QLVE ranks 7th and ROAM 8th of 20 funds in the Emerging Markets Multifactor Category.
QLVE vs ROAM
QLVE −0.26pt a year
0.18%0.44%
ROAM 44.4×the volume
40417.9K
ROAM +4.4pt
+7.0%+11.4%
QLVE vs ROAM Performance
+40.2%+71.5%
- QLVE 0.18%, better
- ROAM 0.44%
- QLVE $16M
- ROAM $102M
- QLVE +11.2%
- ROAM +19.6%, better
- QLVE 3.17%, better
- ROAM 2.50%
- QLVE 155
- ROAM 349
- QLVE 404 sh
- ROAM 17.9K sh, better
- QLVE $32.48
- ROAM $33.97
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | QLVE | ROAM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100Higher | C53 |
| Mission | A93 | |
| Risk | B66 | A78Higher |
| Tradability | F11 | C43Higher |
| Holdings | D32 | A88Higher |
| Durability | D33 | C46Higher |
Rank among Emerging Markets Multifactor funds
Same Category. QLVE and ROAM are both graded against the same 20 Emerging Markets Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
QLVEB
ROAMB
In short
QLVE Most emerging-markets factor funds chase value. QLVE goes the other way: cut the weakest fifth on quality, then optimize what is left toward lower volatility. Cost is 0.18% net of a waiver through March 1, 2027.
ROAM Emerging markets, rebuilt by rulebook: ROAM's index screens roughly 300 stocks for value, quality and momentum, and is built to balance risk against return instead of letting the biggest markets set the agenda.
Stated mandate
QLVE The Fund is designed for investors seeking emerging-markets exposure with an emphasis on quality and low volatility. It seeks to match, before fees and expenses, the performance of the Northern Trust Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index.
ROAM The Fund seeks to track the total return of the Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets Equity Index, a rules-based emerging-markets equity index designed to balance risk and return while emphasizing favorable factor characteristics.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
QLVE vs ROAM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
QLVE vs ROAM Cost
Overpaying ROAM vs QLVE
$5,103
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
QLVE 0.18%
$3,749
ROAM 0.44%
$8,852
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | QLVE | ROAM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $328 | $794 | $466 |
| 20 | $1,281 | $3,061 | $1,780 |
| 30 | $3,749 | $8,852 | $5,103 |
- 0.18%QLVE, cheaper
- 0.44%ROAM
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Multifactor funds
- Median 0.44%
QLVE cheapest of 20 funds
ROAM 10th cheapest of 20 funds
QLVE vs ROAM Dividends
- QLVE 3.17%, better
- ROAM 2.50%
- QLVE $1.02
- ROAM $0.84
- QLVE $0.34
- ROAM $0.33
- QLVE Sep 18, 2026
- ROAM Jun 25, 2026
- QLVE Sep 24, 2026
- ROAM Jun 29, 2026
- QLVE Quarterly
- ROAM Twice a year
Distribution history
QLVE vs ROAM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- QLVE
- ROAM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- QLVE 11.0%, betterROAM 14.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- QLVE 1.11ROAM 1.21, better
- Worst fall
- QLVE −23.6%, betterROAM −26.1%
- Market sensitivity
- QLVE 0.83ROAM 1.01
Popular comparisons
- 0.18% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.44% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.36%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.44% · 0.36%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.44% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.