EART ranks 3rd and REXC 9th of 12 funds in the Critical Materials Category.
EART vs REXC
EART −0.06pt a year
0.59%0.65%
REXC 9.4×the volume
17.1K160K
EART vs REXC Performance
−12.9%−15.5%
- EART 0.59%, better
- REXC 0.65%
- EART $41M
- REXC $74M
- EART 0.79%
- REXC
- EART 55
- REXC 42
- EART 17.1K sh
- REXC 160K sh, better
- EART $24.00
- REXC $13.17
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EART | REXC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B69Higher | D38 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C45Higher | D27 |
| Tradability | C45 | B64Higher |
| Holdings | A72Higher | D27 |
| Durability | A70Higher | C51 |
Rank among Critical Materials funds
Same Category. EART and REXC are both graded against the same 12 Critical Materials funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EARTB
REXCD
In short
EART Rare earths are the headline, but the basket runs wider: ten critical-material categories, from copper and lithium to cobalt and carbon fiber, screened so miners must earn at least half their revenue from the stuff.
REXC Rare earths, with China screened out. REXC tracks a Nasdaq index built around rare earth miners and processors outside China, the focused cut of Sprott's critical-materials lineup.
Stated mandate
EART The fund seeks exposure to companies producing rare-earth components, metals, and other raw or composite materials needed for expanding critical technologies, including electric vehicles, energy storage, robotics, and radar systems.
REXC The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Nasdaq Sprott Rare Earths Ex-China Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EART vs REXC Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EART vs REXC Cost
Overpaying REXC vs EART
$1,082
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EART 0.59%
$11,635
REXC 0.65%
$12,717
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EART | REXC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,058 | $1,163 | $105 |
| 20 | $4,051 | $4,440 | $389 |
| 30 | $11,635 | $12,717 | $1,082 |
- 0.59%EART, cheaper
- 0.65%REXC
- Middle half of Critical Materials funds
- Median 0.64%
EART 5th cheapest of 12 funds
REXC 7th cheapest of 12 funds
EART vs REXC Dividends
- EART 0.79%
- REXC
- EART $0.19
- REXC None
- EART $0.14
- REXC
- EART Jun 29, 2026
- REXC
- EART Jul 7, 2026
- REXC
- EART Twice a year
- REXC
Distribution history
EART vs REXC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Market sensitivity
- EART 1.29REXC 2.56
EART and REXC in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.59% · 0.53%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.53%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.



