Skip to content

QDF vs VIG

Northern Trust Quality Dividend ETF

QDFCNYSE Arca

Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF

VIGANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

VIG −0.35pt a year

QDF0.39%VIG0.04%

Avg volume · 30D

VIG 41.7×the volume

QDF24.5KVIG1.02M

10Y return · a year

VIG +1.7pt

QDF+12.1%VIG+13.8%

QDF vs VIG Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+71.6%QDF+65.3%VIG

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. QDF +71.6%. VIG +65.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%0%20%40%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
QDF 0.39%
VIG 0.04%, better
Fund size
QDF $2.17B
VIG $128B
1Y total return
QDF +14.5%
VIG +16.0%, better
Yield (12M)
QDF 1.51%, better
VIG 1.47%
Holdings
QDF 143
VIG 335
Avg volume (30D)
QDF 24.5K sh
VIG 1.02M sh, better
NAV per share
QDF $90.50
VIG $247.72
52W range

ETF.net Grade

QDF: Cost 36, Risk 40, Mission 62, Tradability 68, Holdings 37, Durability 69. VIG: Cost 100, Risk 62, Mission 84, Tradability 59, Holdings 52, Durability 92.
Pillar letters and Scores for QDF, VIG, with each pillar’s weight
PillarQDFVIG
Cost30% weightD36A100Higher
Mission25% weightB62A84Higher
Risk15% weightC40B62Higher
Tradability15% weightB68HigherB59
Holdings10% weightD37C52Higher
Durability5% weightB69A92Higher

Rank among US Dividend Index funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. QDF and VIG are both graded against the same 52 US Dividend Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Dividend Index⁠

Category · 52 funds
See all 52 ›

VIG ranks 5th and QDF 37th of 52 funds in the US Dividend Index Category.

  1. Rank 4ASPYDState Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETFScore 79
  2. Rank 5AVIGVanguard Dividend Appreciation ETFScore 78
  3. Rank 6ADLNWisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend FundScore 74
  4. Rank 37COUSAALPS Funds O’Shares U.S. Quality Dividend ETFScore 49
  5. Rank 37CQDFNorthern Trust Quality Dividend ETFScore 49
  6. Rank 40COUSMALPS O'Shares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETFScore 48

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

QDFCNorthern Trust Quality Dividend ETF

VIGAVanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF

In short

QDF A dividend screen that doesn't want to be a bond proxy: QDF ranks large and mid-cap US payers on dividend quality, then targets beta similar to its parent index. 0.39% net of a waiver through March 1, 2027.

VIG VIG buys dividend growth, not fat yields: about 300 US companies with a record of raising their payouts, tracked for 0.04% a year. Running since 2006 and now north of $100 billion, it is the plain-vanilla anchor of the dividend-screen aisle.

Stated mandate

QDF The fund seeks to track the Northern Trust Quality Dividend Index before fees and expenses. Its strategy uses a quality-focused dividend approach intended to pursue income and total return through U.S. equity securities.

VIG The fund seeks to track the S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index, which represents common stocks of companies with a record of increasing dividends over time.

Why people hold it

  • QDF The index starts with 1,250 large and mid-cap US companies, cuts non-payers, then drops the lowest-scoring quintile on a Dividend Quality Score built from financial health measures.flexshares.com
  • Quality is ranked sector by sector, an apples-to-apples comparison that surfaces payers across the market instead of crowding into the usual high-yield corners.flexshares.com
  • The index targets overall beta similar to the Northern Trust 1250 parent, so the yield tilt is not built around a defensive, low-beta portfolio.flexshares.com
  • Live since December 2012, a multi-billion-dollar fund holding roughly 140 stocks and paying quarterly.
  • VIG At 0.04% a year, the fee is roughly a tenth of the typical dividend-screen fund's 0.39%, and undercuts every other top-graded fund in the group, DGRO and SCHD included.
  • The screen rewards a record of increasing dividends rather than the biggest current payout, so the basket leans on payout discipline instead of stretched yields.
  • Live since 2006, over $100 billion in assets and actively traded, which shows up as easy fills rather than wide spreads.
  • About 300 holdings, cash paid quarterly, and one of the strongest overall implementations in its dividend-screen peer group.

Worth knowing

  • QDF At 0.39% (net of a waiver through March 1, 2027) the fee lands near the category median, but well above index rivals like SCHD at 0.06% and VIG at 0.04%.
  • Trades less actively than the category's largest funds, so limit orders are the sane way in and out.
  • FlexShares flags that the fund can sit more than 25% in one industry and uses representative sampling, which can widen the gap between fund and index returns.flexshares.com
  • VIG Growth of payouts, not maximum income, is the mandate. That puts it on a different axis than high-dividend funds such as SPYD.
  • US stocks only, no bonds and no overseas payers, and sector weights are whatever the index screen spits out.
  • Portfolio risk and concentration measures land mid-pack for the category: it is fully invested in equities and drops when the market drops.

Full QDF profile⁠

Full VIG profile⁠

QDF vs VIG Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

QDF vs VIG Cost

Overpaying QDF vs VIG

$7,049

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • QDF 0.39%

    $7,898

  • VIG 0.04%

    $849

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • QDF 0.39%
  • VIG 0.04%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K051015202530QDF $7,898VIG $849

Year by year

YearQDFVIGOverpaying
10$705$73$632
20$2,725$288$2,437
30$7,898$849$7,049

Expense ratio

  • 0.39%QDF
  • 0.04%VIG, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Dividend Index funds
  • Median 0.35%

VIG cheapest of 52 funds

QDF 32nd cheapest of 52 funds

QDF vs VIG Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
QDF 1.51%, better
VIG 1.47%
Payout (12M)
QDF $1.37
VIG $3.65
Last payment
QDF $0.35
VIG $0.93
Ex-dividend
QDF Sep 18, 2026
VIG Sep 28, 2026
Paid on
QDF Sep 24, 2026
VIG Sep 30, 2026
Frequency
QDF Quarterly
VIG Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

QDFQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll QDF payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 20, 2017 $0.24; Jun 19, 2017 $0.28; Sep 18, 2017 $0.30; Dec 21, 2017 $0.40; Mar 19, 2018 $0.18; Jun 18, 2018 $0.31; Sep 24, 2018 $0.33; Dec 21, 2018 $0.89; Mar 15, 2019 $0.20; Jun 21, 2019 $0.39; Sep 20, 2019 $0.25; Dec 20, 2019 $0.63; Mar 20, 2020 $0.26; Jun 19, 2020 $0.33; Sep 18, 2020 $0.27; Dec 18, 2020 $0.31; Mar 19, 2021 $0.23; Jun 18, 2021 $0.27; Sep 17, 2021 $0.29; Dec 17, 2021 $0.37; Mar 18, 2022 $0.25; Jun 17, 2022 $0.33; Sep 16, 2022 $0.32; Dec 16, 2022 $0.39; Mar 17, 2023 $0.21; Jun 16, 2023 $0.39; Sep 15, 2023 $0.29; Dec 15, 2023 $0.45; Mar 15, 2024 $0.19; Jun 21, 2024 $0.34; Sep 20, 2024 $0.34; Dec 20, 2024 $0.48; Mar 21, 2025 $0.19; Jun 20, 2025 $0.35; Sep 19, 2025 $0.32; Dec 19, 2025 $0.47; Mar 20, 2026 $0.20; Jun 18, 2026 $0.36; Sep 18, 2026 $0.35. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD
VIGQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll VIG payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 29, 2017 $0.43; Jun 21, 2017 $0.52; Sep 20, 2017 $0.43; Dec 21, 2017 $0.55; Mar 26, 2018 $0.40; Jun 28, 2018 $0.57; Sep 26, 2018 $0.50; Dec 17, 2018 $0.58; Mar 28, 2019 $0.51; Jun 17, 2019 $0.47; Sep 24, 2019 $0.55; Dec 18, 2019 $0.60; Mar 26, 2020 $0.47; Jun 29, 2020 $0.60; Sep 29, 2020 $0.56; Dec 21, 2020 $0.66; Mar 22, 2021 $0.51; Jun 21, 2021 $0.68; Sep 20, 2021 $0.70; Dec 20, 2021 $0.77; Mar 21, 2022 $0.69; Jun 21, 2022 $0.69; Sep 19, 2022 $0.72; Dec 20, 2022 $0.87; Mar 24, 2023 $0.75; Jun 29, 2023 $0.77; Sep 28, 2023 $0.77; Dec 21, 2023 $0.92; Mar 22, 2024 $0.77; Jun 28, 2024 $0.90; Sep 27, 2024 $0.84; Dec 23, 2024 $0.88; Mar 27, 2025 $0.94; Jun 30, 2025 $0.87; Sep 29, 2025 $0.86; Dec 22, 2025 $0.88; Mar 27, 2026 $0.83; Jun 26, 2026 $1.00; Sep 28, 2026 $0.93. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD

QDF vs VIG Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • QDF
  • VIG
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: QDF −22.1% · Sep 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%−15%−10%−5%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
QDF 11.3%VIG 10.6%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
QDF 1.34, betterVIG 1.33
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
QDF −22.1%VIG −20.4%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
QDF 0.92VIG 0.82

QDF and VIG in the news

Popular comparisons

  • QDFCvsDGROA

    Northern Trust Quality Dividend ETF · iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • VIGAvsDGROA

    Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF · iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.04% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QDFCvsSCHDA

    Northern Trust Quality Dividend ETF · Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.06%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • VIGAvsSCHDA

    Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF · Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.04% · 0.06%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QDFCvsDIVBA

    Northern Trust Quality Dividend ETF · iShares Core Dividend ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.05%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • VIGAvsDIVBA

    Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF · iShares Core Dividend ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.04% · 0.05%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.