TSLS ranks 3rd and QCMD 28th of 43 funds in the Single-Stock Inverse Category.
QCMD vs TSLS
TSLS −0.05pt a year
1.00%0.95%
TSLS 19.6×the volume
20.9K410K
QCMD vs TSLS Performance
−14.5%+1.0%
- QCMD 1.00%
- TSLS 0.95%, better
- QCMD $2M
- TSLS $39M
- QCMD −14.5%
- TSLS +1.0%, better
- QCMD 3.20%, better
- TSLS 3.11%
- QCMD 4
- TSLS 4
- QCMD 20.9K sh
- TSLS 410K sh, better
- QCMD $15.58
- TSLS $50.04
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | QCMD | TSLS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A89 | A97Higher |
| Mission | A82 | A87Higher |
| Risk | B65 | A75Higher |
| Tradability | D32 | C45Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | C41 | A82Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Inverse funds
Same Category. QCMD and TSLS are both graded against the same 43 Single-Stock Inverse funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
QCMDC
TSLSA
In short
QCMD A one-for-one short on Qualcomm in an ETF wrapper: no margin account, no borrow, just -100% of QCOM's move, reset daily. Priced at 1.00% net of a waiver through September 1, 2027.
TSLS The plain short on Tesla: TSLS aims for -1x the stock's daily move, with no leverage stacked on top. Among the small group of Tesla bear funds, it is the cheapest, and the one that dials risk down rather than up.
Stated mandate
QCMD The fund seeks daily inverse investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to the performance of QUALCOMM Incorporated common shares.
TSLS The Fund seeks daily inverse investment results by maintaining short exposure to TSLA of approximately -100% of its net assets and generally rebalancing that exposure each trading day.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
QCMD vs TSLS Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
QCMD vs TSLS Cost
Overpaying QCMD vs TSLS
$819
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
QCMD 1.00%
$18,688
TSLS 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | QCMD | TSLS | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,763 | $1,678 | $85 |
| 20 | $6,625 | $6,322 | $303 |
| 30 | $18,688 | $17,869 | $819 |
- 1.00%QCMD
- 0.95%TSLS, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Inverse funds
- Median 1.05%
TSLS 2nd cheapest of 43 funds
QCMD 8th cheapest of 43 funds
QCMD vs TSLS Dividends
- QCMD 3.20%, better
- TSLS 3.11%
- QCMD $0.55
- TSLS $1.57
- QCMD $0.11
- TSLS $0.40
- QCMD Sep 22, 2026
- TSLS Sep 22, 2026
- QCMD Sep 29, 2026
- TSLS Sep 29, 2026
- QCMD Quarterly
- TSLS Quarterly
Distribution history
QCMD vs TSLS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- QCMD 59.4%TSLS 51.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- QCMD −0.15TSLS −0.76
- Worst fall
- QCMD −56.0%TSLS −90.7%
- Market sensitivity
- QCMD −3.60TSLS −1.41
QCMD and TSLS in the news
Popular comparisons
- 1.00% · 0.96%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.96%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
