RWM ranks 4th and QID 11th of 53 funds in the Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) Category.
QID vs RWM
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.95%0.95%
RWM 1.1×the volume
28.3M30M
RWM +26.1pt
−37.2%−11.1%
QID vs RWM Performance
−78.4%−18.3%
- QID 0.95%
- RWM 0.95%
- QID $311M
- RWM $163M
- QID −19.2%
- RWM −10.2%, better
- QID 5.55%, better
- RWM 3.32%
- QID 8
- RWM 3
- QID 28.3M sh
- RWM 30M sh, better
- QID $15.09
- RWM $14.37
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | QID | RWM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | C50 |
| Mission | A98 | |
| Risk | D34 | B61Higher |
| Tradability | A90 | A90 |
| Holdings | B55 | B63Higher |
| Durability | A71Higher | B69 |
Rank among Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. QID and RWM are both graded against the same 53 Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
QIDB
RWMB
In short
QID One of ProShares' original geared funds, live since 2006: QID aims for two times the inverse of the Nasdaq-100's daily move, resetting every night. Fee is 0.95% net of a waiver through September 30, 2027.
RWM Short small caps at one speed: RWM targets the inverse of the Russell 2000's daily move, with no 2x or 3x multiplier on top. Trading since 2007, at 0.95% net of a waiver through September 30, 2027.
Stated mandate
QID The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to two times the inverse performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index.
RWM The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to the inverse of the Russell 2000 Index's daily performance.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
QID vs RWM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
QID vs RWM Cost
Same expense ratio
$17,869
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
QID 0.95%
$17,869
RWM 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | QID | RWM |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $1,678 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $6,322 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $17,869 |
- 0.95%QID
- 0.95%RWM
- Middle half of Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
QID 6th cheapest of 53 funds
RWM 6th cheapest of 53 funds
QID vs RWM Dividends
- QID 5.55%, better
- RWM 3.32%
- QID $0.84
- RWM $0.48
- QID $0.17
- RWM $0.09
- QID Sep 23, 2026
- RWM Sep 23, 2026
- QID Sep 29, 2026
- RWM Sep 29, 2026
- QID Quarterly
- RWM Quarterly
Distribution history
QID vs RWM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- QID
- RWM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- QID 32.9%RWM 18.4%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- QID −1.37RWM −0.99, better
- Worst fall
- QID −89.3%RWM −43.7%, better
- Market sensitivity
- QID −2.33RWM −1.23
QID and RWM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
