XRT ranks 3rd and PEZ 14th of 14 funds in the Consumer Discretionary (Broad) Category.
PEZ vs XRT
XRT −0.25pt a year
0.60%0.35%
XRT 5953.1×the volume
6583.92M
PEZ +0.3pt
+10.0%+9.7%
PEZ vs XRT Performance
+4.2%−2.1%
- PEZ 0.60%
- XRT 0.35%, better
- PEZ $22M
- XRT $591M
- PEZ +6.8%
- XRT +17.2%, better
- PEZ 0.38%
- XRT 0.80%, better
- PEZ 34
- XRT 75
- PEZ 658 sh
- XRT 3.92M sh, better
- PEZ $99.45
- XRT $89.50
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PEZ | XRT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F4 | C50Higher |
| Mission | A85 | |
| Risk | D31 | B68Higher |
| Tradability | D36 | A87Higher |
| Holdings | B64 | A86Higher |
| Durability | D29 | B59Higher |
Rank among Consumer Discretionary (Broad) funds
Same Category. PEZ and XRT are both graded against the same 14 Consumer Discretionary (Broad) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PEZD
XRTB
In short
PEZ Most consumer discretionary funds own the sector by size. PEZ owns the trend: roughly 30 cyclical stocks picked and weighted by price momentum, reshuffled every quarter. Fee is 0.60% net of a waiver through August 31, 2028.
XRT Pure retail, not broad consumer discretionary. XRT equal-weights roughly 80 store chains and online sellers, so a small-cap mall retailer carries about as much freight as a mega-cap giant. It has been the sector's trading vehicle since 2006.
Stated mandate
PEZ The fund tracks an index designed to identify companies exhibiting relative strength, or momentum, within the consumer cyclicals segment.
XRT The fund seeks to provide investment results that generally correspond to the total return performance of the S&P Retail Select Industry Index, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PEZ vs XRT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PEZ vs XRT Cost
Overpaying PEZ vs XRT
$4,691
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PEZ 0.60%
$11,817
XRT 0.35%
$7,126
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PEZ | XRT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,076 | $634 | $442 |
| 20 | $4,116 | $2,454 | $1,662 |
| 30 | $11,817 | $7,126 | $4,691 |
- 0.60%PEZ
- 0.35%XRT, cheaper
- Middle half of Consumer Discretionary (Broad) funds
- Median 0.35%
XRT 6th cheapest of 14 funds
PEZ 13th cheapest of 14 funds
PEZ vs XRT Dividends
- PEZ 0.38%
- XRT 0.80%, better
- PEZ $0.38
- XRT $0.74
- PEZ $0.13
- XRT $0.17
- PEZ Sep 21, 2026
- XRT Sep 21, 2026
- PEZ Sep 25, 2026
- XRT Sep 23, 2026
- PEZ Quarterly
- XRT Quarterly
Distribution history
PEZ vs XRT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- PEZ
- XRT
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PEZ 23.3%XRT 20.6%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- PEZ 0.65, betterXRT 0.61
- Worst fall
- PEZ −41.7%, betterXRT −44.6%
- Market sensitivity
- PEZ 1.49XRT 1.17
PEZ and XRT in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.60% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.




