QLD ranks 1st and USLV 89th of 95 funds in the Leveraged Long (2x & Other) Category.
QLD vs USLV
QLD −0.21pt a year
0.89%1.10%
QLD 27.0×the volume
4.15M153K
QLD vs USLV Performance
−4.0%−29.6%
- QLD 0.89%, better
- USLV 1.10%
- QLD $13.3B
- USLV $13M
- QLD +7.6%
- USLV
- QLD 0.15%
- USLV
- QLD 113
- USLV 7
- QLD 4.15M sh, better
- USLV 153K sh
- QLD $82.56
- USLV $8.85
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | QLD | USLV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A72Higher | F17 |
| Mission | A95 | |
| Risk | B66Higher | F16 |
| Tradability | A100Higher | C46 |
| Holdings | A72 | |
| Durability | A81Higher | C44 |
Rank among Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. QLD and USLV are both graded against the same 95 Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
QLDA
USLVD
In short
QLD The 2x dial on the Nasdaq-100. QLD aims for twice the index's daily move, half the dose of the 3x crowd, and it has been running that playbook since 2006. The multiple resets every session.
USLV Silver leverage without the futures plumbing: USLV targets 200% of silver's daily move by referencing SLV, the physically backed silver trust, in a 1940 Act fund that trades like any stock and skips the K-1.
Stated mandate
QLD The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to twice the daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index.
USLV The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 200% of Silver's price performance before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
QLD vs USLV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
QLD vs USLV Cost
Overpaying USLV vs QLD
$3,419
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
QLD 0.89%
$16,872
USLV 1.10%
$20,291
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | QLD | USLV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,576 | $1,931 | $355 |
| 20 | $5,953 | $7,225 | $1,272 |
| 30 | $16,872 | $20,291 | $3,419 |
- 0.89%QLD, cheaper
- 1.10%USLV
- Middle half of Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
QLD 28th cheapest of 95 funds
USLV 83rd cheapest of 95 funds
QLD vs USLV Dividends
- QLD 0.15%
- USLV
- QLD $0.12
- USLV
- QLD $0.03
- USLV $0.07
- QLD Sep 23, 2026
- USLV Sep 22, 2026
- QLD Sep 29, 2026
- USLV Sep 29, 2026
- QLD Quarterly
- USLV Quarterly
Distribution history
QLD vs USLV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- QLD 36.7%USLV
- Return per unit of risk
- QLD 1.04USLV
- Worst fall
- QLD −63.7%USLV
- Market sensitivity
- QLD 2.46USLV 0.00
QLD and USLV in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.89% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.10% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.10% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.10% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
