Skip to content

PEZ vs XRT

Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF

PEZDNasdaq

State Street SPDR S&P Retail ETF

XRTBNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

XRT −0.25pt a year

PEZ0.60%XRT0.35%

Avg volume · 30D

XRT 5953.1×the volume

PEZ658XRT3.92M

10Y return · a year

PEZ +0.3pt

PEZ+10.0%XRT+9.7%

PEZ vs XRT Performance

Nov 9, 2021 – Nov 9, 2026

+4.2%PEZ−2.1%XRT

Nov 9, 2021 to Nov 9, 2026. PEZ +4.2%. XRT −2.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−40%−30%−20%−10%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026
Expense ratio
PEZ 0.60%
XRT 0.35%, better
Fund size
PEZ $22M
XRT $591M
1Y total return
PEZ +6.8%
XRT +17.2%, better
Yield (12M)
PEZ 0.38%
XRT 0.80%, better
Holdings
PEZ 34
XRT 75
Avg volume (30D)
PEZ 658 sh
XRT 3.92M sh, better
NAV per share
PEZ $99.45
XRT $89.50
52W range

ETF.net Grade

PEZ: Cost 4, Risk 31, Mission not scored, Tradability 36, Holdings 64, Durability 29. XRT: Cost 50, Risk 68, Mission 85, Tradability 87, Holdings 86, Durability 59.
Pillar letters and Scores for PEZ, XRT, with each pillar’s weight
PillarPEZXRT
Cost30% weightF4C50Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA85
Risk15% weightD31B68Higher
Tradability15% weightD36A87Higher
Holdings10% weightB64A86Higher
Durability5% weightD29B59Higher

Rank among Consumer Discretionary (Broad) funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. PEZ and XRT are both graded against the same 14 Consumer Discretionary (Broad) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

See all 14 ›

XRT ranks 3rd and PEZ 14th of 14 funds in the Consumer Discretionary (Broad) Category.

  1. Rank 1AXLYState Street Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR ETFScore 80
  2. Rank 2BFDISFidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETFScore 70
  3. Rank 3BXRTState Street SPDR S&P Retail ETFScore 66
  4. Rank 4BVCRVanguard Consumer Discretionary ETFScore 63
  5. Rank 13DFXDFirst Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX FundScore 33
  6. Rank 14DPEZInvesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETFScore 25

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

PEZDInvesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF

XRTBState Street SPDR S&P Retail ETF

In short

PEZ Most consumer discretionary funds own the sector by size. PEZ owns the trend: roughly 30 cyclical stocks picked and weighted by price momentum, reshuffled every quarter. Fee is 0.60% net of a waiver through August 31, 2028.

XRT Pure retail, not broad consumer discretionary. XRT equal-weights roughly 80 store chains and online sellers, so a small-cap mall retailer carries about as much freight as a mega-cap giant. It has been the sector's trading vehicle since 2006.

Stated mandate

PEZ The fund tracks an index designed to identify companies exhibiting relative strength, or momentum, within the consumer cyclicals segment.

XRT The fund seeks to provide investment results that generally correspond to the total return performance of the S&P Retail Select Industry Index, before fees and expenses.

Why people hold it

  • PEZ The index ranks consumer cyclicals by relative strength, holds at least 30 of them, and reconstitutes every January, April, July and October, so fading names get cut on a schedule.nasdaqomx.com
  • Weights come from each stock's momentum score, not its market cap, so the portfolio can reach well past the sector's handful of giants.nasdaqomx.com
  • Listed since October 2006, it has run the same Dorsey Wright momentum rules on US consumer cyclicals through multiple consumer cycles. Not a recent launch chasing a theme.
  • XRT Modified equal weight: the index resets constituents toward equal slices each quarter, so a single giant retailer does not run the whole fund.spglobal.com
  • Retail only: apparel, automotive, broadline, computer and electronics, staples merchandise, drug, food and specialty stores. Car dealers count, carmakers do not.ssga.com
  • Trading since 2006 and very actively traded, one of the older and busier ways to take a targeted position on US retail rather than a whole sector.ssga.com
  • Sticks tightly to its index and stands among the stronger builds in its consumer discretionary peer group. Pays quarterly.

Worth knowing

  • PEZ Cost sits above the category median: 0.60% net of a waiver through August 31, 2028, against a 0.97% gross ratio, versus 0.08% for XLY and 0.09% for VCR.
  • One of the smaller and thinner-traded funds in its category, so the bid-ask spread is a real part of the cost of getting in and out.
  • A full quarterly rebuild means heavy turnover and a roster that can look unrecognizable year to year; momentum rules can get whipsawed when sector leadership flips.nasdaqomx.com
  • XRT At 0.35% it costs more than broad cap-weighted discretionary funds like XLY and FDIS near 0.08%. The focus and the equal weighting are what the extra buys.
  • Equal weighting pulls small and mid-cap chains up next to the giants, so moves can be sharper than a cap-weighted sector fund's.ssga.com
  • One industry, roughly 80 names. When shoppers tighten up, there is no other sector inside the fund to cushion it.

Full PEZ profile⁠

Full XRT profile⁠

PEZ vs XRT Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

PEZ vs XRT Cost

Overpaying PEZ vs XRT

$4,691

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • PEZ 0.60%

    $11,817

  • XRT 0.35%

    $7,126

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • PEZ 0.60%
  • XRT 0.35%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530PEZ $11,817XRT $7,126

Year by year

YearPEZXRTOverpaying
10$1,076$634$442
20$4,116$2,454$1,662
30$11,817$7,126$4,691

Expense ratio

  • 0.60%PEZ
  • 0.35%XRT, cheaper
  • Middle half of Consumer Discretionary (Broad) funds
  • Median 0.35%

XRT 6th cheapest of 14 funds

PEZ 13th cheapest of 14 funds

PEZ vs XRT Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Yield (12M)
PEZ 0.38%
XRT 0.80%, better
Payout (12M)
PEZ $0.38
XRT $0.74
Last payment
PEZ $0.13
XRT $0.17
Ex-dividend
PEZ Sep 21, 2026
XRT Sep 21, 2026
Paid on
PEZ Sep 25, 2026
XRT Sep 23, 2026
Frequency
PEZ Quarterly
XRT Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

PEZQuarterly · 30 paymentsAll PEZ payments⁠
One bar per payment. 30 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Jun 16, 2017 $0.03; Sep 18, 2017 $0.14; Dec 18, 2017 $0.05; Mar 19, 2018 $0.02; Jun 18, 2018 $0.08; Sep 24, 2018 $0.04; Dec 24, 2018 $0.05; Sep 23, 2019 $0.002; Dec 23, 2019 $0.003; Mar 23, 2020 $0.10; Jun 22, 2020 $0.04; Sep 21, 2020 $0.07; Dec 21, 2020 $0.08; Mar 22, 2021 $0.01; Jun 21, 2021 $0.01; Sep 20, 2021 $0.08; Dec 20, 2021 $0.11; Mar 21, 2022 $0.01; Jun 21, 2022 $0.01; Sep 19, 2022 $0.14; Dec 19, 2022 $0.11; Mar 20, 2023 $0.23; Jun 20, 2023 $0.14; Sep 18, 2023 $0.09; Dec 18, 2023 $0.03; Mar 18, 2024 $0.12; Jun 23, 2025 $0.12; Mar 23, 2026 $0.10; Jun 22, 2026 $0.15; Sep 21, 2026 $0.13. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD
XRTQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll XRT payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 17, 2017 $0.11; Jun 16, 2017 $0.20; Sep 15, 2017 $0.18; Dec 15, 2017 $0.20; Mar 16, 2018 $0.13; Jun 15, 2018 $0.17; Sep 21, 2018 $0.16; Dec 21, 2018 $0.17; Mar 15, 2019 $0.14; Jun 21, 2019 $0.19; Sep 20, 2019 $0.18; Dec 20, 2019 $0.21; Mar 23, 2020 $0.17; Jun 22, 2020 $0.09; Sep 21, 2020 $0.13; Dec 21, 2020 $0.25; Mar 22, 2021 $0.16; Jun 21, 2021 $0.12; Sep 20, 2021 $0.19; Dec 20, 2021 $0.93; Mar 21, 2022 $0.09; Jun 21, 2022 $0.32; Sep 19, 2022 $0.34; Dec 19, 2022 $0.54; Mar 20, 2023 $0.21; Jun 20, 2023 $0.31; Sep 18, 2023 $0.17; Dec 18, 2023 $0.33; Mar 18, 2024 $0.15; Jun 24, 2024 $0.37; Sep 23, 2024 $0.12; Dec 23, 2024 $0.56; Mar 24, 2025 $0.18; Jun 23, 2025 $0.21; Sep 22, 2025 $0.10; Dec 22, 2025 $0.17; Mar 23, 2026 $0.21; Jun 22, 2026 $0.19; Sep 21, 2026 $0.17. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD

PEZ vs XRT Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • PEZ
  • XRT
Nov 9, 2021 to Nov 9, 2026. Worst fall: XRT −44.6% · Sep 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−40%−30%−20%−10%0%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
PEZ 23.3%XRT 20.6%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
PEZ 0.65, betterXRT 0.61
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
PEZ −41.7%, betterXRT −44.6%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
PEZ 1.49XRT 1.17

PEZ and XRT in the news

Popular comparisons

  • PEZDvsXLYA

    Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF · State Street Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XRTBvsXLYA

    State Street SPDR S&P Retail ETF · State Street Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PEZDvsFDISB

    Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF · Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XRTBvsFDISB

    State Street SPDR S&P Retail ETF · Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PEZDvsVCRB

    Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF · Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.09%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XRTBvsVCRB

    State Street SPDR S&P Retail ETF · Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.09%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.