Skip to content

PRTO vs RISN

RCN Pareto Strategic Allocation ETF

PRTOBNYSE Arca

Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

RISNANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

RISN −0.10pt a year

PRTO0.82%RISN0.72%

Avg volume · 30D

RISN 17.1×the volume

PRTO864RISN14.8K

PRTO vs RISN Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

−0.7%PRTO+0.6%RISN

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. PRTO −0.7%. RISN +0.6%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−2%2%4%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
PRTO 0.82%
RISN 0.72%, better
Fund size
PRTO $18M
RISN $70M
1Y total return
PRTO No data
RISN +4.8%
Yield (12M)
PRTO No data
RISN 1.05%
Holdings
PRTO 19
RISN 53
Avg volume (30D)
PRTO 864 sh
RISN 14.8K sh, better
NAV per share
PRTO $27.49
RISN $31.09
52W range

ETF.net Grade

PRTO: Cost 66, Risk 57, Mission 59, Tradability 40, Holdings 59, Durability 21. RISN: Cost 76, Risk 46, Mission 85, Tradability 64, Holdings 80, Durability 68.
Pillar letters and Scores for PRTO, RISN, with each pillar’s weight
PillarPRTORISN
Cost30% weightB66A76Higher
Mission25% weightB59A85Higher
Risk15% weightB57HigherC46
Tradability15% weightC40B64Higher
Holdings10% weightB59A80Higher
Durability5% weightF21B68Higher

Rank among Tactical Allocation funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. PRTO and RISN are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Tactical Allocation⁠

Category · 46 funds
See all 46 ›

RISN ranks 4th and PRTO 21st of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.

  1. Rank 1AENDWCambria Endowment Style ETFScore 81
  2. Rank 2AGMODGMO Dynamic Allocation ETFScore 76
  3. Rank 3APTBDPacer Trendpilot US Bond ETFScore 72
  4. Rank 4ARISNInspire Capital Appreciation ETFScore 71
  5. Rank 5BPBLPGIM Portfolio Ballast ETFScore 69
  6. Rank 21BGMMAGammaRoad Market Navigation ETFScore 55
  7. Rank 21BPRTORCN Pareto Strategic Allocation ETFScore 55
  8. Rank 21BUSAFAtlas America FundScore 55

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

PRTOBRCN Pareto Strategic Allocation ETF

RISNAInspire Capital Appreciation ETF

In short

PRTO A rules-driven wanderer: PRTO leans on trend and momentum signals to shift across asset classes instead of parking in a fixed 60/40. Launched in 2026 at 0.82% a year, it undercuts the typical tactical allocator while it builds a record.

RISN A tactical blend of U.S. large-cap stocks and U.S. bonds from a values-screening shop, built to chase long-term growth with less turbulence than the large-cap market, at a fee below the typical tactical peer.

Stated mandate

PRTO The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through dynamic allocation across multiple asset classes, using systematic trend-following and momentum-driven signals.

RISN The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation with lower volatility than the U.S. large-cap stock market.

Why people hold it

  • PRTO The mandate is explicit: dynamic allocation across multiple asset classes driven by systematic trend-following and momentum signals. Rules decide when it leans in or backs off, not a manager's mood.
  • 0.82% a year sits below the median fee in its tactical-allocation peer group, where all that shape-shifting usually costs more.
  • One ticker covers the allocation decision. Instead of you rebalancing sleeves, the signals dial exposures up and down across asset classes.
  • RISN Charges 0.72% a year, under the going rate for tactical multi-asset funds that actively shift their mix.
  • One ticket holds U.S. large-cap equities alongside U.S. fixed income, with the stated aim of long-term appreciation at lower volatility than U.S. large caps.
  • One of the stronger implementations in a crowded tactical multi-asset field, with a live record going back to its 2020 launch.
  • Pays out quarterly, so the bond sleeve shows up as scheduled cash rather than a once-a-year surprise.

Worth knowing

  • PRTO It launched in 2026, so the signals have no long track record across a full market cycle yet.
  • Small and thinly traded: spreads can run wider than the category's heavyweights, and size orders can move the price.
  • Below the peer median on fees, not at the floor. ENDW (0.22%) and ONOF (0.39%) run tactical allocation playbooks for less.
  • RISN Thinly traded and modest in size, so bid-ask spreads can matter more than the fee does. Limit orders are the standard workaround.
  • Tactical means judgment calls: the allocation can look nothing like a fixed stock/bond blend at any given moment.
  • Cheap for tactical, not cheap outright. Peers such as ENDW (0.22%) and ONOF (0.39%) run at a fraction of the fee.

Full PRTO profile⁠

Full RISN profile⁠

PRTO vs RISN Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

PRTO vs RISN Cost

Overpaying PRTO vs RISN

$1,732

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • PRTO 0.82%

    $15,689

  • RISN 0.72%

    $13,957

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • PRTO 0.82%
  • RISN 0.72%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530PRTO $15,689RISN $13,957

Year by year

YearPRTORISNOverpaying
10$1,457$1,284$173
20$5,519$4,888$631
30$15,689$13,957$1,732

Expense ratio

  • 0.82%PRTO
  • 0.72%RISN, cheaper
  • Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
  • Median 0.93%

RISN 12th cheapest of 46 funds

PRTO 16th cheapest of 46 funds

PRTO vs RISN Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
PRTO No data
RISN 1.05%
Payout (12M)
PRTO None
RISN $0.32
Last payment
PRTO No data
RISN $0.08
Ex-dividend
PRTO No data
RISN Sep 25, 2026
Paid on
PRTO No data
RISN Oct 1, 2026
Frequency
PRTO No data
RISN Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2020 to 2026, same scale for both

PRTOAll PRTO payments⁠

No distribution history available.

RISNQuarterly · 24 paymentsAll RISN payments⁠
One bar per payment. 24 payments from 2020 to 2026 YTD. Sep 25, 2020 $0.03; Dec 14, 2020 $1.16; Dec 30, 2020 $0.01; Mar 26, 2021 $0.03; Jun 25, 2021 $0.05; Sep 24, 2021 $0.05; Dec 14, 2021 $2.65; Sep 23, 2022 $0.06; Dec 14, 2022 $0.23; Mar 27, 2023 $0.13; Jun 23, 2023 $0.15; Sep 22, 2023 $0.11; Dec 14, 2023 $0.13; Mar 27, 2024 $0.08; Jun 25, 2024 $0.06; Sep 25, 2024 $0.10; Dec 16, 2024 $0.13; Mar 27, 2025 $0.04; Jun 26, 2025 $0.06; Sep 26, 2025 $0.12; Dec 17, 2025 $0.07; Mar 27, 2026 $0.07; Jun 26, 2026 $0.10; Sep 25, 2026 $0.08. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.50202020232026YTD

PRTO vs RISN Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
PRTO No dataRISN 11.4%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
PRTO No dataRISN 0.77
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
PRTO No dataRISN −21.9%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
PRTO 0.79RISN 1.08

Popular comparisons

  • PRTOBvsENDWA

    RCN Pareto Strategic Allocation ETF · Cambria Endowment Style ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.82% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RISNAvsENDWA

    Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF · Cambria Endowment Style ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.72% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PRTOBvsGMODA

    RCN Pareto Strategic Allocation ETF · GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.82% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RISNAvsGMODA

    Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF · GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.72% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PRTOBvsPTBDA

    RCN Pareto Strategic Allocation ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.82% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RISNAvsPTBDA

    Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.72% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.