • No income stream: the fund holds options on an S&P 500 tracker rather than the stocks, and it has not paid a distribution.paceretfs.com
  • Buffer and cap run start to finish of the period and are set before fees and expenses. Shares bought mid-period carry different remaining cushion and headroom.paceretfs.com
  • PSFO The price of the cushion: gains stop at a cap fixed at the start of each period, and the fund hasn't been an income payer.
  • Buffer and cap are engineered for the full October 1 to September 30 stretch. Buy mid-period and your real cushion and ceiling differ from the headline terms.
  • Small asset base and light trading, which usually means wider spreads and more attention needed on how orders get entered.

Full PSFD profile⁠

Full PSFO profile⁠

PSFD vs PSFO Holdings

As of
How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

PSFD vs PSFO Cost

Same expense ratio

$9,792

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • PSFD 0.49%

    $9,792

  • PSFO 0.49%

    $9,792

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • PSFD 0.49%
  • PSFO 0.49%
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530PSFD $9,792PSFO $9,792

Year by year

YearPSFDPSFO
10$883$883
20$3,394$3,394
30$9,792$9,792

Expense ratio

  • 0.49%PSFD
  • 0.49%PSFO
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds
  • Median 0.74%

PSFD cheapest of 24 funds

PSFO cheapest of 24 funds

PSFD vs PSFO Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
PSFD None
PSFO None

Distribution history

PSFDAll PSFD payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PSFOAll PSFO payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PSFD vs PSFO Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • PSFD
  • PSFO
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: PSFD −14.9% · Jun 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−8%−6%−4%−2%0%Oct 2021May 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
PSFD 7.4%PSFO 6.8%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
PSFD 1.50, betterPSFO 1.38
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
PSFD −14.9%PSFO −12.1%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
PSFD 0.56PSFO 0.50

Popular comparisons

  • PSFDBvsBALTB

    Pacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF · Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSFOBvsBALTB

    Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF · Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSFDBvsPSFJB

    Pacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSFOBvsPSFJB

    Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSFDBvsPSFMB

    Pacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (April) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSFOBvsPSFMB

    Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (April) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.