Skip to content
etf.net

ROM vs TTXU

ProShares Ultra Technology

ROMANYSE Arca

Direxion Daily Technology Top 5 Bull 2X ETF

TTXUDNYSE Arca

Overlap

15.2%by weight

Expense ratio

ROM −0.05pt a year

ROM0.93%TTXU0.98%

Avg volume · 30D

ROM 6.0×the volume

ROM47.7KTTXU7.97K

ROM vs TTXU Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Nov 2, 2026

+19.3%ROM+13.5%TTXU

Oct 31, 2025 to Nov 2, 2026. ROM +19.3%. TTXU +13.5%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−40%−20%40%60%Oct 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
ROM 0.93%, better
TTXU 0.98%
Fund size
ROM $1.15B
TTXU $4M
1Y total return
ROM +19.3%, better
TTXU +13.5%
Yield (12M)
ROM 0.03%
TTXU No data
Holdings
ROM 85
TTXU 14
Avg volume (30D)
ROM 47.7K sh, better
TTXU 7.97K sh
NAV per share
ROM $132.18
TTXU $31.92
52W range

ETF.net Grade

ROM: Cost 70, Risk 56, Mission not scored, Tradability 88, Holdings not scored, Durability 81. TTXU: Cost 29, Risk 46, Mission not scored, Tradability 34, Holdings not scored, Durability 44.
Pillar letters and Scores for ROM, TTXU, with each pillar’s weight
PillarROMTTXU
Cost30% weightA70HigherD29
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightB56HigherC46
Tradability15% weightA88HigherD34
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightA81HigherC44

Rank among Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. ROM and TTXU are both graded against the same 95 Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Leveraged Long (2x & Other)⁠

Category · 95 funds
See all 95 ›

ROM ranks 3rd and TTXU 77th of 95 funds in the Leveraged Long (2x & Other) Category.

  1. Rank 1AQLDProShares Ultra QQQScore 78
  2. Rank 2AUYGProShares Ultra FinancialsScore 73
  3. Rank 3AROMProShares Ultra TechnologyScore 71
  4. Rank 4BDDMProShares Ultra Dow30Score 69
  5. Rank 77DNUGTDirexion Daily Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETFScore 34
  6. Rank 77DTTXUDirexion Daily Technology Top 5 Bull 2X ETFScore 34
  7. Rank 79DINDLDirexion Daily MSCI India Bull 2X ETFScore 33

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

ROMAProShares Ultra Technology

TTXUDDirexion Daily Technology Top 5 Bull 2X ETF

In short

ROM The original 2x tech trade. Since 2007, ROM has aimed at twice the daily move of the S&P 500's technology sector: a double dose in a category now stacked with triples.

TTXU Most leveraged tech ETFs double a whole sector. TTXU doubles the daily move of just five mega-cap tech names, equal weighted and capped, for 0.98% net of a waiver through September 1, 2027.

Stated mandate

ROM ROM seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to twice the daily performance of the S&P Technology Select Sector SM Index.

TTXU The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the performance of the S&P 500 Information Technology (Sector) Top 5 Equal Capped Index.

Why people hold it

  • ROM Two times, not three. A 2x daily target means smaller swings and less compounding drag than a 3x fund chasing the same sector.sec.gov
  • Live since January 2007, so it has run through the 2008 crash and the full tech cycle since. Long mileage is rare in geared funds.
  • 0.93% a year, flat, with no waiver propping it up. Peer QLD runs 0.89%, but only net of a waiver through September 30, 2027.
  • One of the strongest implementations in the leveraged-bull pack, from an issuer that has run geared funds since the category's early days.proshares.com
  • TTXU Tracks a published S&P index of five large-cap tech names, equal weighted and capped, and targets 200% of that index's daily move.direxion.com
  • 0.98% net of a waiver through September 1, 2027: near the category median, and in line with broader 2x tech funds ROM (0.93%) and QLD (0.89%, waiver through September 30, 2027).
  • Rules-based rather than discretionary: exposure follows one published index, SPXTT5UP, with the daily target and an intraday value posted by the issuer.direxion.com

Worth knowing

  • ROM The 2x target resets at each close, so results over weeks or months depend on the path the sector takes, not just where it ends up.sec.govproshares.com
  • Trades thinner than the category's headline names, so spreads and limit orders matter, especially in size.
  • About 80 tech names from the S&P 500. That is one concentrated sector bet, doubled, in both directions.
  • TTXU The 2x target resets every day. Held longer, compounding can push results away from twice the index, especially in choppy markets.direxion.com
  • Small and thinly traded since its 2025 launch, so spreads, order size and a short track record are all part of the deal.
  • The 0.98% is net of a contractual waiver through September 1, 2027; gross expenses are 6.59%.

Full ROM profile⁠

Full TTXU profile⁠

ROM vs TTXU Holdings

How ROM and TTXU differ

Overlap by weight

15.2%

Shared holdings make up 31.7% of ROM and 15.4% of TTXU.

Level by level

  • Holdings5 in both15.2%
  • Countryby domicile99.4%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

No Sector split for TTXU.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in ROM and TTXU, widest gap first
CountryMore in ROMMore in TTXU
United StatesTTXU +0.6 points
Other countries (2)ROM +0.6 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • ROM70.0%
  • TTXU89.8%

Securities held

  • ROM84
  • TTXU7

Asset class

ROM
Equity
TTXU
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in ROM79
  • In both5
  • Only in TTXU2

Only in ROM

79 securities, 39.2% of ROM by weight

  • Proshares Genius Mny Mkt Etf3.23%
  • Advanced Micro Devices2.83%
  • Palantir Technologies Inc-A1.62%

Only in TTXU

2 securities, 6.5% of TTXU by weight

  • Goldman Finl Sq Trsry Inst 5063.26%
  • Goldman Sachs Fin Gov 465 Institut3.26%

Weight gaps

All 5 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in ROM and TTXU, widest gap first
HoldingMore in ROMMore in TTXU
NVIDIA CorpNVDAROM +6.46 points
Apple IncAAPLROM +6.04 points
Microsoft CorpMSFTROM +3.95 points
Micron Technology IncMUTTXU +0.24 points
Broadcom IncAVGOROM +0.08 points

All 80 ROM holdings⁠All TTXU holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

ROM vs TTXU Cost

Overpaying TTXU vs ROM

$823

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • ROM 0.93%

    $17,539

  • TTXU 0.98%

    $18,362

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • ROM 0.93%
  • TTXU 0.98%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530TTXU $18,362ROM $17,539

Year by year

YearROMTTXUOverpaying
10$1,644$1,729$85
20$6,199$6,504$305
30$17,539$18,362$823

Expense ratio

  • 0.93%ROM, cheaper
  • 0.98%TTXU
  • Middle half of Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
  • Median 0.95%

ROM 29th cheapest of 95 funds

TTXU 71st cheapest of 95 funds

ROM vs TTXU Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Yield (12M)
ROM 0.03%
TTXU No data
Payout (12M)
ROM $0.04
TTXU No data
Last payment
ROM $0.02
TTXU $0.04
Ex-dividend
ROM Mar 25, 2026
TTXU Sep 22, 2026
Paid on
ROM Mar 31, 2026
TTXU Sep 29, 2026
Frequency
ROM Quarterly
TTXU Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

ROMQuarterly · 19 paymentsAll ROM payments⁠
One bar per payment. 19 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 22, 2017 $0.0015; Dec 26, 2017 $0.0075; Mar 21, 2018 $0.0064; Jun 20, 2018 $0.006; Dec 26, 2018 $0.02; Mar 20, 2019 $0.01; Jun 25, 2019 $0.0043; Dec 24, 2019 $0.01; Mar 25, 2020 $0.02; Dec 20, 2023 $0.0042; Mar 20, 2024 $0.01; Jun 26, 2024 $0.04; Sep 25, 2024 $0.06; Dec 23, 2024 $0.03; Mar 26, 2025 $0.02; Jun 25, 2025 $0.14; Sep 24, 2025 $0.05; Dec 24, 2025 $0.02; Mar 25, 2026 $0.02. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.102017202020232026YTD
TTXUQuarterly · 4 paymentsAll TTXU payments⁠
One bar per payment. 4 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 23, 2025 $0.07; Mar 24, 2026 $0.04; Jun 23, 2026 $0.05; Sep 22, 2026 $0.04. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.102017202020232026YTD

ROM vs TTXU Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
ROM 49.3%TTXU 86.2%since Nov 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
ROM 0.97TTXU 0.48since Nov 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
ROM −67.6%TTXU −51.5%since Oct 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
ROM 3.09TTXU 5.32

Popular comparisons

  • ROMAvsQLDA

    ProShares Ultra Technology · ProShares Ultra QQQ

    Expense ratio
    0.93% · 0.89%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • TTXUDvsQLDA

    Direxion Daily Technology Top 5 Bull 2X ETF · ProShares Ultra QQQ

    Expense ratio
    0.98% · 0.89%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • ROMAvsUYGA

    ProShares Ultra Technology · ProShares Ultra Financials

    Expense ratio
    0.93% · 0.93%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • TTXUDvsUYGA

    Direxion Daily Technology Top 5 Bull 2X ETF · ProShares Ultra Financials

    Expense ratio
    0.98% · 0.93%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • ROMAvsDDMB

    ProShares Ultra Technology · ProShares Ultra Dow30

    Expense ratio
    0.93% · 0.95%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • TTXUDvsDDMB

    Direxion Daily Technology Top 5 Bull 2X ETF · ProShares Ultra Dow30

    Expense ratio
    0.98% · 0.95%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.