QMOM ranks 4th and RSMV 17th of 20 funds in the US Active Momentum Category.
QMOM vs RSMV
QMOM −0.67pt a year
0.28%0.95%
QMOM 4.8×the volume
20.9K4.38K
QMOM vs RSMV Performance
+5.2%+2.7%
- QMOM 0.28%, better
- RSMV 0.95%
- QMOM $383M
- RSMV $17M
- QMOM +5.2%, better
- RSMV +2.7%
- QMOM 0.52%
- RSMV
- QMOM 52
- RSMV 35
- QMOM 20.9K sh, better
- RSMV 4.38K sh
- QMOM $66.09
- RSMV $26.69
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | QMOM | RSMV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A85Higher | F15 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | F24 | B63Higher |
| Tradability | A70Higher | D30 |
| Holdings | A77Higher | A70 |
| Durability | A88Higher | C44 |
Rank among US Active Momentum funds
Same Category. QMOM and RSMV are both graded against the same 20 US Active Momentum funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
QMOMA
RSMVD
In short
QMOM Momentum, undiluted. Where most factor funds spread the bet across hundreds of names, QMOM concentrates on roughly 50 of the strongest-trending U.S. stocks, with a quality screen layered on top.
RSMV Momentum with a brake pedal. RSMV rides US large-cap growth leaders on relative strength, then can duck into cash, Treasuries, or investment-grade bonds when volatility spikes. An active take on a corner of the market dominated by index funds.
Stated mandate
QMOM QMOM seeks long-term capital appreciation by maintaining consistent exposure to the strongest-momentum stocks in the U.S. market.
RSMV The Fund seeks capital appreciation through an actively managed portfolio primarily invested in common stocks of U.S. growth companies, generally emphasizing large-cap issuers. It may move into cash, U.S. Treasuries, or investment-grade fixed income for defensive purposes during periods of high volatility.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
QMOM vs RSMV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
QMOM vs RSMV Cost
Overpaying RSMV vs QMOM
$12,114
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
QMOM 0.28%
$5,755
RSMV 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | QMOM | RSMV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $509 | $1,678 | $1,169 |
| 20 | $1,976 | $6,322 | $4,346 |
| 30 | $5,755 | $17,869 | $12,114 |
- 0.28%QMOM, cheaper
- 0.95%RSMV
- Middle half of US Active Momentum funds
- Median 0.64%
QMOM 4th cheapest of 20 funds
RSMV 17th cheapest of 20 funds
QMOM vs RSMV Dividends
- QMOM 0.52%
- RSMV
- QMOM $0.35
- RSMV
- QMOM $0.35
- RSMV $0.27
- QMOM Dec 23, 2025
- RSMV Dec 24, 2025
- QMOM Dec 24, 2025
- RSMV Dec 26, 2025
- QMOM Annual
- RSMV Irregular
Distribution history
QMOM vs RSMV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- QMOM 20.0%RSMV 11.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- QMOM 0.84RSMV 0.11
- Worst fall
- QMOM −26.8%RSMV −17.6%
- Market sensitivity
- QMOM 1.32RSMV 0.74
Popular comparisons
- 0.28% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.28% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.28% · 0.13%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.13%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.