UFOX ranks 1st and ROKT 2nd of 15 funds in the Space Category.
ROKT vs UFOX
UFOX −0.15pt a year
0.45%0.30%
UFOX 1.5×the volume
21.1K31K
ROKT +4.7pt
+21.3%+16.6%
ROKT vs UFOX Performance
+162.6%+115.5%
- ROKT 0.45%
- UFOX 0.30%, better
- ROKT $156M
- UFOX $797M
- ROKT +27.9%, better
- UFOX +14.5%
- ROKT 0.20%
- UFOX 0.48%, better
- ROKT 38
- UFOX 63
- ROKT 21.1K sh
- UFOX 31K sh, better
- ROKT $106.01
- UFOX $77.37
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ROKT | UFOX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A86 | A100Higher |
| Mission | C44 | |
| Risk | A74Higher | B62 |
| Tradability | A74 | A76Higher |
| Holdings | A84Higher | A83 |
| Durability | A87Higher | A84 |
Rank among Space funds
Same Category. ROKT and UFOX are both graded against the same 15 Space funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ROKTA
UFOXA
In short
ROKT Most space funds stop at the atmosphere. ROKT plays both frontiers: rockets and satellites plus the hardware that explores the deep sea, wrapped in an AI-informed S&P Kensho index running since 2018.
UFOX A space theme without the space-theme price tag. UFOX tracks a rules-based index of roughly 60 satellite and connectivity companies for 0.30%, a little over half what the typical global thematic fund charges.
Stated mandate
ROKT The fund seeks to track the S&P Kensho Final Frontiers Index, targeting companies whose products and services support innovation in outer-space and deep-sea exploration through an AI-informed, quantitative index methodology.
UFOX The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the BlueStar® Space and Connective Technologies Index. It uses passive indexing and generally invests in the index constituents.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ROKT vs UFOX Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ROKT vs UFOX Cost
Overpaying ROKT vs UFOX
$2,892
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ROKT 0.45%
$9,041
UFOX 0.30%
$6,149
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ROKT | UFOX | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $812 | $545 | $267 |
| 20 | $3,128 | $2,113 | $1,015 |
| 30 | $9,041 | $6,149 | $2,892 |
- 0.45%ROKT
- 0.30%UFOX, cheaper
- Middle half of Space funds
- Median 0.75%
UFOX cheapest of 15 funds
ROKT 3rd cheapest of 15 funds
ROKT vs UFOX Dividends
- ROKT 0.20%
- UFOX 0.48%, better
- ROKT $0.21
- UFOX $0.37
- ROKT $0.05
- UFOX $0.06
- ROKT Sep 21, 2026
- UFOX Sep 23, 2026
- ROKT Sep 23, 2026
- UFOX Sep 24, 2026
- ROKT Quarterly
- UFOX Quarterly
Distribution history
ROKT vs UFOX Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- ROKT
- UFOX
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ROKT 26.4%, betterUFOX 27.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- ROKT 1.23, betterUFOX 1.17
- Worst fall
- ROKT −27.6%, betterUFOX −33.9%
- Market sensitivity
- ROKT 1.43UFOX 1.58
Popular comparisons
- 0.45% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

