XLY ranks 1st and PEZ 14th of 14 funds in the Consumer Discretionary (Broad) Category.
PEZ vs XLY
XLY −0.52pt a year
0.60%0.08%
XLY 11173.6×the volume
6587.35M
XLY +3.0pt
+10.0%+13.0%
PEZ vs XLY Performance
+4.2%+23.4%
- PEZ 0.60%
- XLY 0.08%, better
- PEZ $22M
- XLY $22.7B
- PEZ +6.8%, better
- XLY +3.4%
- PEZ 0.38%
- XLY 0.77%, better
- PEZ 34
- XLY 50
- PEZ 658 sh
- XLY 7.35M sh, better
- PEZ $99.45
- XLY $117.59
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PEZ | XLY |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F4 | A96Higher |
| Mission | A81 | |
| Risk | D31 | B55Higher |
| Tradability | D36 | A100Higher |
| Holdings | B64Higher | C40 |
| Durability | D29 | A79Higher |
Rank among Consumer Discretionary (Broad) funds
Same Category. PEZ and XLY are both graded against the same 14 Consumer Discretionary (Broad) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PEZD
XLYA
In short
PEZ Most consumer discretionary funds own the sector by size. PEZ owns the trend: roughly 30 cyclical stocks picked and weighted by price momentum, reshuffled every quarter. Fee is 0.60% net of a waiver through August 31, 2028.
XLY Live since 1998 as one of the original Select Sector SPDRs, XLY bundles the S&P 500's spending-money stocks (cars, couches, burgers, online carts) into one heavily traded ticker at eight basis points.
Stated mandate
PEZ The fund tracks an index designed to identify companies exhibiting relative strength, or momentum, within the consumer cyclicals segment.
XLY The fund seeks to track the performance of the Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index, providing targeted exposure to companies in the consumer discretionary sector.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PEZ vs XLY Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PEZ vs XLY Cost
Overpaying PEZ vs XLY
$10,128
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PEZ 0.60%
$11,817
XLY 0.08%
$1,689
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PEZ | XLY | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,076 | $147 | $929 |
| 20 | $4,116 | $575 | $3,541 |
| 30 | $11,817 | $1,689 | $10,128 |
- 0.60%PEZ
- 0.08%XLY, cheaper
- Middle half of Consumer Discretionary (Broad) funds
- Median 0.35%
XLY cheapest of 14 funds
PEZ 13th cheapest of 14 funds
PEZ vs XLY Dividends
- PEZ 0.38%
- XLY 0.77%, better
- PEZ $0.38
- XLY $0.93
- PEZ $0.13
- XLY $0.24
- PEZ Sep 21, 2026
- XLY Sep 21, 2026
- PEZ Sep 25, 2026
- XLY Sep 23, 2026
- PEZ Quarterly
- XLY Quarterly
Distribution history
PEZ vs XLY Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- PEZ
- XLY
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PEZ 23.3%XLY 17.7%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- PEZ 0.65XLY 0.67, better
- Worst fall
- PEZ −41.7%XLY −39.7%, better
- Market sensitivity
- PEZ 1.49XLY 1.21
PEZ and XLY in the news



Closing Bell
Stocks higher on narrow tech and consumer rally



Popular comparisons
- 0.60% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.