PTBD ranks 3rd and XNAV 41st of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.
PTBD vs XNAV
PTBD −0.67pt a year
0.60%1.27%
PTBD 19.0×the volume
18.6K976
XNAV +14.0pt
+4.1%+18.1%
PTBD vs XNAV Performance
−0.2%+5.3%
- PTBD 0.60%, better
- XNAV 1.27%
- PTBD $83M
- XNAV $29M
- PTBD −0.2%
- XNAV +5.3%, better
- PTBD 6.36%, better
- XNAV 0.55%
- PTBD 1050
- XNAV 21
- PTBD 18.6K sh, better
- XNAV 976 sh
- PTBD $18.34
- XNAV $86.24
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PTBD | XNAV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A83Higher | F18 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B60Higher | F24 |
| Tradability | C50Higher | C44 |
| Holdings | A90Higher | A74 |
| Durability | A83Higher | B63 |
Rank among Tactical Allocation funds
Same Category. PTBD and XNAV are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PTBDA
XNAVD
In short
PTBD Trend following, pointed at bonds instead of stocks. A published rulebook shifts PTBD between high yield corporates and intermediate Treasuries as their relative strength changes, dialing credit risk up or down by formula rather than by opinion.
XNAV A fund of ETFs that rotates into what's leading: the advisor's "Upgrading" system, in print as a newsletter since 1976, pointed at the aggressive end (sector and country funds). The 1.27% fee is the price of the hand-steering.
Stated mandate
PTBD The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Pacer Trendpilot US Bond Index through a rules-based strategy that alternates between high-yield corporate bonds and U.S. Treasury bonds.
XNAV Seeks long-term capital appreciation without prioritizing income.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PTBD vs XNAV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PTBD vs XNAV Cost
Overpaying XNAV vs PTBD
$11,101
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PTBD 0.60%
$11,817
XNAV 1.27%
$22,918
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PTBD | XNAV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,076 | $2,214 | $1,138 |
| 20 | $4,116 | $8,220 | $4,104 |
| 30 | $11,817 | $22,918 | $11,101 |
- 0.60%PTBD, cheaper
- 1.27%XNAV
- Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
- Median 0.93%
PTBD 8th cheapest of 46 funds
XNAV 38th cheapest of 46 funds
PTBD vs XNAV Dividends
- PTBD 6.36%, better
- XNAV 0.55%
- PTBD $1.17
- XNAV $0.47
- PTBD $0.10
- XNAV $0.47
- PTBD Oct 22, 2026
- XNAV Dec 31, 2025
- PTBD Oct 26, 2026
- XNAV Jan 2, 2026
- PTBD Monthly
- XNAV Annual
Distribution history
PTBD vs XNAV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PTBD 5.2%, betterXNAV 17.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- PTBD 0.08XNAV 0.89, better
- Worst fall
- PTBD −24.8%XNAV −24.3%
- Market sensitivity
- PTBD 0.74XNAV 1.13
Popular comparisons
- 0.60% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.27% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.27% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.72%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.27% · 0.72%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.