Skip to content
etf.net

ROM vs TSYW

ProShares Ultra Technology

ROMANYSE Arca

Roundhill Treasury Bond Weeklypay ETF

TSYWCCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

ROM −0.06pt a year

ROM0.93%TSYW0.99%

Avg volume · 30D

ROM 15.5×the volume

ROM47.7KTSYW3.08K

ROM vs TSYW Performance

Dec 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+40.0%ROM−6.8%TSYW

Dec 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. ROM +40.0%. TSYW −6.8%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%20%60%80%Dec 2025Jun 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
ROM 0.93%, better
TSYW 0.99%
Fund size
ROM $1.15B
TSYW $3M
1Y total return
ROM +26.5%
TSYW No data
Yield (12M)
ROM 0.03%
TSYW No data
Holdings
ROM 85
TSYW 3
Avg volume (30D)
ROM 47.7K sh, better
TSYW 3.08K sh
NAV per share
ROM $132.18
TSYW $40.01
52W range

ETF.net Grade

ROM: Cost 70, Risk 56, Mission not scored, Tradability 88, Holdings not scored, Durability 81. TSYW: Cost 24, Risk 62, Mission not scored, Tradability 56, Holdings 36, Durability 39.
Pillar letters and Scores for ROM, TSYW, with each pillar’s weight
PillarROMTSYW
Cost30% weightA70HigherF24
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightB56B62Higher
Tradability15% weightA88HigherB56
Holdings10% weightNot scoredD36
Durability5% weightA81HigherD39

Rank among Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. ROM and TSYW are both graded against the same 95 Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Leveraged Long (2x & Other)⁠

Category · 95 funds
See all 95 ›

ROM ranks 3rd and TSYW 37th of 95 funds in the Leveraged Long (2x & Other) Category.

  1. Rank 1AQLDProShares Ultra QQQScore 77
  2. Rank 2AUYGProShares Ultra FinancialsScore 74
  3. Rank 3AROMProShares Ultra TechnologyScore 71
  4. Rank 4BDDMProShares Ultra Dow30Score 69
  5. Rank 37CTSXUDirexion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X ETFScore 40
  6. Rank 37CTSYWRoundhill Treasury Bond Weeklypay ETFScore 40
  7. Rank 37CUBRProShares Ultra MSCI Brazil CappedScore 40

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

ROMAProShares Ultra Technology

TSYWCRoundhill Treasury Bond Weeklypay ETF

In short

ROM The original 2x tech trade. Since 2007, ROM has aimed at twice the daily move of the S&P 500's technology sector: a double dose in a category now stacked with triples.

TSYW No data

Stated mandate

ROM ROM seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to twice the daily performance of the S&P Technology Select Sector SM Index.

TSYW No data

Why people hold it

  • ROM Two times, not three. A 2x daily target means smaller swings and less compounding drag than a 3x fund chasing the same sector.sec.gov
  • Live since January 2007, so it has run through the 2008 crash and the full tech cycle since. Long mileage is rare in geared funds.
  • 0.93% a year, flat, with no waiver propping it up. Peer QLD runs 0.89%, but only net of a waiver through September 30, 2027.
  • One of the strongest implementations in the leveraged-bull pack, from an issuer that has run geared funds since the category's early days.proshares.com

TSYW No data

Worth knowing

  • ROM The 2x target resets at each close, so results over weeks or months depend on the path the sector takes, not just where it ends up.sec.govproshares.com
  • Trades thinner than the category's headline names, so spreads and limit orders matter, especially in size.
  • About 80 tech names from the S&P 500. That is one concentrated sector bet, doubled, in both directions.

TSYW No data

Full ROM profile⁠

Full TSYW profile⁠

ROM vs TSYW Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

ROM vs TSYW Cost

Overpaying TSYW vs ROM

$986

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • ROM 0.93%

    $17,539

  • TSYW 0.99%

    $18,525

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • ROM 0.93%
  • TSYW 0.99%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530TSYW $18,525ROM $17,539

Year by year

YearROMTSYWOverpaying
10$1,644$1,746$102
20$6,199$6,565$366
30$17,539$18,525$986

Expense ratio

  • 0.93%ROM, cheaper
  • 0.99%TSYW
  • Middle half of Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
  • Median 0.95%

ROM 29th cheapest of 95 funds

TSYW 75th cheapest of 95 funds

ROM vs TSYW Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
ROM 0.03%
TSYW No data
Payout (12M)
ROM $0.04
TSYW No data
Last payment
ROM $0.02
TSYW $0.14
Ex-dividend
ROM Mar 25, 2026
TSYW Oct 26, 2026
Paid on
ROM Mar 31, 2026
TSYW Oct 27, 2026
Frequency
ROM Quarterly
TSYW Weekly

Distribution history

Per share, 2026, same scale for both

ROMQuarterly · 1 paymentAll ROM payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment in 2026 YTD. Mar 25, 2026 $0.02. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.102026YTD
TSYWWeekly · 43 paymentsAll TSYW payments⁠
One bar per payment. 43 payments in 2026 YTD. Jan 5, 2026 $0.12; Jan 12, 2026 $0.08; Jan 20, 2026 $0.12; Jan 26, 2026 $0.09; Feb 2, 2026 $0.10; Feb 9, 2026 $0.09; Feb 17, 2026 $0.13; Feb 23, 2026 $0.15; Mar 2, 2026 $0.12; Mar 9, 2026 $0.14; Mar 16, 2026 $0.08; Mar 23, 2026 $0.10; Mar 30, 2026 $0.14; Apr 6, 2026 $0.15; Apr 13, 2026 $0.14; Apr 20, 2026 $0.11; Apr 27, 2026 $0.13; May 4, 2026 $0.10; May 11, 2026 $0.10; May 18, 2026 $0.12; May 26, 2026 $0.06; Jun 1, 2026 $0.13; Jun 8, 2026 $0.12; Jun 15, 2026 $0.10; Jun 22, 2026 $0.12; Jun 29, 2026 $0.11; Jul 6, 2026 $0.11; Jul 13, 2026 $0.06; Jul 20, 2026 $0.07; Jul 27, 2026 $0.10; Aug 3, 2026 $0.07; Aug 10, 2026 $0.09; Aug 17, 2026 $0.11; Aug 24, 2026 $0.09; Aug 31, 2026 $0.11; Sep 8, 2026 $0.11; Sep 14, 2026 $0.10; Sep 21, 2026 $0.07; Sep 28, 2026 $0.12; Oct 5, 2026 $0.08; Oct 13, 2026 $0.10; Oct 19, 2026 $0.13; Oct 26, 2026 $0.14. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.102026YTD

ROM vs TSYW Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
ROM 49.3%TSYW No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
ROM 0.97TSYW No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
ROM −67.6%TSYW No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
ROM 3.09TSYW 0.13

Popular comparisons

  • ROMAvsQLDA

    ProShares Ultra Technology · ProShares Ultra QQQ

    Expense ratio
    0.93% · 0.89%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • TSYWCvsQLDA

    Roundhill Treasury Bond Weeklypay ETF · ProShares Ultra QQQ

    Expense ratio
    0.99% · 0.89%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • ROMAvsUYGA

    ProShares Ultra Technology · ProShares Ultra Financials

    Expense ratio
    0.93% · 0.93%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • TSYWCvsUYGA

    Roundhill Treasury Bond Weeklypay ETF · ProShares Ultra Financials

    Expense ratio
    0.99% · 0.93%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • ROMAvsDDMB

    ProShares Ultra Technology · ProShares Ultra Dow30

    Expense ratio
    0.93% · 0.95%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • TSYWCvsDDMB

    Roundhill Treasury Bond Weeklypay ETF · ProShares Ultra Dow30

    Expense ratio
    0.99% · 0.95%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.