ROKT ranks 2nd and UFO 6th of 15 funds in the Space Category.
ROKT vs UFO
ROKT −0.30pt a year
0.45%0.75%
UFO 47.7×the volume
21.1K1M
ROKT +13.6pt
+21.3%+7.7%
ROKT vs UFO Performance
+162.6%+45.1%
- ROKT 0.45%, better
- UFO 0.75%
- ROKT $156M
- UFO $454M
- ROKT +27.9%, better
- UFO +7.1%
- ROKT 0.20%
- UFO 0.38%, better
- ROKT 38
- UFO 65
- ROKT 21.1K sh
- UFO 1M sh, better
- ROKT $106.01
- UFO $40.34
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ROKT | UFO |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A86Higher | D29 |
| Mission | C44 | |
| Risk | A74Higher | C45 |
| Tradability | A74 | A81Higher |
| Holdings | A84Higher | B66 |
| Durability | A87Higher | B64 |
Rank among Space funds
Same Category. ROKT and UFO are both graded against the same 15 Space funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ROKTA
UFOC
In short
ROKT Most space funds stop at the atmosphere. ROKT plays both frontiers: rockets and satellites plus the hardware that explores the deep sea, wrapped in an AI-informed S&P Kensho index running since 2018.
UFO UFO buys the space economy through a purpose-built benchmark, VettaFi's Space Index (formerly S-Network's), holding roughly 50 companies worldwide instead of leaning on a broad aerospace-and-defense proxy.
Stated mandate
ROKT The fund seeks to track the S&P Kensho Final Frontiers Index, targeting companies whose products and services support innovation in outer-space and deep-sea exploration through an AI-informed, quantitative index methodology.
UFO The fund aims to track the performance of the VettaFi Space Index, previously known as the S-Network Space Index, before accounting for fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ROKT vs UFO Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ROKT vs UFO Cost
Overpaying UFO vs ROKT
$5,441
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ROKT 0.45%
$9,041
UFO 0.75%
$14,482
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ROKT | UFO | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $812 | $1,336 | $524 |
| 20 | $3,128 | $5,078 | $1,950 |
| 30 | $9,041 | $14,482 | $5,441 |
- 0.45%ROKT, cheaper
- 0.75%UFO
- Middle half of Space funds
- Median 0.75%
ROKT 3rd cheapest of 15 funds
UFO 8th cheapest of 15 funds
ROKT vs UFO Dividends
- ROKT 0.20%
- UFO 0.38%, better
- ROKT $0.21
- UFO $0.15
- ROKT $0.05
- UFO $0.0041
- ROKT Sep 21, 2026
- UFO Sep 29, 2026
- ROKT Sep 23, 2026
- UFO Sep 30, 2026
- ROKT Quarterly
- UFO Quarterly
Distribution history
ROKT vs UFO Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- ROKT
- UFO
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ROKT 26.4%, betterUFO 38.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- ROKT 1.23, betterUFO 0.93
- Worst fall
- ROKT −27.6%, betterUFO −49.3%
- Market sensitivity
- ROKT 1.43UFO 1.86
ROKT and UFO in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.45% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


