REMX ranks 1st and REXC 9th of 12 funds in the Critical Materials Category.
REMX vs REXC
REMX −0.12pt a year
0.53%0.65%
REMX 4.6×the volume
731K160K
REMX vs REXC Performance
−24.2%−15.5%
- REMX 0.53%, better
- REXC 0.65%
- REMX $1.45B
- REXC $74M
- REMX −27.9%
- REXC
- REMX 2.60%
- REXC
- REMX 36
- REXC 42
- REMX 731K sh, better
- REXC 160K sh
- REMX $50.59
- REXC $13.17
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | REMX | REXC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A89Higher | D38 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | D33Higher | D27 |
| Tradability | A94Higher | B64 |
| Holdings | B60Higher | D27 |
| Durability | A89Higher | C51 |
Rank among Critical Materials funds
Same Category. REMX and REXC are both graded against the same 12 Critical Materials funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
REMXA
REXCD
In short
REMX The original rare earths ETF. Trading since 2010, it holds roughly 30 miners, refiners and recyclers of the metals behind magnets, EV motors and defense hardware, in one concentrated global basket priced under most of its critical-materials rivals.
REXC Rare earths, with China screened out. REXC tracks a Nasdaq index built around rare earth miners and processors outside China, the focused cut of Sprott's critical-materials lineup.
Stated mandate
REMX The fund seeks global exposure to companies involved in producing, refining, and recycling rare earth and strategic metals and minerals, while tracking the MVIS Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index before fees and expenses.
REXC The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Nasdaq Sprott Rare Earths Ex-China Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
REMX vs REXC Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
REMX vs REXC Cost
Overpaying REXC vs REMX
$2,181
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
REMX 0.53%
$10,536
REXC 0.65%
$12,717
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | REMX | REXC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $953 | $1,163 | $210 |
| 20 | $3,658 | $4,440 | $782 |
| 30 | $10,536 | $12,717 | $2,181 |
- 0.53%REMX, cheaper
- 0.65%REXC
- Middle half of Critical Materials funds
- Median 0.64%
REMX 2nd cheapest of 12 funds
REXC 7th cheapest of 12 funds
REMX vs REXC Dividends
- REMX 2.60%
- REXC
- REMX $1.30
- REXC None
- REMX $1.30
- REXC
- REMX Dec 22, 2025
- REXC
- REMX Dec 26, 2025
- REXC
- REMX Annual
- REXC
Distribution history
REMX vs REXC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- REMX 45.2%REXC
- Return per unit of risk
- REMX 0.06REXC
- Worst fall
- REMX −73.3%REXC
- Market sensitivity
- REMX 1.54REXC 2.56
REMX and REXC in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.53% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.53% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.53% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





