ROM ranks 3rd and QQXL 25th of 95 funds in the Leveraged Long (2x & Other) Category.
QQXL vs ROM
ROM −0.03pt a year
0.96%0.93%
ROM 23.0×the volume
2.19K50.3K
QQXL vs ROM Performance
+8.5%+23.8%
- QQXL 0.96%
- ROM 0.93%, better
- QQXL $4M
- ROM $962M
- QQXL +8.5%
- ROM +23.8%, better
- QQXL 1.19%, better
- ROM 0.03%
- QQXL 32
- ROM 86
- QQXL 2.19K sh
- ROM 50.3K sh, better
- QQXL $43.17
- ROM $110.30
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | QQXL | ROM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C51 | A70Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C52Higher | C49 |
| Tradability | B58 | A88Higher |
| Holdings | C52 | |
| Durability | C52 | A80Higher |
Rank among Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. QQXL and ROM are both graded against the same 95 Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
QQXLC
ROMA
In short
QQXL The first ETF to aim 2x daily leverage at just the top 30 names of the Nasdaq-100 instead of all 100. Same mega-cap engine as the classic leveraged Nasdaq trade, with the back half of the index left on the cutting room floor.
ROM The original 2x tech trade. Since 2007, ROM has aimed at twice the daily move of the S&P 500's technology sector: a double dose in a category now stacked with triples.
Stated mandate
QQXL The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to twice the daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 Top 30 Index.
ROM ROM seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to twice the daily performance of the S&P Technology Select Sector SM Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
QQXL vs ROM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
QQXL vs ROM Cost
Overpaying QQXL vs ROM
$495
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
QQXL 0.96%
$18,034
ROM 0.93%
$17,539
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | QQXL | ROM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,695 | $1,644 | $51 |
| 20 | $6,383 | $6,199 | $184 |
| 30 | $18,034 | $17,539 | $495 |
- 0.96%QQXL
- 0.93%ROM, cheaper
- Middle half of Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
ROM 29th cheapest of 95 funds
QQXL 66th cheapest of 95 funds
QQXL vs ROM Dividends
- QQXL 1.19%, better
- ROM 0.03%
- QQXL $0.55
- ROM $0.04
- QQXL $0.12
- ROM $0.02
- QQXL Sep 23, 2026
- ROM Mar 25, 2026
- QQXL Sep 29, 2026
- ROM Mar 31, 2026
- QQXL Quarterly
- ROM Quarterly
Distribution history
QQXL vs ROM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- QQXL 51.0%ROM 49.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- QQXL 0.58ROM 0.97
- Worst fall
- QQXL −33.4%ROM −67.6%
- Market sensitivity
- QQXL 3.56ROM 3.09
Popular comparisons
- 0.96% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.93% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.96% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.93% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.96% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.93% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.