QLD ranks 1st and WXET 30th of 95 funds in the Leveraged Long (2x & Other) Category.
QLD vs WXET
QLD −0.06pt a year
0.89%0.95%
QLD 214.3×the volume
4.15M19.3K
QLD vs WXET Performance
+7.6%−1.9%
- QLD 0.89%, better
- WXET 0.95%
- QLD $13.3B
- WXET $6M
- QLD +7.6%, better
- WXET −1.9%
- QLD 0.15%
- WXET 2.04%, better
- QLD 113
- WXET 3
- QLD 4.15M sh, better
- WXET 19.3K sh
- QLD $82.56
- WXET $16.51
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | QLD | WXET |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A72Higher | C51 |
| Mission | A95 | |
| Risk | B66Higher | C45 |
| Tradability | A100Higher | C51 |
| Holdings | A72 | |
| Durability | A81Higher | C41 |
Rank among Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. QLD and WXET are both graded against the same 95 Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
QLDA
WXETC
In short
QLD The 2x dial on the Nasdaq-100. QLD aims for twice the index's daily move, half the dose of the 3x crowd, and it has been running that playbook since 2006. The multiple resets every session.
WXET Wheat, doubled. WXET aims for twice the daily move of wheat futures inside a regular brokerage account: no futures broker, no K-1 at tax time. A daily-reset trading tool from the shop that built its name on grains.
Stated mandate
QLD The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to twice the daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index.
WXET The fund seeks, before fees and expenses, to deliver twice the daily price performance of wheat. It is designed for short-term trading and does not seek to meet its objective over periods longer than one day.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
QLD vs WXET Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
QLD vs WXET Cost
Overpaying WXET vs QLD
$997
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
QLD 0.89%
$16,872
WXET 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | QLD | WXET | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,576 | $1,678 | $102 |
| 20 | $5,953 | $6,322 | $369 |
| 30 | $16,872 | $17,869 | $997 |
- 0.89%QLD, cheaper
- 0.95%WXET
- Middle half of Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
QLD 28th cheapest of 95 funds
WXET 32nd cheapest of 95 funds
QLD vs WXET Dividends
- QLD 0.15%
- WXET 2.04%, better
- QLD $0.12
- WXET $0.34
- QLD $0.03
- WXET $0.03
- QLD Sep 23, 2026
- WXET Oct 26, 2026
- QLD Sep 29, 2026
- WXET Oct 27, 2026
- QLD Quarterly
- WXET Monthly
Distribution history
QLD vs WXET Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- QLD 36.7%WXET 47.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- QLD 1.04WXET −0.22
- Worst fall
- QLD −63.7%WXET −45.6%
- Market sensitivity
- QLD 2.46WXET −0.13
QLD and WXET in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.89% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
