SCMB ranks 2nd and PWZ 22nd of 63 funds in the Other Municipal Bond Category.
PWZ vs SCMB
SCMB −0.25pt a year
0.28%0.03%
SCMB 4.2×the volume
782K3.28M
PWZ +0.2pt
+4.3%+4.1%
PWZ vs SCMB Performance
−1.2%−0.6%
- PWZ 0.28%
- SCMB 0.03%, better
- PWZ $1.23B
- SCMB $4.07B
- PWZ −1.2%
- SCMB −0.6%, better
- PWZ 3.97%, better
- SCMB 3.70%
- PWZ 1302
- SCMB 8203
- PWZ 782K sh
- SCMB 3.28M sh, better
- PWZ $23.03
- SCMB $24.87
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PWZ | SCMB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B60 | A99Higher |
| Mission | A92 | A96Higher |
| Risk | D35 | B57Higher |
| Tradability | C53 | A82Higher |
| Holdings | A73 | A81Higher |
| Durability | A81Higher | A72 |
Rank among Other Municipal Bond funds
Same Category. PWZ and SCMB are both graded against the same 63 Other Municipal Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PWZB
SCMBA
In short
PWZ A California-only muni ETF that has been running since 2007 and leans long: its index targets longer-dated, core-plus California bonds, federally tax-exempt, AMT-free, with cash paid out monthly.
SCMB Schwab's take on the core muni sleeve: three basis points, thousands of AMT-free bonds from across the country, and a monthly distribution. Bottom-of-the-table pricing, no frills attached.
Stated mandate
PWZ The fund is designed around the ICE BofAML California Long-Term Core Plus Municipal Securities Index and generally invests at least 80% of assets in index municipal securities that are federally tax-exempt.
SCMB The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of an index representing the U.S. AMT-free municipal bond market.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PWZ vs SCMB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PWZ vs SCMB Cost
Overpaying PWZ vs SCMB
$5,117
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PWZ 0.28%
$5,755
SCMB 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PWZ | SCMB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $509 | $55 | $454 |
| 20 | $1,976 | $216 | $1,760 |
| 30 | $5,755 | $638 | $5,117 |
- 0.28%PWZ
- 0.03%SCMB, cheaper
- Middle half of Other Municipal Bond funds
- Median 0.30%
SCMB cheapest of 63 funds
PWZ 24th cheapest of 63 funds
PWZ vs SCMB Dividends
- PWZ 3.97%, better
- SCMB 3.70%
- PWZ $0.92
- SCMB $0.92
- PWZ $0.08
- SCMB $0.09
- PWZ Oct 19, 2026
- SCMB Oct 1, 2026
- PWZ Oct 23, 2026
- SCMB Oct 7, 2026
- PWZ Monthly
- SCMB Monthly
Distribution history
PWZ vs SCMB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PWZ 8.2%SCMB 5.9%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- PWZ 0.01, betterSCMB −0.04
- Worst fall
- PWZ −17.1%SCMB −6.7%
- Market sensitivity
- PWZ 1.26SCMB 0.96
PWZ and SCMB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.28% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.28% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.28% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
